Case law

United States v. Madison

781 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 2, 1992

See, e.g., U.S. v. Collado-Gomez, 834 F.2d 280 (2d Cir.1987); U.S. v. Avant, 907 F.2d 623 (6th Cir.1990); U.S. v. Williams, 876 F.2d 1521 (11th Cir.1989); Shaw, supra; Van Hawkins, supra; Barnes, supra; Brown, supra. … Castellano v. Board of Trustees of Police Officer’s Variable Supplements Fund, 937 F.2d 752 (2d Cir.1991), citing Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton, 462 U.S. 176, 196 , 103 S.Ct. 2296, 2308 , 76 L.Ed.2d 497 (1983); Texaco Inc. v.

W. M. C. A., Inc. v. Simon

202 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 11, 1962

Holly Patterson, Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Nassau County, Owen M. Quinn, Chairman, Board of Supervisors, Westchester County, William J. … Crews, Thomas Mallee, Commissioners, Board of Elections, New York City, have answered the complaint, admitting the allegations thereof and in effect asking for the relief sought by the plaintiffs.

Luckenbach v. Scows 3 & 16

50 F. 570 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 30, 1892

Brown, District Judge., On the morning of Tuesday, January 26, 1892, four scows known as Nos. 3, 5,16, and 17, employed in carrying refuse from New York to the dumping grounds outside of Sandy Hook, got adrift in a violent … The fact that the Luckenbach was one of a very few harbor boats suitably equipped and able to render this service, rather adds to her merit than detracts from it, (Coast Wrecking Co. v. Phœnix Ins.

Marx v. Natl. Steam-ship Co.

22 F. 680 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 29, 1884

BROWN, J. … Co. v. Jurey, 111 U. S. 584, 592 ; S. C. 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 566; Nash v. Towne, 5 Wall. 689, 699 ; Robinson v. U. S. 13 Wall, 363; Hostetter v. Gray, 11 Fed. Rep. 179.

Ozanic v. United States

68 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 3, 1946

In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. … The Federal No.2, 2 Cir., 21 F.2d 313 ; Brown v. Pillow, 2 Cir., 174 F. 967 . These principles apply with equal force to the claim for wages.

Havens v. The J. W. Husted

36 F. 604 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 23, 1888

BRown, J. The proof does not establish that the libelant’s lighter Success was overloaded, or improperly loaded, or loaded more than usual. … The captain of the lighter had been put by the Chapman on board the Husted, whose captain refused to allow him to go on the lighter, claiming it to be then in his charge.

Bolckow, Vaughan & Co. v. The Chadwicke

29 F. 521 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 19, 1887

Brown, J. … Perkins v. Hill, 1 Spr. 123 ; Wagstaff v. Anderson, 5 C. P. Div. 171, 177; Sewell v. Burdick, 10 App. Cas. 74, 105; Gledstanes v. Allen, 12 C. B. 202; Rodoconachi v. Milburn, 17 Q. B. Div. 316, 320.

Budget Dress Corp. v. Joint Board of Dress & Waistmakers' Union of Greater New York

178 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 20, 1959

Justice Frankfurter, speaking for the Court in Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 309 U.S. 4 , at page 9, 60 S.Ct. 215 , at pages 217, 218, 84 L.Ed. 537 ; accord: Hill v. … Co., 274 U.S. 588 , 47 S.Ct. 720 , 71 L.Ed. 1219 ; Barrett v. City of New York, C.C., 183 F. 793 ). The threat of injury must be real, not fancied, actual, not prospective, and threatened, not imagined (Weeks v.

Burns v. Baylis

25 F. 862 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 21, 1885

Brown, J. The three petitioners were seamen on the schooner Charles L. Baylis for different periods during the 10 months prior to her arrival in New York, on the nineteenth of October last. … They remained on the ship, and had their board from her stores, but they rendered her no services of any value to the ship or cargo.

Isham v. A Cargo of Pine Piles

46 F. 403 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 1891

Brown, J. 1. … Rep. 123, and cases there cited; McKay v. Ennis, 37 Fed. Rep. 229-232; The Pietro G., 39 Fed. Rep. 366, 40 Fed. Rep. 497.

Boylan v. The International

30 F. 375 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 1887

It docs not depend upon contract, (The Minerva, 1 Hagg. 352,-) but is given by the general maritime law, whenever he is lawfully employed on board. Macl. Shipp. 248, 249. … The Sarah Jane, Blatchf. & H. 401, 406-414; The Minerva, 1 Hagg. 352; Harden v. Gordon, 2 Mason, 541, 556 ; Brown v. Lull, 2 Sum. 449 , 450; The San Marcos, 27 Fed.

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.

203 F. Supp. 575 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1961

Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134, 143 , 44 S.Ct. 336 , 68 L.Ed. 696 (1928); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 77 , 26 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906). … Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134, 143 , 44 S.Ct. 336 , 68 L.Ed. 696 (1928); Schwimmer v.

Hagopian v. Knowlton

346 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 21, 1972

See Grimm v. Brown, 449 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1971) (security violation by Air Force officer); VanBourg v. … Bey v.

Hansen v. Julia Fowler

49 F. 277 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 23, 1892

Brown, District Judge. … The chief officer was not acting in the mere capacity of a fellow-laborer, as in Quinn v. Lighterage Co., 23 Fed. Rep. 363; The Queen, 40 Fed. Rep. 694, 697; Hedley v. Pinkney, (1892,) 1 Q. B. 58.

The Harriet

11 F. Cas. 585 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 15, 1845

The libellant sues In rem by .a summary proceeding, to recover wages earned by his son, a minor, as a hand on board the schooner Harriet, making trips from Saugerties, Ulster county, to Troy, Albany, Hudson, New-York, Brooklyn … Brown v. Saul, 4 Mart. (N. S.) 438; Howard v. The Columbia, 1 La. 420 .

The Edwin

23 F. 255 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 18, 1885

Brown, J. In January, 1884, the libelants shipped as seamen on board the bark Edwin, and signed shipping articles for “a voyage from Iquiqui, So.

G & T Terminal Packaging Co. v. Joe Phillips, Inc.

618 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 25, 1985

California State Board of Equalization, 650 F.2d 1127, 1132 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd., 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 157 (1982); Payne v. Panama Canal Co., 607 F.2d 155, 166 (5th Cir.1979). … The inspection certificate for car No. 452139 discloses neither enlarged lenticels nor browning, but only slimy soft rot.

The T. A. Goddard

12 F. 174 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1882

Brown, D. J. From all the evidence in the case I am satisfied that the injury to the teas from the fumes of the camphor must have arisen on board the T. A. Goddard. … Marcardier v. Chesapeake Ins. Co. 8 Cranch, 49 , 50; Donahoe v. Kettell, 1 Cliff. 135 ; Richardson v. Winsor, 3 Cliff. 395, 400 ; Drinkwater v. The Spartan, 1 Ware, 153, 156; Leary v. U. S. 14 Wall. 607 ; Reed v. U.

John W. Higman & Co. v. Pool Shipping Co.

12 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 6, 1935

Upon the examination of Brown, there was submitted to him by respondents “an account of coals taken on board and consumed on a voyage from Fowey to Portland, Maine, Philadelphia, New York, Antwerp and Tyne,” dated April 19 … In Clifton v. United States, 4 How. 242, 246 , 11 L.

Cambridge Fund, Inc. v. Abella

501 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1980

Fogel v. Chestnutt, supra, at 745, citing Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 421 (2d Cir. 1961), and Rosenfeld v. … Brown v. Bullock, 194 F.Supp. 207 (S.D.N. Y.), aff’d 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1961) sets out the essential elements of a cause of action under Section 37 of the Act. Brown v.