Case law

Roberto's Fruit Market, Inc. v. Schaffer

13 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 16, 1998

For example, in Moscowitz v. Brown, 850 F.Supp. 1185 (S.D.N.Y.1994), the Court dismissed a complaint after giving the plaintiff three opportunities to replead. … Pahmer v. Greenberg, 926 F.Supp. 287 , 294 n. 2 (E.D.N.Y.1996), affirmed sub nom., Shapiro v. Cantor, 123 F.3d 717 (2d Cir.1997) (citing Vicom, Inc. v.

Hussey v. Highe School-George Wasting-House Voc & Tech High School

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 2023

Matson v. Bd. of Educ., 631 F.3d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104–105 (1976)); see Harris v.

Derosa v. Computer Credit, Inc.

295 F. Supp. 3d 290 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 28, 2018

(ECF No. 19-1 (Ex. 1, Jackson v. Comput. Credit, Inc. , No. 613935/2016E (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Suffolk Cty. Nov. 22, 2017) (citation omitted) ); accord ECF No. 19-2 (Ex. 2, Brown v. Comput. … See, e.g., Taylor v.

Moussa v. Sullivan

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 25, 2022

Smith v. Brown, 296 F. Supp. 3d 648, 661 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Simpson v. Town of Warwick Police Dept., 159 F. Supp. 3d 419, 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)). … .”); Livingston v.

Ticali v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn

41 F. Supp. 2d 249 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 24, 1999

On appeal before the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to reconsider the denial, an ALJ held, in an opinion issued on December 4, 1996 (“ALJ Op.”), that the plaintiff had “good cause” to leave her employment … V.

United States v. Rivieccio

661 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 13, 1987

Three of the defendants in the United States action were members of HYFIN’s Board of Directors who have pleaded guilty to conspiracy and mail fraud charges in connection with the real estate scheme. … Yet the Federal savings and loan asociations are under the independent regulation of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Id.; accord H.R.Rep.

Chingo Garcia v. Hatchet Works Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York · May 22, 2024

v. … See Brown, 76 N.Y.2d at 179 (“A violation of [§ 240(1)] is not the equivalent of negligence and does not give rise to an inference of negligence.”); Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro- Elec.

Stein Fur Dyeing Co. v. Windsor Fur Dyeing Co.

31 F.2d 128 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 4, 1929

American Cone & Wafer Co. v. Denaro (C. C. A.) 297 F. 913 ; Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co. (D. C.) 207 F. 85 ; Veneer Machinery Co. v. Grand Rapids Chair Co. (C. C. A.) 227 F. 419 . … Providence Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. (76 U. S.) 788, 19 L. Ed. 566 ; Giant Powder Co. v. Powder Works, 98 U. S. 126 , 25 L. Ed. 77 ; Century Electric Co. v. Westinghouse E. & Mfg. Co. (C. C.

Kim v. Korean Air lines

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 14, 2021

Consider first that any of the Korean Air attendants involved in preparing and serving food on the flight must have performed part of their job duties and boarded at JFK. … In Selke v.

Thomas v. Lord

396 F. Supp. 2d 327 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 31, 2005

Brown v. Greiner, 409 F.3d 523, 533 (2d Cir.2005); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). C. THE PETITIONER’S CLAIMS 1. … Jackson v.

Crown Castle NG East LLC v. The Town of Oyster Bay

District Court, E.D. New York · May 12, 2020

P. 72(b); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. … Universal Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New Rochelle, N.Y., 286 F.

B.K. v. New York City Department of Education

12 F. Supp. 3d 343 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2014

See M.H. v. … In M.H. v.

De Londono v. Aerovias Nacionales de Colombia, S.A.

774 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 16, 1991

See Gayda v. LOT Polish Airlines, 702 F.2d 424, 425 (2d Cir.1983); Butz v. … (corporation ordinarily resident at "seat of board of directors"). .

MacKenzie v. Portuondo

208 F. Supp. 2d 302 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 20, 2002

Krajci saw that two brown paper bags and two cans of beer. He threw one of the cans at her and ordered her to open it. He drank the beer while he drove. … The Petitioner took a glass vial from one of the brown bags, and used a pen from Ms. Krajci’s purse to smoke the vial’s contents.

Keith v. Austin Coins, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 18, 2025

Keith v. Austin Coins, Inc., et al., No. 23-CV-9461 (lead case); AnnaMarie Eakins v. Austin Lloyd, Inc., et al., No. 24-CV-0206; Bobby Nowell v. Austin Coins, Inc., et al., No. 24-CV-0218; John H. Fikse v. … Painters’ Tr. v.

Sarf v. Town of Huntington

702 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 14, 1988

In Lee v. … See Barr v.

SymQuest Group, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

186 F. Supp. 3d 257 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 16, 2016

At its Board of Directors meeting on June 1, 2015, SymQuest approved the bid submitted by Konica Minolta for the purchase of 100% of SymQuest’s stock, although SymQuest would remain a separate corporate entity. (Id.) … Corp. v.

Ford v. Shalala

87 F. Supp. 2d 163 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 1999

Rooney v. Shalala, 879 F.Supp. 252, 255 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). In Board of Regents v. … (citing Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 , 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976)).

In Re Kings County Lighting Co.

72 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 3, 1947

Very recently the Supreme Court, Bethlehem Steel Co. et al. v. New York State Labor Relations Board, 67 S.Ct. 1026 , dealt with a similar controversy in another field. And Mr. … Board of Trade v. United States, 1912, 314 U.S. 534, 548 , 62 S.Ct. 366 , 86 L.Ed. 432 ; National Broadcasting Co. v.

Nucatola v. Eastport-South Manor Central School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 29, 2022

EASTPORT-SOUTH MANOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, and EASTPORT-SOUTH MANOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD … including Plaintiff’s misconduct in February 2015 and incidents of poor performance; and (2) the impact of the Second 1 Circuit’s decision in Collins v.