Case law

Brown v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.

594 F. Supp. 2d 382 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 21, 2009

Tademy v. Un. Pacific Corp., 520 F.3d 1149, 1159 (10th Gir.2008) (citing Hollins v. Delta Airlines, 238 F.3d 1255, 1256-58 (10th Cir.2001); Vance v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. … Brown. Magin, 420 F.3d at 686 ; Kotcher v.

National Labor Relations Board v. State Labor Relations Board

99 F. Supp. 526 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1951

United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 332 U.S. 218 , 67 S.Ct. 1560 , 91 L.Ed. 2010 . … The proceeding before the State Board has reached a stage at which a remedy is about to be granted. The National Board is still in the early stages of its consideration of the matter.

Brown v. City of New York

306 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 4, 2004

See Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 823 , 105 S.Ct. 2427 , 85 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985). Absent such sufficient evidence, Brown’s § 1983 claim must be dismissed. See Curry v. … See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 341 (2d Cir.2000).

United States Ex Rel. Brown v. Fay

242 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 1, 1965

Brown v. Warden, Green Haven Prison, 231 F. Supp. 179 (S.D.N.Y.1964). See Holiday v. Johnston, 313 U.S. 342 . 61 S.Ct. 1015 , 85 L.Ed. 1392 (1941); McNally v. Hill, Warden, 293 U.S. 131 , 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L. … People v. Brown, 19 A.D.2d 863 , 245 N.Y.S.2d 987 (2d Dep’t 1963). 6 .

Garcia Ex Rel. Merino v. Brown

442 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 2006

See Dwares v. New York, 985 F.2d 94 , 98 (2d Cir.1993); Brown-Alleyne v. White, 96 CV 2507, 1999 WL 1186809 , 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18511 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 1999). … Plaintiffs do cite to Julmis v.

Alexander v. Board of Education

107 F. Supp. 3d 323 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 13, 2015

Defendant the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York (“BOE” or “Defendant”) (also known as and sued herein as the “The Board of Education of the City School District of the City New York, and … See Muhleisen v.

Lodico v. Board of Supervisors

256 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1966

McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 11] of the State of New York * * * [is] illegal, invalid, void and unconstitutional” 1 and “that the defendant immediately reconstitute and formulate a plan wherein and whereby the vote of the BOARD … This court is of the opinion that the principle of Bailey v.

Nadel v. Shinseki

57 F. Supp. 3d 288 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 2014

See Brown v. … .”); Mattera v.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Pataki

152 F. Supp. 2d 276 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 26, 2001

Current Litigation Against the State On October 12, 2000, C & B filed the complaint in Brown & Williamson, et al. v. … Board of Education of the City of New York v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241, 1246 (2d *282 Cir.1979) (internal citations and footnotes omitted).

Cunney v. Board of Trustees

56 F. Supp. 3d 470 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 29, 2014

V, at unnumbered 2 (Letter from Planning Board Chair to Colla-zuol, Nov. 9, 2007).) … [did] not require a contrary result” because “[t]he Planning Board possessed wide discretion under then existing law”); Vertical Broad., Inc. v.

Silberberg v. Board of Elections

216 F. Supp. 3d 411 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 3, 2016

Oct. 28, 2016) (quoting Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1, 5-6 , 127 S.Ct. 5 , 166 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006) (per curiam)); Reynolds v. … New York City Board of Elections No-Photography Policy.

United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.

169 F.R.D. 532 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 26, 1996

Bottaro v. … See United States v.

Brown v. First National City Bank

365 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 7, 1973

Rosenspan v. First National City Bank, 72 Civ. 4515 (S.D.N.Y., filed Aug. 23, 1973). … In addition, the state claims stem from a “common nucleus of operative fact”, United Mine Workers v.

Stechler v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.

382 F. Supp. 2d 580 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 2005

This Court alone is currently proceeding with Seippel v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, 93 in which Brown & Wood is a party, and Denney and Blythe v. … Board of Educ. of New York, 287 F.3d 138, 145 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957) (alterations omitted)). 55 . Phelps v.

Aiello v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.

751 F. Supp. 2d 698 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2011

Kellogg, Brown & Root, Inc., 444 F.Supp.2d 1277 (M.D.Ga.2006) (same); Bentzlin v. … The case factually closest to this one is Harris v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., 618 F.Supp.2d 400 (W.D.Pa.2009).

Chance v. Board of Examiners

70 F.R.D. 334 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 11, 1976

Chance v. Board of Examiners, Civ.No. 70-4141 (HRT) (S.D.N.Y., April 4, 1975). The Board contends here that the decision of the Supreme Court in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. … See, e. g., Ward v. Kelly, 515 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1975); Thompson v. Madison County Board of Education, 496 F.2d 682 (5th Cir. 1974); Jackson v.

Hirschfeld v. Board of Elections

799 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 21, 1992

Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 , 103 S.Ct. 1564 , 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983) (state must advance compelling, precise interest to justify denial of access to the ballot); Illinois Board of Elections v. … Williams v. Velez, 580 F.2d 1046 (2d Cir.1978) (misinformation provided by the Board of Elections is not valid ground for denying access to the ballot).

Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Brown Alaska Co.

148 F. 308 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 8, 1906

C.) 116 Fed. 947 ; Helms v. Northern P. Ry. Co. (C. C.) 120 Fed. 389 ; Harley v. Home Insurance Co. (C. C.) 125 Fed. 792 ; Henry v. Illinois Central Ry. Co. (C. C.) 132 Fed. 715 ; Cella et al. v. Brown et al. (C. … The present question relates solely to the Brown Company. In Iowa Lilooet Gold Mining Company v. Bliss et al. (C.

Atlanta Shipping Corp. v. Cross & Brown Co.

113 F.R.D. 108 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 17, 1986

Freight Co. v. … The order stated: ORDERED, that Cross & Brown’s motion to dismiss is granted to the extent that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice unless plaintiff, on or before August 14, 1986, serves responses to Cross & Brown

Board of Governors v. Pharaon

140 F.R.D. 634 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 16, 1991

See Cooper v. Welch Foods, Inc., 105 F.R.D. 4, 6 (W.D.N.Y.1984). Pharaon also relies on United States v. … Daval Steel Products v.