Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,281 results
0.37s
District Court, N.D. New York · Feb 4, 2025
Plaintiff further requests that the Court order that he be examined by “qualified GSS Doctor Moustafa Hassan whom has approved this needed surgery…” Id. … involved in either plaintiff's medical treatment, or scheduling and approving medical procedures, a request for injunctive relief against non-parties is available only under very limited circumstances, none of which are clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownPerrone v. Catamount Ski Resort, LLC
District Court, N.D. New York · Jul 18, 2023
Defendants, in seeking summary judgment, “bear[] the burden of establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts establish [their] right to judgment as a matter of law.” … Scher is qualified to give expert testimony regarding Plaintiff’s injuries and mechanism of injury. See Dkt. No. 64-13 at 8; see also Jeffery v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Dec 12, 2024
The RICO statute sets forth a list of acts that qualify as racketeering activity and includes “any act or threat involving . . . extortion . . . which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more … In furtherance of this goal, the FDCPA “establishes certain rights for consumers whose debts are placed in the hands of professional debt collectors for collection.” DeSantis v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBeckwith v. The City of Syracuse
District Court, N.D. New York · Sep 30, 2025
Plaintiff waived immunity and testified about the events leading up to his arrest and his arrest. Def. Stat. ¶ 136; see Grand Jury Tr. at 40:19–73:1. … For malicious prosecution claims under New York law, “any termination of a criminal prosecution, such that the criminal charges may not be brought again, qualifies as a favorable termination, so long as the circumstances
Cited 0 timesUnknownThe Cleveland Marble Mosaic Company v. Bette & Cring, L.L.C.
District Court, N.D. New York · Aug 9, 2021
First, the Second Circuit has made clear that even repeated business activities while physically present in New York are insufficient to establish that a party was doing business within New York. … Clearly, under such circumstances, if plaintiff can be immune from the dictates of the statute, then the statute becomes meaningless. Berkshire Eng'g Corp., 29 Misc. 2d at 1014–15.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHurley v. Ithaca City School District - Board of Education
District Court, N.D. New York · Apr 22, 2020
LEGAL STANDARD FOR INITIAL REVIEW OF COMPLAINT Ordinarily, the finding that Plaintiff does not qualify for IFP status would end the Court’s discussion, and Plaintiff, in light of his pro se status … (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Jan 30, 2020
Then, as Defendant No. 30, Plaintiff names a used auto parts company that “clearly was involved with co-conspirators in undermining [Plaintiff’s] efforts to improve [his] vehicle . . . .” Id. ¶ 38. … claim under § 1985 has four elements: ‘(1) a conspiracy; (2) for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Mar 20, 2024
Plaintiff alleges that, beginning in 2004, he was eligible and qualified for professorship. See id. … Defendant does not contend that Plaintiff was not qualified for any of the positions he held. See generally Dkt. Nos. 11, 21. 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknown701 F. Supp. 2d 224 · District Court, N.D. New York · Apr 1, 2010
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 601 F.3d 143, 147 (2d Cir.2010) (“the ‘basic purpose [of FOIA] reflected a general philosophy of full agency disclosure unless information is exempted under clearly delineated … Courts in this circuit addressing the deliberative process privilege within the context of discovery disputes, albeit in non-APA actions, have found that the privilege is qualified.
Cited 13 timesPublishedVellano v. The Standard Life Insurance Company of New York
District Court, N.D. New York · Aug 4, 2020
The right to establish and enforce rules and procedures for the administration of the Group Policy and any claim under it; 3. … According to Vellano, "[r]educing benefits by offsetting business losses against W-2 income is precisely the kind of circumstances which must, under the cited DOL regulations, be clearly and understandably set forth in the
Cited 0 timesUnknownCosgrove v. Board of Education of the Niskayuna Central School District
175 F. Supp. 2d 375 · District Court, N.D. New York · Jul 3, 2001
Plaintiffs’ failure to qualify for an injunction under IDEA should disqualify them from an injunction under any other provision of law.” Defs.’ Mem. of Law, p. 3. … As the Plaintiffs’ counsel pointed out at oral argument, the determination of the IHO clearly establishes that there are, at the very least, sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make a fair ground for litigation
Cited 15 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Oct 7, 2025
Having reviewed plaintiff's IFP application, the undersigned concludes that he financially qualifies to proceed IFP.' See Dkt. No. 3. Il. … “An action is ‘frivolous’ when either: (1) ‘the factual contentions are clearly baseless, such as when allegations are the product of delusion "lor fantasy’; or (2) ‘the claim is based on an indisputably meritless legal
Cited 0 timesUnknownMothersell v. City of Syracuse
289 F.R.D. 389 · District Court, N.D. New York · Mar 8, 2013
Therefore, plaintiff has not met his burden of establishing that there are “questions of law or fact common to the class” (“commonality”) under Rule 23(a)(2), nor has he established “that questions of law or fact common to … Armstrong saw him clearly — he said their “eyes met”— and recognized him as Mothersell. After they entered the apartment, Det. MacDerment told Det.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRichards v. United States of America
District Court, N.D. New York · Jun 27, 2022
(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). … Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., 25 F.3d 1124, 1128 (2d Cir. 1994) (“It is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original, and renders it of no legal effect.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Feb 1, 2021
Plaintiff's claim against Warden Artuz is that he “fail [sic] to qualify as warden.” … Accordingly, Plaintiff's wherefore these issues are not isolated and clearly establishes conclusory allegations of wider misconduct by the Albany a monell claim.” (Dkt.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Sep 7, 2022
deliberate indifference on behalf Syracuse, because DPS does not qualify as “an appropriate person who can rectify a violation of Title IX.” … Nov. 26, 2018) (“[A] lapse of a month before [d]efendant contacted [plaintiff to open an investigation into her claims] was not clearly unreasonable.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownGates v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, N.D. New York · Mar 17, 2021
Reddy—which establishes that plaintiff's two visits with Dr. … Reddy’s notes, clearly indicate that plaintiff's HIV and kidney issue are well controlled by treatment and medication.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMomentive Performance Materials USA, Inc. v. Astrocosmos Metallurgical, Inc.
659 F. Supp. 2d 332 · District Court, N.D. New York · Sep 23, 2009
Despite this assertion, Plaintiffs amended complaint clearly states that it “is the assignee of all of Silicones business unit of GE’s rights and claims of any nature against any third parties.” … Precondition: CLEGC and/or AC must be technically qualified and competitive. You and I will have to work out the contract and submit it to the respective management for approval and signature.
Cited 4 timesPublished122 F. 266 · District Court, N.D. New York · Apr 3, 1903
Hornstein, the alleged bankrupt, and he duly qualified as such. … To maintain this proceeding they must establish that Hornstein was insolvent, and had committed an act of bankruptcy within the four months preceding the filing of the petition.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Feb 10, 2025
"The standard of proof for establishing eligibility for orphan petitions is that of a preponderance of the evidence. … "Congress may delegate to executive officials the discretionary authority to admit noncitizens 'immune from judicial inquiry or interference.' . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna