Case law

Stein Fur Dyeing Co. v. Windsor Fur Dyeing Co.

31 F.2d 128 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 4, 1929

American Cone & Wafer Co. v. Denaro (C. C. A.) 297 F. 913 ; Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co. (D. C.) 207 F. 85 ; Veneer Machinery Co. v. Grand Rapids Chair Co. (C. C. A.) 227 F. 419 . … Providence Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. (76 U. S.) 788, 19 L. Ed. 566 ; Giant Powder Co. v. Powder Works, 98 U. S. 126 , 25 L. Ed. 77 ; Century Electric Co. v. Westinghouse E. & Mfg. Co. (C. C.

LTO Properties Corp. v. Currey

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 12, 2024

See Finkel v. … Bank, FSB v. Thompson, 631 F.App’x 13, 15 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Rooney, 19 N.Y.S.3d 543, 544 (2d Dep’t 2015)).

Bennett v. Dill

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 23, 2022

Brown v. … There does not appear to be Second Circuit case law interpreting the “actual innocence” standard in the context of civil confinement, nor have other circuits enunciated a clear rule.11 Brown v.

Campbell v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

69 F. Supp. 2d 380 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 8, 1999

Id. at 209-10 (quoting Glus v. G.C. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (c)(3); Cas-tellano v. Board of Trustees of Police Officers’ Variable Supplements Fund, 937 F.2d 752 , 758 (2d Cir.1991).

Ram v. Lal

906 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 21, 2012

In 2011, three of the four Federal Defendants in this case brought a lawsuit in state court (“the State Case”) 11 against the Temple, the Members of the Management Committee and the Board of Trustees elected on June 14, 2009 … In Hindu Temple Society, this court confronted a similar dispute relating to the control of a Hindu Temple in Queens, where a dispute arose as to the legitimacy of the Board of Trustees. Id. at 370 .

Boesen v. United Sports Publications, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 2, 2020

Kelly-Brown plaintiff rejected it. Rule 68 Offer, ECF No. 22-3 (annexed as Ex. B to Declaration of Moish E. Peltz (“Peltz Decl.”)). v. … Sept. 18, 2015), misconstrues the Second Circuit’s decision in Kelly- Brown, which expressly held that fair use may be adjudicated on a motion to dismiss “where the facts necessary to establish the defense are evident on

Trustees of the Building Trades Educational Benefit Fund, The Building Trades Annuity Benefit Fund, Building Trades Welfare Benefit Fund and the Electrician's Retirement Fund v. Preferred Electric II Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2025

See City of New York v. … Millea v. Metro-North R.R.

King v. Federal National Mortgage Association

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 10, 2025

Brown. … Foreman v.

Lifchits v. Key 4U Transporation Corp. Bus

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 20, 2024

Aish’s notes further explain that plaintiff “had two episodes of vomiting with brown material last month[.]” Id. at ECF page 18. Dr. Aish advised plaintiff “to call Dr. … Defendant has submitted the expert report of board-certified gastroenterologist Dr. Bradley Rieders. See Dkt. 123-16. Dr. Rieders explains that gastric ulcers are commonly caused by H.

Richards v. United Riverhead Terminal Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2020

“[T]he plaintiff’s and comparator’s circumstances must bear a reasonably close resemblance,” Brown v. Daikin Am. … V.

P & L Development, LLC v. Gerber Products Company

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 10, 2022

Prods., Ltd. v. … Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 124). Findings as to sealing are determined by engaging in a three-step analysis.

In Re Air Disaster Near Cove Neck, Ny

774 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 20, 1991

See Gayda v. LOT Polish Airlines, 702 F.2d 424, 425 (2d Cir.1983); Butz v. … Campbell v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 863 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.1988); Petrire v.

Phelps v. Szubinski

577 F. Supp. 2d 650 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 23, 2008

Morris-Hayes v. Board of Educ. of Chester Union Free Sch. Dist., 423 F.3d 153, 159 (2d Cir.2005) (citing Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 816 , 105 S.Ct. 2427 , 85 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985)). 1. … Leff Dep. 79:5-8, Oct. 30, 2006 ("Leff Dep.”)), and stated that pain management is a Board subcerti-fication of anesthesiology (Leff Dep. 79:9-14). 2 . Although Dr.

Choi's Beer Shop, LLC v. PNC Merchant Services Company, L.P.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 9, 2020

See Weixel v. Board of Educ., 287 F.3d 138, 145 (2d Cir. 2002). The class action complaint alleges the following facts. … See Shain v.

Persad v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 31, 2025

Blowe v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 19-CV-2658, 2020 WL 3129062, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. June 12, 2020); see also Brown, 708 F. … Batista v. Barnhart, 326 F. Supp. 2d 345, 353 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) (citing Brown v.

Samirah v. Sabhnani

772 F. Supp. 2d 437 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 25, 2011

See U.S. v. … See, e.g., In re Brown, 427 B.R. 715 (D.Minn.2010); Fed. Trade Comm’n v.

Hinfin Realty Corp. v. Pittston Co.

206 F.R.D. 350 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 12, 2002

Due to this uncertainty, the plaintiffs’ board members are unsure if the continuation of this action is economically warranted. … Kleid v.

In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation

603 F. Supp. 239 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 11, 1985

The adverse impact on military discipline and effectiveness were servicepersons allowed to sue the government, United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141, 143 , 99 L.Ed.2d 139 (1954); and *243 3. … United States, No. 82-859; Searcy v. United States, No. 82-1119; Jordan v. United States, No. 82-1264; Lambert v. United States, No. 82-1390; Kitaki v. United States, No. 82-1391; Jordan v.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Spartan Mechanical Corp.

738 F. Supp. 664 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 4, 1990

Board of Educ. v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, 71 N.Y.2d 21, 24 , 523 N.Y.S.2d 475, 476 , 517 N.E.2d 1360, 1361 (1987). … Id.; Board of Educ. v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, 71 N.Y.2d 21, 29 , 523 N.Y.S.2d 475, 479 , 517 N.E.2d 1360, 1365 (1987); Johnson Controls, Inc. v.

Abrams v. Société Nationale Des Chemins De Fer Français

175 F. Supp. 2d 423 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 5, 2001

Rather, its President and members of the governing board are appointed by the French government. See Haimo Decl. ¶ 3. Other members of the governing board are consumers and employees of SNCF. See id. … Its President and governing board are appointed by the French government. See id.