Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.83s
744 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 22, 1990
United States v. Roberts, 869 F.2d 70, 73 (2d Cir.1989). In the instant case, an arrest warrant for Brown was executed on February 13, 1990. … The Court reserves decision on defendant Brown’s motion to suppress potentially incriminating, non-pedigree statements allegedly obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona and Edwards v. Arizona.
Cited 8 timesPublished69 F. Supp. 2d 518 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 11, 1999
See United States v. … United States v.
Cited 9 timesPublished676 F. Supp. 2d 220 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 18, 2009
Gates, 462 U.S. at 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (internal quotations omitted); see United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 326 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Smith, 9 F.3d 1007, 1012 (2d Cir.1993); Rivera v. … See, e.g., United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671, 675 (2d Cir.1988). In Franks v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation
356 F. Supp. 1380 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 27, 1972
Saylor v. Lindsley, 456 F.2d 896, 904 (2d Cir. 1972). In Protective Committee v. … In Florida Trailer & Equipment Co. v.
Reversed on other grounds by City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation, 495 F.2d 448 (1974)Cited 37 timesPublished717 F. Supp. 172 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 7, 1989
Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Board, 465 U.S. 75, 81 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 896 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). See 28 U.S.C. § 1738 . Accord, Kremer v. … Under the doctrine of Stone v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBoard of Managers of the 195 Hudson Street Condominium v. Jeffrey M. Brown Associates, Inc.
652 F. Supp. 2d 463 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 25, 2009
The Board seeks a declaration that it is entitled to recover from defendant Jeffrey M. Brown Associates (“JMB”) an outstanding state court judgment against non-party K & J Construction Co., L.P. … (See Answer of Brown, entered on Feb. 21, 2003, included herein as PL’s Ex. E.) JMB moved to dismiss pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 3211 (a)(1). (See Ne. Restoration Corp. v. K & J Constr.
Cited 24 timesPublished287 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 28, 1968
Background This action was commenced by plaintiff, Barbara Brown, against the unknown seller of 100 shares of Westec Corporation common stock and Gilligan, Will & Co. (hereinafter Gilligan). … Daniel v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 164 F.2d 815 (7th Cir. 1947); Crowley v. Commodity Exchange, 141 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1944).
Cited 47 timesPublishedBloomingburg Jewish Education Center v. Village of Bloomingburg
111 F. Supp. 3d 459 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 9, 2015
Tellabs, Inc. v. … See Brown v. City of Oneonta, N.Y., 221 F.3d 329, 337 (2d Cir.1999).
Cited 24 timesPublished57 F. Supp. 3d 345 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 2014
Daimler AG v. Bauman, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 746, 754 , 187 L.Ed.2d 624 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 2851# 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)). … To the extent that Plaintiff intended to bring suit against David Brown, the analysis herein is unchanged. .
Cited 21 timesPublished863 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 22, 1994
. § 688 et seq., and the unseaworthiness of the vessel the M/V RANGER, have been fully described in a prior opinion of this Court, familiarity with which is assumed. See Brown v. … Brown cited Milos v.
Cited 5 timesPublished252 F. Supp. 3d 255 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 2, 2017
See Nabi v. Hudson Grp. … See Lynch v. United Servs. Auto.
Cited 6 timesPublished882 F. Supp. 1424 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 28, 1995
Brown v. United States, 1995 WL 49266 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 1995). The defendant moves for reargument under S.D.N.Y. Civ.R. 3(j) or for relief from my previous ruling under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). … F/V Paul & Michelle, 868 F.2d 519 (1st Cir.1989); Gardiner v.
Cited 5 timesPublished775 F. Supp. 692 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 18, 1991
Beam Distilling Co. v. … Inc., 698 F.Supp. 1078, 1087 (S.D.N.Y.1988); Roebuck v. Guttman, 678 F.Supp. 68, 69 (S.D.N.Y.1988). Conclusion For the reasons stated, the action is dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. 1 . See Brown v. E.F.
Cited 3 timesPublished488 F. Supp. 2d 395 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 2007
Barnett v. Revere Smelting & Ref. Corp., 67 F.Supp.2d 378, 392 (S.D.N.Y.1999). Similarly, Brown has not presented adequate evidence that Boards was aware he had a mental condition that was a disability. … Any notice on or after Brown’s termination on February 10, 2004 is ineffective. See Scott v.
Cited 46 timesPublished321 F. Supp. 2d 598 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 2004
See United States v. Carr, 582 F.2d 242, 244 (2d Cir.1978); United States v. Bernstein, 533 F.2d 775, 786 (2d Cir.1976). … United States v. Gambino, 809 F.Supp. 1061, 1079 (S.D.N.Y.1992); see also Costello v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. National Football League
219 F. Supp. 2d 372 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 18, 2002
Foy v. Pratt & Whitney:, 127 F.3d 229 , 232-33 (2d Cir.1997) (citing Shafii v. British Airways, PLC, 83 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir.1996); Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. … Kwiatkowski v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedCunningham v. Local 30, International Union of Operating Engineers
234 F. Supp. 2d 383 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 10, 2002
See Brown v. … See Purgess v. Sharrock, 33 F.3d 134 (2d Cir.1994); Castellano v. Board of Trustees, 937 F.2d 752 (2d Cir.1991). The general standard for New York’s duty of fair representation is settled under New York case law.
Cited 21 timesPublished715 F. Supp. 66 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1988
DISCUSSION Relying on Bifulco v. … United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d 1013, 1025 (2d Cir. 1980); 1 see United States v. Alvarez-Porras, 643 F.2d 54 , 56 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Garcia-Perez v.
Cited 2 timesPublished73 F. Supp. 860 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 19, 1946
Jones v. United States, 137 U.S. 202, 212 , 11 S.Ct. 80 , 34 L.Ed. 691 ; Pearcy v. Strenahan, 205 U.S. 257, 265 , 27 S.Ct. 545 , 51 L.Ed. 793 . … The only case cited by counsel in which the precise question now raised was adjudicated is Eckert v. Elmhurst Contr.
Cited 4 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 351 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 1858
S. supreme court, in the case of Pratt v. Reed [19 How. (60 TJ.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna