Case law

Q1 Corp. v. Reichenstein (In Re Q1 Corp.)

28 B.R. 647 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 1983

Frizer v. … Civil Aeronautics Board; In re: Braniff Airways, Inc., 27 B.R. 231 at 233 (D.C.N.D.Texas 1983), aff’d 700 F.2d 214 (5th Cir.1983); The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The Stouffer Corp.

Mohsin v. Ebert

626 F. Supp. 2d 280 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 2009

See Habeas Memo, at 67-70 (citing Davis v. Brown, 87 N.Y.2d 626, 630 , 641 N.Y.S.2d 819 , 664 N.E.2d 884 (1996) (citing Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 673 , 102 S.Ct. 2083 , 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982))). … Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 78 (2d Cir.1997).

Bonafide Builders Inc. v. Colony Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 14, 2023

Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 356 (2d Cir. 2011). … See, Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v.

Honeywood v. Rockefeller

214 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 18, 1963

Wright v. Rockefeller, U.S.D.C.S.D.N.Y., 211 F.Supp. 460 . … This case is far different from Gomillion v. Light-foot, 364 U.S. 339 , 81 S.Ct. 125 , 5 L.Ed.2d 110 (1962), urged by plaintiffs as a compelling precedent.

Parikh v. New York City Transit Authority

681 F. Supp. 2d 371 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 2, 2010

Celotex Corp. v. … Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 710 (2d Cir.1998).

Clorox Co. v. Winthrop

836 F. Supp. 983 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 3, 1993

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Relying on California Packing Corp. v.

Hernandez

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 5, 2026

Timmerman, 454 U.S. 83, 87 (1981); see Brown v. Alexander, 2024 WL 5141852, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2024) (“Plaintiff seems to seek the federal criminal prosecution of the defendants. … Bd., 341 F.3d 155, 162 (2d Cir. 2003) (bank manager suffered injury when regulatory board found she engaged in misconduct, releasing prohibition order against her, “a death knell for [Manager’s] career in an industry dependent

Wang v. State University of New York Health Sciences Center at Stony Brook

470 F. Supp. 2d 178 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 23, 2006

In July 2001, SUNY’s Clinical Competency Committee (“CCC”) informed the American Board of Anesthesiology (“ABA”) that Plaintiffs performance was “inadequate.” (Defs.’ Stmt. ¶ 9.) … (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Grady v.

Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. The County of Suffolk

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 25, 2023

See Int’l Code Council, Inc. v. … Matson v. Bd. of Educ., 631 F.3d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)).

United States v. Reyes

District Court, E.D. New York · May 21, 2024

(quoting Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843–44)); Brown v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., 755 F.3d 154, 161 n.4 (2d Cir. 2014) (quoting Mead Corp., 533 U.S. at 227 for the same). … United States v.

Jackson v. City of New York

939 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 16, 2013

See Lennon v. … Cerrone v. Brown, 246 F.3d 194, 202-03 (2d Cir.2001) (quotation marks and internal citations omitted) (emphasis in original).

Charles v. TransUnion, LLC.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2022

Ct. at 2200; see also Spokeo, Inc v. … Feb. 3, 2022) (Brown, J.) (finding conclusory allegations of “mental and emotional pain, anguish, humiliation, and embarrassment of credit denial” fail to demonstrate standing in the FCRA context).

Ideal World Marketing, Inc. v. Duracell, Inc.

15 F. Supp. 2d 239 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 1998

Data Depot, Inc., markets a product called "PC PowerCheck,” which is a circuit board that, when connected to a computer, enables the user to determine whether the computer’s output voltages are too high or too low. … .”); Larsen v.

Vicente v. Superintendent of Eastern NY Correctional Facility

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 1, 2023

Hyman v. Brown, 927 F.3d 639, 643, 656 (2d Cir. 2019) (citing House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518, 536 (2006)). The petitioner makes no such claim. III. … Hyman v. Brown, 927 F.3d 639, 643, 656 (2d Cir. 2019) (citing House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518, 536 (2006)). IV.

Halloway v. City of New York

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 7, 2025

The Kadushin Declaration asserts that these draft CCRB closing reports are covered by the deliberative process privilege because the reports are “merely recommendations provided to the CCRB Board to assist in the Board … In Walls v.

Hyek v. Field Support Services, Inc.

702 F. Supp. 2d 84 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 25, 2010

Co. v. … Board of Elections of the City of New York, 224 F.3d 149, 157 (2d Cir.2000), and should thus be granted with caution in employment discrimination cases. Schiano v.

BASF Corporation v. Master Collision Inc. and Jay Lipari as administrator of the Estate of Bob Lipari

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 24, 2025

Brown for Report and Recommendation, is Plaintiff BASF Corporation’s (“BASF” or “Plaintiff”) motion for a default judgment against Defendant Master Collision Inc. … On August 26, 2025, Judge Brown referred Plaintiff’s motion to this Court for a Report and Recommendation. See Electronic Order Dated Aug. 26, 2025.

Charles v. Equifax Information Services, LLC.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2022

Ct. at 2200; see also Spokeo, Inc v. … Feb. 3, 2022) (Brown, J.) (finding conclusory allegations of “mental and emotional pain, anguish, humiliation, and embarrassment of credit denial” fail to demonstrate standing in the FCRA context).

Charles v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2022

Ct. at 2200; see also Spokeo, Inc v. … Feb. 3, 2022) (Brown, J.) (finding conclusory allegations of “mental and emotional pain, anguish, humiliation, and embarrassment of credit denial” fail to demonstrate standing in the FCRA context).

John-Cedeno v. New York City Health + Hospitals Corporation

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 21, 2024

. § 1332(a)(2); see Windward Bora LLC v. … Browne, 110 F.4th 120, 127 (2d Cir. 2024) (explaining that the limiting clause in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) “prevent[s] diversity jurisdiction in cases between a U.S. citizen and a permanent resident domiciled in the same