Case law

Brown v. Cathey

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 2, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KURELL BROWN, … V.

Brown v. Laino

District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 18, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CARL BROWN, … Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v.

United States v. Yonkers Board of Education

118 F.R.D. 326 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1987

This is not a case, like Ingram v. … For this latter rate, it cites Mendoza v. Blum, 602 F.Supp. 200 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Williamsburg Fair Housing Committee v. Ross-Rodney Housing Corp., 599 F.Supp. 509 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Lyons v.

Midvale Paper Board Co. v. United States

31 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 20, 1940

See Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. United States, ct. cl., 23 F.Supp. 471 ; Allied Agents, Inc. v. United States, ct.cl., 26 F.Supp. 98 ;. Rosoff Tunnel Corp. v. Higgins, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 880 . … Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. United States [supra].” See also above-quotations from case of Haggar Company v. Helvering, supra.

Despatch Shops, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board

60 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1945

The Board’s decision if supported by substantial evidence in the record, and if it is not arbitrary or capricious and has a reasonable basis in law, must be sustained by this court. Ellers v. … The holding in Duquesne Warehouse Company v.

Deleon v. Putnam Valley Board of Education

228 F.R.D. 213 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 2005

See, e.g., Phifer v. … (citing Isabelle V. v. City of New York, 150 A.D.2d 312 , 541 N.Y.S.2d 809 (1st Dep’t 1989)).

Manfredi v. Mount Vernon Board of Education

94 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 2000

Plaintiff appealed and the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that a school board could be liable for student-on-student harassment under Title IX. See Davis v. Monroe Cty. … See *455 Newsday v.

Pittman v. Brown

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 2024

; DEONNA BROWN, Defendants. … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

Brown v. Trovato

District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 21, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARISSA BROWN, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-9895 (JGLC) RICHARD TROVATO, … for all parties must file a joint letter setting forth a proposed briefing schedule for any dispositive motions and motions to exclude testimony of experts pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 702-705 and the Daubert v.

Brown v. Google

District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 26, 2024

Servs., Inc. v. W.V. Univ. Hosps., Inc., 660 F.3d 643, 648 (2d Cir. 2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); Wright v. Giuliani, 230 F.3d 543, 547 (2d Cir. 2000). … Moore v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 409 F.3d 506, 510 (2d Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Solis v. Brown

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 5, 2024

Petitioner, -against- 24-CV-2700 (LTS) ATTORNEY VICTOR MANUEL BROWN … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

Jefferson v. Brown

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 2024

Plaintiff seems to allege that Defendant Young Brown resides, like him, in Hollis, Queens County, New York. (ECF 1, at 3.) … See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED.

Brown v. Trovato

District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 23, 2024

See, e.g., United States v. Mejia, 655 F.3d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing von Bulow ex rel. Auersperg v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir. 1987)); Ambac Assur. Corp. v. … See Lichtenstein v.

Solis v. Brown

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 7, 2024

Petitioner, -against- 24cv2700 (LTS) ATTORNEY VICTOR MANUEL BROWN … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED.

Solis v. Brown

District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 21, 2024

The named Respondent is Victor Manuel Brown, who appears to be a New York County Assistant District Attorney. … Dorsey v. Kelly, 112 F.3d 50, 52 (2d Cir. 1997) (quoting Daye v. Attorney General, 696 F.2d 186, 191 (2d Cir. 1982)).

American Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

453 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 5, 1978

See Title Guarantee Co. v. … See Brockway v.

Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.

85 F. Supp. 2d 282 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 25, 2000

The second group of defendants are Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Limited (“SCB Holdings”), Stirling Cooke Brown Insurance Brokers Limited, Stirling Cooke Brown Reinsurance Brokers Limited, Stirling Cooke Brown North American … According to the SCB defendants, "[v]irtually all of the documents are located with Odyssey, Euro, Whitcombe, Henton or [SCB]’s London Offices”. SCB Mem. at 33 (citing April 27, 1999 Brown Decl. ¶ 7). 32 .

United States v. Yonkers Board of Education

518 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 1981

School Board Motion to Sever, ¶ 1. Further, the Board relies on language contained in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 22-28 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1279 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971) and Hart v. … The Board contends that this allegation conflicts with the determination of the Supreme Court in Dayton Board of Education v.

United States v. Yonkers Board of Education

108 F.R.D. 199 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 20, 1985

Community School Board of Brooklyn, New York School District #21, 383 F.Supp. 699, 767 (E.D.N.Y. 1974), affd, 512 F.2d 37 (2d Cir.1975), a formula also invoked by the Sixth Circuit in Reed v. … As stated by counsel for the Yonkers Board of Education, Mr.

Chance v. Board of Examiners

472 F. Supp. 1238 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 19, 1979

The Board of Examiners.appealed, arguing inter alia that the intervening decision of the Supreme Court in Washington v. … In a decision handed down on August 11,1977, the Court of Appeals found it unnecessary to consider Washington v.