Case law

In re Creative Finance Ltd.

543 B.R. 498 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 13, 2016

Board of Elections in City of New York, 984 F.2d 35, 39 (2d Cir.1993) (“Hirschfeld") (quoting Dubose v. … See Ofosu v.

Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Barasky

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 18, 2025

Elliott v. Frontier Props. (In re Lewis W. Shurtleff, Inc.), 778 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1986) (quoting Palmer Clay Prods. Co. v. … Brown, 297 U.S. 227, 229 (1936) (internal quotations omitted)). Had the Transfer not been made and had Mr.

Miami Metals I, Inc., et al.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 2021

Co. v. Stack Oil, Inc., 922 F.2d 118, 121 (2d Cir.1990) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)); see also Lipton v. … Schron v. Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 N.Y.3d 430, 436 (2013) (citing Slamow v. Del Col, 79 N.Y.2d 1016, 1018 (1992)).

Geron, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Savoretti

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 2025

See, e.g., Anhui Aido Garment Co., Ltd. v. … (quoting In re Hibbard Brown & Co., Inc., 217 B.R. 41, 46 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1998)); see also In re MF Glob. Inc., No. 11-2790, 2012 WL 3242533, at *5 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.

Ditech Holding Corporation

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 2023

See Green v. Mattingly, 585 F.3d 97, 101 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing Hoblock, 422 F.3d at 85). The first and forth requirements are the procedural in nature. See McKithen v. Brown, 481 F.3d 89, 89 (2d Cir. 2015). … Chada v. Chada, 756 A.2d 39, 42 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). A default judgment is on the merits and has preclusive effect under res judicata. Brown v. Bank of Am., No. 1858 WDA 2013, 2014 WL 10919554, at *5 (Pa. Super.

Miami Metals I, Inc., et al.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 13, 2021

See Sayers v. … See Anderson v.

Ditech Holding Corporation

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 16, 2025

Brown Assocs., Inc., 652 F. Supp. 2d 463, 470 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). Federal common law governs the preclusive effect of prior federal court judgments in federal-question cases.34 Taylor v. … See Ellul v.

Modern Land (China) Co., Limited and Zhang Peng

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 22, 2022

See Beveridge v. Vidunas (In re O’Reilly), 598 B.R. 784, 803 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2019). … In Lavie v. Ran, 406 B.R. 277, 286–87 (S.D.

Modern Land (China) Co., Limited and Zhang Peng

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 18, 2022

See Beveridge v. Vidunas (In re O’Reilly), 598 B.R. 784, 803 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2019). … In Lavie v. Ran, 406 B.R. 277, 286–87 (S.D.

AMR Corp. v. Committee of Retired Employees (In re AMR Corp.)

508 B.R. 296 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 18, 2014

See Hunt, Ltd. v. … (requiring Section 14.2 procedures for amendment, but requiring action by Board of Directors for suspension or termination).

Harbinger Capital Partners LLC v. Ergen (In re LightSquared Inc.)

504 B.R. 321 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 21, 2013

Ergen is the founder, the Executive Chairman of the boards of directors, an employee, and the majority owner of both DISH and EchoStar. As of November 30, 2012, Mr. … Benjamin v.

Celsius Network LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · May 23, 2025

Sherman v. Novak (In re Reilly), 245 B.R. 768, 773 (2d Cir. B.A.P. 2000). … Integrated Res., Inc. v. Ameritrust Co., N.A. (In re Integrated Res., Inc.), 157 B.R. 66, 70 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (citations omitted).

Harlem Multifamily LLC v. Eight-115 Associates, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 2021

The Complaint originally contained claims against the City of New York (the “City”), including its Environmental Control Board. … Tr. v. Apollo Global Mgmt., LLC (In re AOG Ent., Inc.), 569 B.R. 563, 573 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y 2017); Fried v. Lehman Bros. Real Estate Assocs., 496 B.R. 706, 711 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); N.Y. Com. Bank v.

Ditech Holding Corporation

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 28, 2025

Corp. v. … Brown, 583 S.E.2d 844, 847 (Ga. 2003) (“[B]ecause the debt that the conveyance was made to secure has not been fully paid, [the appellee] was not entitled to cancellation of the security deed.”); see also Mak v.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Co v. United States Department of the Treasury & Export Development Canada (In Re Motors Liquidation Co.)

460 B.R. 603 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 28, 2011

See, e.g., Lujan v. … Board of Educ. of City of New York, 492 F.3d 89, 96 (2d Cir.2007) (citing Morales v.

SunEdison, Inc. v. United States

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 2020

Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 231–32 (2003) (quoting U.S. CONST. amend. V). … “It is beyond dispute that ‘[t]axes and user fees . . . are not takings,’” Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 U.S. 595, 597 (2013) (quoting Brown v.

MF Global Holdings Ltd.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 2020

Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 231–32 (2003) (quoting U.S. CONST. amend. V). … “It is beyond dispute that ‘[t]axes and user fees . . . are not takings,’” Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 U.S. 595, 597 (2013) (quoting Brown v.

MF Global Holdings, Ltd., as Plan Administrator v. Harrington, in his capacity as United States Trust

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 2020

Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 231–32 (2003) (quoting U.S. CONST. amend. V). … “It is beyond dispute that ‘[t]axes and user fees . . . are not takings,’” Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 U.S. 595, 597 (2013) (quoting Brown v.

Tese-Milner v. Kim

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · May 17, 2021

Brown Counsel for Capstone Capital Group, LLC and Capstone Credit, LLC HONORABLE JAMES L. GARRITY, JR. … See Ellul v.

O'Toole v. Heinemann

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 2025

Ramos v. Baldor Specialty Foods, Inc., 687 F.3d 554, 558 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. … BCL § 719(a) “creates a cause of action against members of the board of directors of a corporation who authorize a dividend in contravention of” N.Y. BCL § 510. Atlanta Shipping Corp. v. Chem. Bank, 631 F.