Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

1.13s

  • Rowley v. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District

    483 F. Supp. 528 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1980

    The testimony of the plaintiffs’ experts, however, was clearly applicable to Amy. … Eligibility requirements In order to qualify for assistance under this subchapter in any fiscal year, a State shall demonstrate to the Commissioner that the following conditions are met: (5) The State has established .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Szlosek v. NYS Office of the Attorney General

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 2025

    The party opposing the amendment has the burden of establishing its futility. Blaskiewicz v. County of Suffolk, 29 F. … The OAG enjoys sovereign immunity and none of Szlosek’s supplemental allegations qualifies as an exception. New York state has not waived sovereign immunity for claims pursuant to the ADA, ADEA, NYSHRL or NYCHRL.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rusfeldt v. City of New York, New York

    District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 2024

    He argues that he is entitled to qualified immunity. … [T]he whole point of the qualified immunity defense is to allow a defendant to be dismissed out of the case even if a right was actually violated (i.e., where it can be shown that the right asserted was not clearly established

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garcia v. Bowen

    702 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 5, 1988

    Under the EAJA a prevailing plaintiff qualifies for costs and attorneys’ fees if the Government’s position was not substantially justified. … Garcia’s treating psychiatrist established that the plaintiff suffers from at least three impairments, each of them sufficiently severe to qualify individually as a “listed” impairment.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Washington v. Poole

    507 F. Supp. 2d 342 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 28, 2007

    Miller, 451 F.3d 54 , 57 n. 1 (2d Cir.2006) (“Brown II”), for the purpose of determining the contemporaneous “clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.” … Nonetheless, the Court is obligated to consider Cunningham to the extent that it applies or explains principles that were "clearly established” in previous Supreme Court cases.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kofer v. Village of Pelham

    710 F. Supp. 483 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 1989

    The village claims that Kofer was not qualified for the position she sought, and cannot, therefore, establish a prima facie case of discrimination. Ramseur v. … have relied or by decid *485 ing an issue of first impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed”; and because “a holding of non-retroactivity” would “avoid[] the injustice of hardship.”

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kelly

    244 F.R.D. 222 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 24, 2007

    Curiously, defendants argue that qualified immunity defenses will require mini-trials to determine the reasonableness of each defendant’s *232 actions vis-á-vis each plaintiff in light of the "established law at the time. … However, because plaintiff's proposed class definitions concern only post-Loper enforcement, and Loper clearly established the unconstitutionality of section 240.35(1), to the extent that qualified immunity does become an

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Schorr v. American Arbitration Association

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 27, 2022

    The One Claim Barred by Arbitral Immunity Of the SAC’s eight claims, one clearly targets conduct “associated with the adjudicative phase of the arbitration to justify immunity.” Id. … But, assuming arguendo that these did so qualify, Doggart would be correct.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Akinde v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation

    District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 2019

    “A government official ‘is entitled to qualified immunity if his actions do not “violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known” or “if it was objectively reasonable … Singleton’s actions were “objectively reasonable” or were so similar to the prosecutorial function that she is entitled to the protections of qualified or absolute immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cornett v. Sheldon

    894 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 8, 1995

    Petition signatures must be witnessed by a party member who is a qualified voter or by a notary public or commissioner of deeds. Id. § 6-140. … Saunders, 627 F.2d 606 (2d Cir.1980), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, drawing upon qualified immunity and equal protection jurisprudence, formulated the standard for judging an alleged deprivation of equal protection

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.

    212 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 1963

    It would be an improvident trespass upon the separation of the powers, if not a complete usurpation of power, were the court to grant immunity in advance of an actual transaction. Cf., Pugach v. … Such a contingent liability clearly precludes the granting of declaratory relief. International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Local 37 v.

    Reversed on other grounds by International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. Seatrain Lines, Inc., and Sea Land Services, Inc., 326 F.2d 916 (1964)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Querry v. Messar

    14 F. Supp. 2d 437 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 27, 1998

    “It is enough for the plaintiff to suggest the existence of a plausible accommodation, the costs of which, facially, do not clearly exceed its benefits.” Borkowski v. Valley Cent. Sch. … As previously established Querry is not "otherwise qualified” for her job as police officer, and therefore is not a member of a "disabled” class of police officers protected by the ADA.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Rasmussen v. Toia

    420 F. Supp. 757 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 1976

    This residual category of individuals qualified to receive Home Relief if defined by N.Y. … The municipal policy in Davis was clearly irrational. We reach a different conclusion in respect of the statute at bar. 3 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rothman v. City of New York

    District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 5, 2019

    C) Wunsch Is Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity As to each and every federal claim, Defendants argue that the two police officers are entitled to qualified immunity. (Defs.’ Mem. Supp. at 9-11.) … “Police officers are immune from liability for money damages in suits brought against them in their individual capacities if ‘their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Halbrook v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.

    735 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 16, 1990

    Halbrook, a female and thus a member of a protected group, and apparently qualified for the position of General Counsel, was denied a promotion to a position filled by a male. … Clearly, there is a triable issue of fact as to whether Halbrook’s responsibilities were sufficiently changed or reduced so as to make her job intolerable.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Sales v. Republic of Uganda

    828 F. Supp. 1032 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 9, 1993

    Since federal jurisdiction in this case is premised on diversity and the right to interest on a cause of action qualifies as a substantive right, the question is governed by New York law. See Adams v. … its sovereign immunity.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Fernandez v. United States

    553 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 16, 1982

    Rollins, 522 F.2d 160, 165 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 918 , 96 S.Ct. 1122 , 47 L.Ed.2d 324 (1976) (claim raised after trial was clearly waived by defendant’s failure to move for suppression prior to trial). … Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 , 79 S.Ct. 1173 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959). b. ) any and all promises, agreements or understandings as to any immunity, leniency, advantages or preferential treatment and/or other benefits of any kind

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fallahi v. Raisolsadati

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 21, 2022

    First, Plaintiffs argue that Raisi does not qualify for head of state immunity because he is not a head of state or head of government under Iranian law. See Pls.’ Motion 4-5. … are no more free 2 Plaintiffs assert that a court would “[s]urely . . . not be required to defer to a designation by the Executive that some foreign personality is a head of state or government when he or she is clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re McCray

    928 F. Supp. 2d 748 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 5, 2013

    After the New York Court of Appeals recognized a qualified reporter’s privilege under New York State’s constitution and the United States Constitution in O’Neill , the law was extended to provide qualified protection to nonconfidential … The Qualified Reporter’s Privilege A reporter has “a qualified evidentiary privilege for information gathered in a journalistic investigation.” Chevron Corp. v. Berlinger, 629 F.3d 297, 308 (2d Cir.2011).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rosen v. Brookhaven Capital Management, Co., Ltd.

    194 F. Supp. 2d 224 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 7, 2002

    Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 , 100 S.Ct. 1920 , 64 L.Ed.2d 572 (1980) (holding that defendant in civil rights case has burden of pleading defense of qualified immunity and plaintiff has no obligation to anticipate such defense … It has long been established that statutory exceptions constitute defenses which must be pleaded and proved by the defense.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.