Case law

American Tel. & Tel. v. NYC DEPT. OF HUMAN RES.

736 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 2, 1990

See Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498, 1503-04 (D.C.Cir.1984). … Brown v. United States, supra, 742 F.2d at 1504 ( citing Cohen v. Board of Education, 536 F.Supp. 486, 493-95 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)).

Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.

14 F.R.D. 475 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 22, 1953

Under the Arizona law, and generally, the affairs of a corporation are in the control of the Board of Directors. … Cohen v. Industrial Finance Corporation, D.C., 44 F.Supp. 491 ; Craftsman Finance & Mortgage Inc. v. Brown, D.C., 64 F.Supp. *477 168 . See, also, Steinberg v. Adams, D.C., 90 F.Supp. 604 , an opinion by Judge Rifkind.

Riko Enterprises, Inc. v. Seattle Supersonics Corp.

357 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 1973

The Hartbridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir. 1932), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933). See also, Brown v. … American Airlines, Inc. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Air Board, 269 F.2d 811, 817 (6th Cir. 1959).

The Alice B. Phillips

106 F. 956 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. Tbe libelant was shipped as a seaman for the schooner Alice B. Phillips before the shipping commissioner at Boston, and signed articles dated September 6, 1899. … the amount of wages due was a proper and reasonable act; and that upon the collector’s decision that only $20 was due the seaman, this together with the circumstance that the seaman in fact performed no actual service on board

Hall v. NYC Water Board

District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 2024

against- Order Directing Payment of Fee or Amended IFP Application NYC WATER BOARD … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

Danielson v. Joint Board of Coat, Suit & Allied Garment Workers Unions, ILGWU

367 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 1973

Reasonable cause has been interpreted to mean that there must be a ‘reasonable possibility’ that the Board will sustain the unfair labor practice charge. McLeod for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. … When relief is sought under § 10 (Z), the Board, rather than the federal district court, remains the ‘primary fact finder’ and ‘primary interpreter of the statutory scheme,’ Schauffler v.

In re Texaco, Inc.

210 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 6, 1961

Brown and Assistant Captain Casimiro Zerilli. 2. … Captain Brown and Mr.

Boddie v. New York State Division of Parole

277 F. Supp. 2d 280 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 2003

"that render such process ineffective to protect the rights of the applicant." 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (b)(1)(B)(ii) ( quoted in Brown v. … Brown, 2003 WL 941940 , at *1 ( citing Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 226 , 96 S.Ct. 2532 , 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976)).

Alaimo v. TRI-VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST.

650 F. Supp. 2d 289 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 2009

See, e.g., Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Auth., 333 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir.2003); Brown v. Parkchester S. Condos., 287 F.3d 58, 60 (2d Cir.2002); Canales v. Sullivan, 936 F.2d 755, 758 (2d Cir.1991). … Brown, 287 F.3d at 60 .

Danecker v. Board of Trustees of the Service Employees 32BJ North Pension Fund

882 F. Supp. 2d 606 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 2012

On February 26, 2003, Danecker appealed to the Fund’s Board. Compl. ¶ 25. … See Koert v. GE Grp. Life Assur.

Blossom v. Smith

3 F. Cas. 744 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 26, 1854

In the month of May, 1S33, sixty-nine barrels of resin were shipped on board the schooner R. W. … Brown, owned by the respondents, at Wilmington, North Carolina, to be carried to the port of New York, and there delivered to the libelants, dangers of the sea only excepted, and the master issued the regular bills of lading

Sun Enterprises., Ltd. v. Train

394 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 9, 1975

TOWN DEFENDANTS The town defendants include the Town of Somers, New York; the councilmen of the Town Board of Somers; the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Somers; the members of the Planning Board of … and other materials into Brown Brook.”

J.R. Ex Rel. S.R. v. Board of Education of City of Rye School District

345 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 22, 2004

Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 207 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 ; 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982)). … See, e.g., Walczak, 142 F.3d at 130 (quoting Lunceford v. D.C.

Hawkins v. The Hattie Palmer

63 F. 1015 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 22, 1894

BROWN, District Judge. There is not to my mind the least evidence of any conversion of the libelant’s goods in this case. … They were, therefore, allowed to remain on board for still another day; and the next day Mr.

Grandison v. United States Postal Service

696 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 5, 1988

The second is Franchise Tax Board v. … January 25, 1988) (available on WESTLAW, 1988 WL 9906 ) (citing Brown v.

Serrano v. 900 5th Avenue Corp.

4 F. Supp. 2d 315 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1998

Defendants Brown Harris Stevens Residential Management (“BHS”) and 900 5th Avenue Corp. (“900 5th”) move to dismiss this employment discrimination case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 BHS claims that because it … See Burdi v.

Haight v. The Mayor

24 F. 93 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 1885

Brown, J. … These facts bring the case, so far as I can see, entirely within the decision in the case of Maxmilian v. The Mayor, 62 N.

Sobell v. Reed

327 F. Supp. 1294 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 20, 1971

Brown v. Peyton, 437 F.2d 1228, 1232 (4th Cir. 1971). … But they exist to the fullest extent consistent with prison discipline, security and “the punitive regimen of a prison * * Brown v. Peyton, 437 F.2d 1228, 1231 (4th Cir. 1971); Jackson v.

Gates v. Ryan

37 F. 154 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 18, 1888

Several large dealers testified that a discharge of 30,000 feet per day, board measure, had long been considered a reasonable rate of discharge. … Irzo v. Perkins, 10 Fed. Rep. 779; Neilsen v. Jesup, 30 Fed. Rep. 138; Reed v. Weld, 6 Fed. Rep. 304; Sprague v. West, Abb. Adm. 548 .

Application of Reconstruction Finance Corp.

106 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1952

bills of lading endorsed “on-board” by ocean-carrying vessels destined for United States ports. … Matter of Pierce v. Brown Buick Co., Inc., 258 App.Div. 679 , 17 N.Y.S.2d 889 , affirmed 283 N.Y. 669 , 28 N.E.2d 400 ; Matter of Lipman v.