Case law

Brown v. Kelly

244 F.R.D. 222 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 24, 2007

V 1. . See Brown I, 2007 WL 1573957 , at *4-5. . … Thompson v. Board of Educ. of the Romeo Cmty. Schs., 709 F.2d 1200, 1205 (6th Cir.1983) (quoting Mudd v. Busse, 68 F.R.D. 522, 527-28 (N.D.Ind.1975)). . See Def. Mem. at 28-29 (citing New York v.

Fox v. Brown

286 F. Supp. 855 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 28, 1968

Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289, 296 (E.D.N.Y.1968). … As stated by the Supreme Court in Orloff v.

Rogers v. Brown

136 F. 813 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 1905

In Brooks v. Byan, 2 Story, 553 , Fed. Cas. … Subsequently, a similar question came up before Woodruff, J., in Dennis v. Eddy, 12 Blatch. 195, 198, Fed. Cas. No. 3,793, and he said; “2.

Brown v. Sacher

53 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 6, 1943

The language of the statute is no wider in scope than that quoted in N.L.R.B. v. Express Publishing Company, 1941, 312 U. … Granting this proposition and, indeed, in the light of N.L.R.B. v.

Brown v. Henderson

115 F. Supp. 2d 445 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 29, 2000

Runyon, 101 F.3d at 289 (quoting Boyd v. United States Postal Service, 752 F.2d 410, 413-14 (9th Cir.1985) (citing Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976))). … See Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. at 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 ; Pauling v. Secretary of Dept. of Interior, 160 F.3d 133, 134 (2d Cir.1998); Briones v. Runyon, 101 F.3d 287, 289 (2d Cir.1996).

Brown v. Doe

803 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1992

People v. Brown, 136 A.D.2d 1 , 525 N.Y.S.2d 618 (2nd Dep’t 1988). … People v. Brown, 136 A.D.2d at 12 , 525 N.Y.S.2d 618 supra; see Tr.

Sharrow v. Brown

319 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 1, 1970

In United States v. … United States v.

Brown v. Matias

102 F.R.D. 580 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 18, 1984

.-15 statements provided by five members of the New York City Police Department in connection with an investigation by the Civilian Complaint Review Board into the beating of plaintiff Lester Brown on August 2, 1983. … Brown v. Matias, No. 83-8373, slip op. at 3-4 (S.D.N.Y. July 6, 1984) (Raby, Mag.).

Brown v. Coughlin

758 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 8, 1991

Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District, 439 U.S. 410 , 99 S.Ct. 693 , 58 L.Ed.2d 619 (1979); Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Sombrotto

523 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1981

Plaintiffs Brown and Ratto were among these delegates. … Calhoon v. Harvey, supra, 379 U.S. at 140 , 85 S.Ct. at 296 . *132 Gurton v. Arons, supra, 339 F.2d at 375 . Accord Sheldon v.

Brown v. Stinson

821 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 22, 1993

Revlon, Inc. v. … Dixon established only that she lent Brown $5,000 which in turn Brown entrusted to defendant. T. 9-10. Therefore, all claims made by her are dismissed. Hereinafter, the term "plaintiff” refers only to Totlee Brown. 2 .

Brown v. Doe

811 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 1993

Petitioner has brought two civil suits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 growing out of the incident involved, filed respectively in 1983 and 1984: Brown v. Lindermann, et al., 83 Civ. 6174 (RLC), and Brown v. … In People v.

Brown v. DeFilippis

695 F. Supp. 1528 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 12, 1988

Background and Prior Proceedings Pro se plaintiff John Brown (“Brown”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985, 1986 and 1988 on May 21, 1987. … At a minimum, these contentions raise serious questions and thus further factfinding may be necessary to determine the merits of Brown’s claims. Prejudice to the plaintiff may not merely result in delay, Davis v.

Brown v. Keane

229 F. Supp. 2d 298 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 2002

People v. Brown, 284 A.D.2d 156, 156 , 726 N.Y.S.2d 252, 252 (1st Dept.2001) (quoting Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980)). 3 . Id. 4 . People v. … Brown, 618 So.2d 629, 634 (La.Ct.App.1993) (same). 62 . See People v.

Acosta v. Brown

50 F. Supp. 615 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1943

Farmer v. Elstner, C.C.E.D.Mich., 1888, 33 F. 494, 496 . … In Barry v.

Gibson v. Brown

44 F. 98 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 20, 1890

Shipping Co. v. Armitage, L. R. 9 Q. B. 99, 107. … Shipping Co. v. Armitage, supra; Robinson v. Knights, L. R. 8 C. P. 465; The Norway, 3 Moore, P. C. (N. S.) 245; Querini Stamphalia, 19 Fed. Rep. 123.

Brown v. Myerberg

314 F. Supp. 939 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1970

Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty Corporation, 182 F.2d 311 (2d Cir. 1950); Royal Die Cutting & Heat Sealing Corp. v. Duro Pen Company, Inc., 223 F.Supp. 384 (S.D.N.Y.1963). … General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 118 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1941).

Brown v. Reid

493 F. Supp. 101 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1980

Petitioner, William Brown, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C., section 2254 for the alleged denial of his federal constitutional rights. … People v. Brown, 70 A.D.2d 1061 (1st Dep’t 1979). 3 . People v. Brown, 48 N.Y.2d 637 , 421 N.Y.S.2d 1035 , 396 N.E.2d 208 (1979) (Jones, J.). 4 . See Picard v.

Brown v. Croce

967 F. Supp. 101 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 4, 1997

To support an Eighth Amendment claim, Brown must establish both an objective and subjective component to his claim. See Branham v. Meachum, 77 F.3d 626, 630 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Davidson v. … See Purcell v. Coughlin, 790 F.2d 263, 265 (2d Cir.1986) (citing McCann v.

Brown v. Knowlton

370 F. Supp. 1119 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 1974

The Court quoting Wasson v. Trowbridge, 382 F.2d 807 (2d Cir. 1967), there stated: “The Cadet must be apprised of the specific charges against him. … Furthermore, it cannot be said that the Board was disqualified per se from reconsidering plaintiff’s case because of its prior determination absent some showing of actual bias. As is recognized in Wasson v.