Case law

Inner City Press/Community on the Move v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

380 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 19, 2005

Post Co. v. U.S. … Because the burden of supporting non-disclosure is on the Board, and the Board has made no argument or showing directed specifically at item (v), this analysis is sufficient to find that the Board’s future ability to collect

Wenberg v. A Cargo of Mineral Phosphate

15 F. 285 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 19, 1883

Brown, J. This libel was filed as “a cause of possession, civil and maritime,” against a cargo of mineral phosphate on board the bark Busy, and against James C. Jewitt. … Adm. 229; Cutler v. Rae, 7 How. 729, 731 ; Marshall v. Pierrez, 9 Ben. 391 ; U. S. v. Nourse, 6 Pet. 470 ; The Monte A, 12 Fed.

Middlesex Quarry Co. v. Schooner Albert Mason

2 F. 821 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 25, 1880

The Bobert Smith was bound on a voyage from Portland, Connecticut, to New York, with a cargo of about 90 tons of brown stone. Between 6 and 7 o’clock she put into New Haven for a harbor, the wind being S. S. E. to S. … Nor is the theory of inattention or failure of those on board the Albert Mason to observe a light, which they might have seen if they had looked, tenable in this case.

Scully v. The Taurus

63 F. 137 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. … That the Condor had on board three men, who were sufficient for tin* (Talles required of them, and (hat she did not ground through lack of men to answer properly Hu* orders of the Kate Jones. 3.

Derogatis v. Board of Trustees of Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers

167 F. Supp. 3d 574 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 2, 2016

Bell v. Pfizer, Inc., 626 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2010) (quoting Pegrarn v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211, 226 , 120 S.Ct. 2143 , 147 L.Ed.2d 164 (2000)). … Plaintiff also relies heavily on Bouboulis v. Transp.

Meehancombs Global Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP v. Caesars Entertainment Corp.

162 F. Supp. 3d 200 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 2015

Corp., 758 F.3d 473, 486 (2d Cir.2014) (citing Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)). . Robinson, 781 F.3d at 44 (quoting Brown v. … Id. at 916 (emphasis added) (quoting Hibbs v. Brown, 190 N.Y. 167, 174 , 82 N.E. 1108 (1907)). . Id. . See LaSalle Bank Nat'l Ass’n v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp., 424 F.3d 195 , 206 (2d Cir.2005).

Koch v. The Mary L. Cushing

60 F. 110 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 26, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. In the heavy storm of August 24, 1893, the ship Mary L. … The Morning Light, 2 Wall. 550 ; The Grace Girdler, 7 Wall. 196, 203 ; The Mabey and Cooper, 14 Wall. 215 ; The Austria, 9 Fed. 916 , 14 Fed. 298 ; The Worthington and Davis, 19 Fed. 836 ; Neel v.

United States ex rel. Gaudio v. Commissioner of Immigration

18 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 1937

The arrival record of January 6, 1916, shows, brown hair, brown eyes, and reg. complexion; that of February 23, 1928, shows, brown eyes, brozvn hair, nat. complexion; the application of November 9, 1927, shows, brozvn hair … , brown eyes, dark *707 complexion.

American Pad & Textile Co. v. Cluff Fabric Products, Inc.

49 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 1943

Brown’s patent, issued upon March 12, 1933. … McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U.S. 419, 427 , 12 S.Ct. 76 , 35 L.Ed. 800 .

United States Ex Rel. Ott v. Shaughnessy

116 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1953

Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 230 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . 8 . Yong Yung See v. United States, 9 Cir., 92 F.2d 700 ; Singh v. … Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 , 4 S. Ct. 111, 292 , 28 L.Ed. 232 ; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 , 67 S.Ct. 1672 , 91 L.Ed. 1903 . 14 . Cf.

WMCA, Inc. v. Simon

196 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1961

Brown; James J. McCafferty, Plaintiffs, v. Caroline K. SIMON, Secretary of State of the State of New York, Louis J. … See, e. g., Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 1960, 364 U.S. 339 , 81 S.Ct. 125 , 5 L.Ed.2d 110 ; Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; Nixon v.

McGuire v. City of New York

192 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 1961

The broader use is within the letter of the definition, but it may well be doubted whether, for example, a libel or a slander put in circulation on board a ship, could be made the basis of a suit in admiralty. * * * ” Brown … De Lovio v.

March v. Real Estate Board of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 2025

OF NEW YORK x DATE FILED: 01/07/2025 _ MONTY MARCH ET AL., 23-CV-9995 (JGLC) (RWL) Plaintiffs, : - against - REAL ESTATE BOARD … The request for a stay pending resolution of the appeal of Burnett v NAR in the Eighth Circuit is GRANTED.

Scott v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

59 F. 638 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 22, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. The above libel was fded to recover damages caused by an alleged collision about 8 or 9 o’clock A. … The forward part of her deck came off (Cornwall v.

Dinniny v. The Sam Sloan

65 F. 125 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. … The Sloan had many passengers on board.

Rosemond v. Menifee

137 F. Supp. 2d 270 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 22, 2000

Board of Parole cannot be transferred to the BOP. … . § 3568 ); Brown v. United States, 489 F.2d 1036, 1037 (8th Cir.1974) (per curiam) (“This court has recognized the authority of Davis.”); United States v.

Lachman v. Bell

353 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1972

The plaintiff objected to the plan when it was presented to the board of directors. … Brown, 39 Del.Ch. 1 , 157 A.2d 784 ; Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp., 34 Del.Ch. 6 , 99 A.2d 236 (1953).

In Re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation

434 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 14, 2006

See, e.g., Langner v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 260, 264 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). … An essential predicate of the Aronson test is that a decision of the board of directors is being challenged in the derivative suit. Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 933 (Del. 1993).

Perrotta v. Irizarry

430 F. Supp. 1274 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1977

Williams v. Halperin, supra; Brown v. Duggan, 329 F.Supp. 207 (W.D.Pa.1971). Plaintiff has also failed to allege facts which constitute a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3). … Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 327 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1964); Dickinson v. French, 416 F.Supp. 429 (S.D.Ala.1976).

Rodner v. United States

149 F. Supp. 233 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 6, 1957

Rodner was never authorized by the Board of Directors of Warner Bros. Service Corporation or by the Board of Directors of the parent corporation, Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. … Flarsheim v. United States, 8 Cir., 156 F.2d 105 ; Varnedoe v. Allen, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 467 ; Sutro v. U. S., 42-2 U.S.T.C. Rep. C.C.H. Para. 9523. 2 . “(b) Exclusions from gross income.