Case law

Penlyn Development Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor

51 F. Supp. 2d 255 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 16, 1999

of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Sarkis v. Sava

599 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 12, 1984

Shamon v. INS, 735 F.2d 1015, 1017 (6th Cir.1984). Cf. Kashani v. INS, 547 F.2d 376, 379 (7th Cir.1977). … Sarkis v. Nelson, 585 F.Supp. 235, 240 (E.D.N.Y.1984).

Ex parte Platt

253 F. 413 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 23, 1918

The question is therefore limited to the familiar proposition, based upon the decision in Angelus v. Sullivan, 246 Fed. 54 , 156 C. C. … Gegiow v. Uhl, 239 U. S. 3 , 36 Sup. Ct. 2, 60 L. Ed. 114 ; United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 253 , 25 Sup. Ct. 644, 49 L.

Local 553, Transport Workers Union v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

544 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 16, 1982

June 29, 1982), quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Defendant is correct in stating that the National Mediation Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) has exclusive jurisdiction to decide representation disputes. See Air Line Pilots Ass’n v.

United States Ex Rel. Broker v. Baird

39 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 30, 1941

Filomio v. Powell et al., D.C., 38 F.Supp. 183 . … In Arbitman v.

Cincotta v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist.

313 F. Supp. 3d 386 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 14, 2018

Dabney v. … Furthermore, while Cross was a decision maker as a member of the Board, she was only one of five members of the Board. See Barbano v.

County of Nassau v. New York

724 F. Supp. 2d 295 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 14, 2010

The NYS BOE then directed local election boards to choose one of the certified systems to use. (Id. ¶ 74.) … State Conference of N.A.A.C.P. v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1172 (11th Cir.2008) (“Reading HAVA Title III as a whole, we are not convinced that its objectives are to federalize voter identification standards.

Collins v. Scully

878 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 14, 1995

Relying on Santucci v. … See Carroll v. Hoke, 695 F.Supp. 1435, 1439-40 (E.D.N.Y.1988) (citing Luce v.

Able v. United States

863 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 1994

Warner, 481 F.2d 642, 643 (9th Cir.1973) (constitutional issues “singularly suited to a judicial forum and clearly inappropriate to an administrative board”). The court adheres to its holding in Able I. … Able I, 847 F.Supp. at 1042 (citing Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348, 355 , 100 S.Ct. 594, 600 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980)). The free speech claim is sufficient.

Dorcely v. Wyandanch Union Free School District

665 F. Supp. 2d 178 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2009

See Brown v. Scarsdale Vill. Hall, No. 95 CIV. 4488 DLC, 1996 WL 445360 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y. … See Strong v. Board of Educ., 902 F.2d 208 , 211 (2d Cir.1990); see also Ezekwo v. New York City Health & Hosp.

South Nassau Building Corp. v. Town Board of the Town of Hempstead

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 24, 2025

See Pakdel v. … In a footnote to this final clause, it cited two New York Court of Appeals decisions— Cummings v. Town Board of North Castle, 466 N.E.2d 147 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984), and Buitenkant v. Robohm, 505 N.Y.S.2d 884 (App.

King v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare of United States

224 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 3, 1964

Curtis Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 167 ; Lehmann v. Acheson, 3 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 592 . … Nor is it as strong as Spiegel v.

United States ex rel. Levy v. Cain

55 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 20, 1944

The relator also relies upon: Goodwin v. Rowe, D.C., 49 F.Supp. 703 ; Ex; parte Stewart, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 410 ; Benesch v. Underwood, 6 Cir., 132 F.2d 430 ; United States v. … Supp. 265 ; Johnson v.

Royall v. United States Postal Service

624 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 25, 1985

See Valentino v. United States Postal Service, 674 F.2d 56, 65 (D.C.Cir.1982); Brown v. Brown, 528 F.Supp. 686, 689 (D.N.J.1981). … Brown v. Brown, supra, 528 F.Supp. at 691 -92 (quoting Love v. Pullman, supra, 404 U.S. at 527 , 92 S.Ct. at 619 ). In this case, basic equity requires that plaintiff’s two-day lapse be forgiven.

Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Secretary, United States Department of Education

942 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 17, 1996

See Everson v. Board of Education of Ewing, 330 U.S. 1, 8-9 , 67 S.Ct. 504, 507-08 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (citing, inter alia, Macaulay, History of England, vol. … In Board of Education of Central School District v.

Franklin National Bank v. L. B. Meadows & Co.

318 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 25, 1970

Groesbeck, 142 F.2d 422, 427 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 737 , 65 S,Ct. 36, 89 L.Ed. 590 (1944); Goodman v. H. Hentz & Co., 265 F.Supp. 440, 445 (N.D.Ill. 1967) (15 U.S.C. § 78o(b) (5) (E)); Brown v. … Crown Stove Works, 236 F.Supp. 572, 573 (N.D.Ill.1964); Brown v. Bullock, 194 F.Supp. 207, 224 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, *1343 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1961).

McMillan v. Tug Jane A. Bouchard Official 56872

885 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 9, 1995

See Brown, supra, 1994 WL 714445 , at *2. … See Brown v. OMI Corp., No. 92 *469 CIV. 5371, 1994 WL 39026 , at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 1994).

Nature's Bounty, Inc. v. Basic Organics

432 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 23, 1977

At trial, a proprietor of a health food store, Renee Browne, testified on behalf of plaintiff as a resale purchaser of its “B-100”. … V.

Paulsen v. Renaissance Equity Holdings, LLC

849 F. Supp. 2d 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 27, 2012

, Inc. v. … NLRB v.

Vega-Ruiz v. Northwell Health

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 17, 2023

Accordingly, the Court finds that an across-the-board reduction of 70% of plaintiff’s application is fair and reasonable. See Matusick v. Erie Cnty. … Supp. 3d 256, 258 (E.D.N.Y. 2021) (applying 90% across-the-board reduction); Williams v. Epic Sec. Corp., 368 F. Supp. 3d 651, 661 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (applying 66% and 70% across-the-board reduction).