Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysb

1,525 results

0.55s

  • Irving H. Picard, Esq., Trustee for the Substantiv v. UBS AG

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 2023

    UBS “agreed to stock LIF-USEP’s board of directors with UBS employees.” (Id. ¶ 98). LIF-USEP’s board of directors was stocked with UBS SA employees. (Id. ¶¶ 98, 260). … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stillwater Liquidating LLC v. Net Five at Palm Pointe, LLC (In re Stillwater Asset Backed Offshore Fund Ltd.)

    559 B.R. 563 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Sep 2, 2016

    V. … Id.; see also Alexander v. Board of Education of City of New York, 648 Fed.Appx. 118 , No. 15-1959, 2016 WL 2610009 (2d Cir. May 6, 2016) (summary order) (dismissing complaint where docu-ments contradicted allegations).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States Lines, Inc. v. GAC Marine Fuels Ltd. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)

    68 B.R. 690 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 1986

    Marine commenced an in rem admiralty action in the Supreme Court of Hong Kong against the debtor, pursuant to a Writ of Summons (Debtor’s Exhibit 4), for the payment of $173,750 allegedly owed it for fuel oil delivered on board … See Thomas v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • In Re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

    445 B.R. 143 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 22, 2011

    Its board instructed management that the transaction could only proceed if it were capital accretive. This directive from the board of Barclays was not communicated by anyone to the Court. … Ass’n v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Manolo Blahnik USA, Ltd.

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Aug 18, 2020

    The Petitioning Creditor’s board of directors is different from Parent’s and Affiliate’s boards of directors, aside from one member, Ms. Eva Kristina Hulsebus, who sits on both boards. (Id. ¶¶ 4, 7.) … See Katchen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Saint Vincents Catholic Med. Centers of Ny

    429 B.R. 139 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · May 14, 2010

    Plaintiffs in a New York State court proceeding (hereafter, “State Court Plaintiffs”) titled Stack, et al v. … Commodity Futures Trading Com. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Damon

    40 B.R. 367 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · May 17, 1984

    Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 368 , 86 S.Ct. 1531, 1534 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966); McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 191 , 69 S.Ct. 497, 499 , 93 L.Ed.2d 599 (1948); United States v. … Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748, 777 , 96 S.Ct. 1817 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). Absent proof of a misleading statement, “the state retains some authority to regulate.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Fairfield Sentry Limited (In Liquidation) v. Union Bancaire Privee, UBP SA

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 13, 2024

    Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 592 U.S. 351, 352, 141 S. Ct. 1017, 1019, 209 L. Ed. 2d 225 (2021) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A v. Brown, 564 U.S 915, 919, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 180 L. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011); Picard v. BNP Paribas S.A.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re RLR Celestial Homes, Inc.

    108 B.R. 36 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1989

    Benevides v. Alexander (In re Alexander), 670 F.2d 885 (9th Cir.1982). … See also Bank of Marin v. England, 385 U.S. 99, 101 , 87 S.Ct. 274, 276 , 17 L.Ed.2d 197 (1966) (“[t]he trustee succeeds only to such rights as the bankrupt possessed”). Kopelman v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Authentic Hansom Cabs, Ltd. v. Nisselson (In re Fayolle)

    300 B.R. 843 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Sep 2, 2003

    Garage, Inc. v. … .”); see also Bozewicz v. Nash Metalware Co., 284 A.D.2d 288 , 725 N.Y.S.2d 671 (2d Dep’t 2001); Jovana Spaghetti House, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Unique Funding Solutions, LLC

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Citibank, N.A.

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Bloomingdale's Inc.

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Bygaph, Inc.

    56 B.R. 596 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 10, 1986

    Nor would notice of the assignment by Bygaph to RMR have been revealed from examination of the premises or inquiry of those who were found there, for the restaurant was boarded up and there was no indication on the property … See First National Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, 21 N.Y.2d 630 , 290 N.Y.S.2d 721 , 237 N.E.2d 868 (1968).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Columbus Properties, Inc

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Colgate University

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Kossoff

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fairfield Sentry Limited (In Liquidation) v. Union Bancaire Privee, UBP SA

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 29, 2025

    Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 592 U.S. 351, 352, 141 S. Ct. 1017, 1019, 209 L. Ed. 2d 225 (2021) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A v. Brown, 564 U.S 915, 919, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 180 L. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011); Picard v. BNP Paribas S.A. (In re BLMIS), 594 B.R. 167, 190 (Bankr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Albert Togut, Not Individually but Solely in His C v. Fordham University School of Law

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2025

    N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“[T]he Debtor previously appeared before the City of Syracuse Board of Assessment Review (‘Assessment Board’) contesting the tax assessments on the Properties pursuant to Article 5 of New York … agreed to formal settlements with such review board).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.