Case law

Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15

282 F. Supp. 70 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 30, 1968

Campbell, 358 F.2d 215 (5 Cir. 1966); Nesbit v. Statesville City Board of Education, 232 F.Supp. 288 (W.D.N.C.1964), decision vacated, 345 F.2d 333 (4 Cir. 1965); Carroll v. … Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429, 433 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L.Ed. 475 (1952); Thomas v. Gay, 169 U.S. 264, 276 , 18 S.Ct. 340 , 42 L.Ed. 740 (1898).

Jones v. Bay Shore Union Free School District

170 F. Supp. 3d 420 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 16, 2016

While a Superintendent may be a decision-maker, the Board of Education is the final policymaker. See Hill v. N.Y. … act only within the parameters of certain policies set by the Chancellor of the Board of Education and by the Board itself’) (overruled on other grounds by Frankel v.

545 Halsey Lane Properties, LLC v. Town of Southampton

39 F. Supp. 3d 326 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 19, 2014

The Planning Board is a Board created by the Board of Southampton pursuant to New York Town Law § 271. … Were the law otherwise, the federal court would be transmogrified into a supercharged version of a local zoning board—a zoning board on steroids, as it were.”); McDonald v.

United States v. Schwartz

143 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 15, 1956

This local board apparently complied with that regulation. … A registrant is not entitled to the aid of counsel before a local board. United States v. Pitt, 3 Cir., 144 F.2d 169 ; Peterson v. United States, 6 Cir., 173 F.2d 111 ; Niznik v. United States, 6 Cir., 173 F.2d 328 .

Payne v. Huntington Union Free School District

219 F. Supp. 2d 273 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 26, 2002

Louis v. … In Barstow v.

United States v. Rodriguez

841 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 3, 1994

On various occasions, officers had seen the defendant Renaldo Rodriguez, then known to them only as “Ray,” enter or leave the subject apartment carrying brown paper bags. … United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576 , 587 n. 10, 101 S.Ct. 2524 , 2531 n. 10, 69 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981) (quoting United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 26 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 380 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948)).

General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.

35 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 11, 1940

Brown Instrument Co. v. General Electric Co., 35 F.Supp. 29 . It dismissed the complaint of the Brown Company and granted a decree in favor of General Electric against Honeywell. … Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399 , 43 S.Ct. 458 , 67 L.Ed. 719 . Bassick etc., v. Adams, etc., 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 285 .

Dowdy v. Barnhart

213 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 29, 2002

. § 405 (g); Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 61-62 (2d Cir.1999). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla.” Richardson v. … It means “ ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” Brown, 174 F.3d at 62-63 .

Swinton v. City of New York

785 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 28, 2011

DA Brown. All claims against Queens DA Richard Brown in his official capacity are barred. … For the same reason, the Amended Complaint’s allegations do not support DA Brown’s potential liability as a “municipal policymaker.” See Walker v. City of New York, 974 F.2d 293, 299-300 (2d Cir.1992); Hewitt v.

Pena v. LeFerve

419 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 14, 1976

In Rugendorf v. … In contrast, Brown does bear resemblance to the present case.

Homefront Organization, Inc. v. Motz

570 F. Supp. 2d 398 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 14, 2008

Kittay v. Giuliani, 112 F.Supp.2d 342, 348 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (citing Marchi v. Bd. of Cooperative Educ. Servs., 173 F.3d 469, 478 (2d Cir.1999), aff'd, 252 F.3d 645 (2d Cir.2001)); Thomas v. … Inc. v.

Coggins v. County of Nassau

615 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 5, 2009

Employees, UMD, ILA, AFL-CIO v. Town Bd. of Huntington, 31 F.3d 1191, 1194 (2d Cir.1994) (citation omitted) (emphasis in original). Thus, as the Supreme Court noted in Board of Regents v. … .”); Baker v.

Hampton Bays Connections, Inc. v. Duffy

212 F.R.D. 119 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 2, 2003

Mosley v. Jablonsky, 209 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y.2002). … Circuit in Barrow v.

Dukes v. Cold Spring Harbor Central School District Board of Education

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 29, 2021

v. … See Nat’l Law Ctr. on Homelessness & Poverty, R.I. v.

United Derrickmen & Riggers Assoc. Local Union No. 197 of the International Ass'n of Bridge v. Local No. 1 Bricklayers & Allied Craftsman

119 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 14, 2000

Mortise v. United States 102 F.3d 693, 697 (2d Cir.1996); Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown *174 & Co., 947 F.2d 595, 600 (2d Cir.1991). … Jones, 460 U.S. 669 , 103 S.Ct. 1453 , 75 L.Ed.2d 368 (1983) (claim against union for coercing employer to breach employment contract preempted by NLRA); Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 187 Ins. v

Gluck v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.

680 F. Supp. 2d 406 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 22, 2010

This removal prompted the Disputed Board Members to file Gluck v. … When the Disputed Board Members brought Gluck v.

Goosby v. Town Bd. of the Town of Hempstead, NY

956 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 20, 1997

Lewis v. … Bush v.

United States Ex Rel. Gutterson v. Thompson

47 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 23, 1942

Neither the Parole Board nor the Court can breathe life into a sentence which has been finally terminated. In Clark v. … Zerbst v.

Rini v. Zwirn

886 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 5, 1995

’ positions by Board resolution. … See Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc., 974 F.2d 270, 276 (2d Cir.1992) (citing Katara v. D.E. Jones Commodities Inc., 835 F.2d 966, 970-71 (2d Cir.1987); see also Browning Ave. Realty Corp. v.

Marotta v. Road Carrier Local 707 Welfare Fund

100 F. Supp. 2d 149 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 16, 2000

I would like to meet with the Board of Trustees concerning this matter. (Compl.Exh.4). … Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1726 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam), and strict adherence to such periods of limitations “is the best guarantee of evenhanded administration of the law,” Mohasco Corp. v.