Case law

Miller v. O'Brien

59 F. 621 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 5, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. … Such is the rule laid down by Emerigon, (Cont. a la Grosse, c. 11, § 22;) and this seems to be approved as the general maritime rule in Insurance Co. v. Gossler, 96 U.

International Grain Ceiling Co. v. Dill

13 F. Cas. 70 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 15, 1878

Dennistoun v. Draper [Case No. 3,804]. … Harris v. Hardman, 14 How. [55 U. S.] 334.

Turner v. Willard

154 F. Supp. 352 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 6, 1956

See O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 1951, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 ; Hastorf-Nettles, Inc. v. Pillsbury, 9 Cir., 1953, 203 F. *355 2d 641; Jewel Tea Co. v. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 1951, 340 U.S. 504, 506 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 471 , 95 L.Ed. 483 .

Young v. One Hundred & Forty Thousand Hard Brick

78 F. 149 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 1896

BROWN, District Judge. Tlie libelant claims demurrage for eight days’ delay in the discharge of a cargo of 252,500 brick taken on board the scow Riley & Rose at Roseton,afew miles above Newburg, on September 5,1894. … Cont. 58; Walls v. Bailey, 49 N. Y. 464, 468 . See The Eddy, 5 Wall. 481, 486, 496 ; Isaksson v. Williams, 26 Fed. 642 ; The Innocenta, 10 Ben. 410 , Fed. Cas. No. 7,050.

Cheatham v. Wheeling & L. E. Ry. Co.

37 F.2d 593 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 25, 1930

Brown v. Duluth, M. & N. Ry. Co. (C. C.) 53 F. 889 ; In re Robert Clarke, Inc., 186 App. Div. 216, 219 , 174 N. Y. S. 314; Matter of Hastings, 120 App. Div. 756, 757 , 105 N. Y. S. 834; Pray v. Todd, 71 App. … Ed. 703 , Judge Brown’s practice was never challenged or criticized. The same practice rule is laid down in Chelsea Exchange Bank v. Travelers’ Ins. Co., 173 App. Div. 829, 833, 834 , 160 N. Y. S. 225.

The Queen

40 F. 694 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1889

Brown, J. … But in the case of Quinn v. Lighterage Co., 23 Fed.

Phillips v. The Energia

56 F. 124 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 4, 1893

BROWN, District Judge. … Steam Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., 129 U. S. 397 , 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 469.

United States Ex Rel. Randazzo v. Follette

282 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 1968

I do not read United States v. … Brown v. Kearney, 355 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1966), has a dictum that a parolee is entitled to protection from an “illegal” search; it does not state what kind of search would be “illegal”. The decision in Story v.

Garcia v. Yonkers Board of Education

District Court, S.D. New York · May 28, 2020

Nemaizer v. Baker, 729 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir. 1986) (internal citations omitted). … Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. Gov’t of Lao People’s Democratic Republic, 864 F.3d 172, 182 (2d Cir. 2017) (quoting Kotlicky v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 817 F.2d 6, 9 (2d Cir. 1987)).

Barnard v. TIAA Board of Overseers

District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 13, 2019

7{(3/(4 TYLER BARNARD, Plaintiff, V. … See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED.

United States Ex Rel. Ott v. Shaughnessy

116 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1953

Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 230 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . 8 . Yong Yung See v. United States, 9 Cir., 92 F.2d 700 ; Singh v. … Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 , 4 S. Ct. 111, 292 , 28 L.Ed. 232 ; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 , 67 S.Ct. 1672 , 91 L.Ed. 1903 . 14 . Cf.

Doherr v. The Etona

64 F. 880 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 24, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. … Montoya v. Assurance Co., 6 Exch. 451. The burden of *882 showing negligence in the ship was on the libelant. Transportation Co. v.

Doe 1 v. The College Board

District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 18, 2020

.”); Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merch. Corp. 9L EF. … Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 26 F.

Derogatis v. Board of Trustees of Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers

167 F. Supp. 3d 574 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 2, 2016

Bell v. Pfizer, Inc., 626 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2010) (quoting Pegrarn v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211, 226 , 120 S.Ct. 2143 , 147 L.Ed.2d 164 (2000)). … Plaintiff also relies heavily on Bouboulis v. Transp.

United States v. Baran

192 F. Supp. 3d 496 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 2016

Brown v. United States, No. 05 CR 857, 2011 WL 3273202 , at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2011). … Id.; see, e.g„ United States v.

Jordan v. United States Lines, Inc.

291 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 24, 1968

In Hoffman v. … See, e. g., Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Brown, 348 F.2d 689 (10th Cir. 1965); Glazer v. Colonial Village Corp., 232 F.Supp. 892 (E.D.Tenn.1964); Glicken v. Bradford, 204 F.Supp. 300 (S.D.N.Y.1962).

A Cargo of Malt

10 F. 774 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1881

Brown, D. J. This libel was filed to recover a balance alleged to be due for taking on board, holding, and transporting a cargo of malt upon a canal-boat of the libellant. … The oral contract, under which the cargo was taken on board, was made by the libellant with Mr. Ramsay, the agent of the claimant.

United States v. Lavin

346 F. Supp. 76 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 9, 1972

Kempf v. … United States v. Brown, 438 F.2d 1115 (9th Cir. 1971); Briggs v. United States, 397 F.2d 370 (9th Cir. 1908). . The federal Business Records Act does not apply to the custodianship question.

The Cushing

285 F. 617 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 17, 1922

City of New York v. Sage, 239 U. S. 57, 61 , 36 Sup. Ct. 25, 60 L. Ed. 143 ; Lawrence v. Boston, 119 Mass. 126, 128 ; Lanquist v. Chicago, 200 Ill. 69, 73 , 65 N. E. 681 ; Brown v. … Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co., 212 U. S. 1 , 29 Sup. Ct. 148, 53 L. Ed. 371 ; Denver v. Denver Union Water Co., 246 U. S. 178 , 38 Sup. Ct. 278, 62 L. Ed. 649 .

The Queen Olga

162 F. 490 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 12, 1908

In Lake Steam Shipping Co. v. Bacon (D. C.) 129 Fed. 823 , The Shadwan is cited as holding that “ordinarily the charterer is bound to furnish a clean bill of health.” … That physical efficiency only is meant by a breakdown clause similar to the one at bar is, I think, clearly inferable from Hogarth v. Miller [1891] A. C. 48.