Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,793 results
1.14s
District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 16, 2026
See Wolf v. New Jersey, No.1:17-CV-1624 (CM), 2017 WL 11930764, at *1 n.1 (S.D.N.Y. … Blair & Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUlanov v. New York State Board of Elections
District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 19, 2022
Montero v. Travis, 171 F.3d 757, 760 (2d Cir. 1999) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327 (1989)). … Courts in this circuit have held that the New York State “Board of Elections is a state agency for the purposes of the Eleventh Amendment.” Credico v. New York State Bd. of Elections, 751 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUlanov v. New York State Board of Elections
District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 14, 2022
Nemaizer v. Baker, 793 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir. 1986); see also Ruotolo v. … See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962).
Cited 0 timesUnknownW.J.F. Realty Corp. v. Town of Southampton
220 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 4, 2002
Aubin v. … Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWebster v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
413 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 3, 1976
Waterford Board of Education, 473 F.2d 629 (2d Cir. 1973), it is clear that under even the least rigorous standard Congress may not “invidiously discriminate ... on the basis of criteria which bear no rational relation to … Most notably, in Polelle v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, 386 F.Supp. 443 (N.D.Ill. 1974) (three-judge court) and in Kohr v.
Reversed on other grounds by Califano v. Webster, 430 U.S. 313 (1977)Cited 2 timesPublished116 F. Supp. 3d 107 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 2015
Village, Defendants misconstrue Judge Brown’s findings and the ease law supporting Judge Bown’s. conclusion. Village Defendants contend that Judge Brown’s reliance on Anilao v. … Corp. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedSportique Motors, Ltd. v. Jaguar Cars, Inc.
195 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 2002
Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. … Hyman v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGoosby v. Town Bd. of Town of Hempstead, NY
981 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 20, 1997
See Brown v. Thomson, 462 U.S. 835, 842 , 103 S.Ct. 2690, 2695-96 , 77 L.Ed.2d 214 (1983); see also White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755, 764 , 93 S.Ct. 2332, 2338-39 , 37 L.Ed.2d 314 (1973). … In addition to the Fourth Circuit's decision in Hines , the Town Board cites Baird v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSavino v. Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry
District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 14, 2025
Upon a showing of prejudice or bad faith, Savino may be entitled to a penalty against the Joint Board. Zann Kwan v. … Vangas v. Montefiore Med. Ctr., 823 F.3d 174, 183 (2d Cir. 2016) (quoting Hubicki v. Amtrak Nat. Passenger R. Co., 808 F. Supp. 192, 196 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)); Polito v. Tri-Wire Eng’g Sol., Inc., 699 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCenteno v. The Board of Education of Hicksville, UFSD
District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 27, 2025
On November 2, 2023, the plaintiff commenced a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Board of Education of Hicksville, USFD (“Board”), Board members and trustees, and the superintendent of schools. Centeno v. … (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Murphy v. Rodriguez, No. 23-CV-6998, 2025 WL 623694, at *1 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKaynard v. Local 25, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
367 F. Supp. 1065 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 19, 1973
“In determining the objectives of Local 25, the Board is entitled to look to the totality of the union’s conduct, and it is not bound by the union’s signs or professed object in picketing. See NLRB v. … Local 182, Int’l Bro. of Teamsters, etc., 314 F.2d 53, 58 (2d Cir. 1963); Brown Transport v. NLRB, 334 F.2d 30, 38 (5th Cir. 1964).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWolpert v. First National Bank of East Islip
381 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 9, 1974
The board thereby elected will serve until the first Tuesday in March, 1975, the normal annual meeting date. 20 The board as presently constituted shall act as board for the Bank until the new election. … Andersen National Bank v. Luckett, 821 U.S. 233 , 248, 64 S.Ct. 599 , 88 L.Ed. 692 (1944) ; Brown v. United Community National Bank, 282 F.Supp. 781, 783 (D.D.C.1968) ; McKee & Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished90 F. 440 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 11, 1898
The Zouave also star-boarded. … The bend at Brown’s Point is sharp, and curves several points eastwardly.
Cited 1 timesPublishedA. J. & J. J. McCollum v. Pennsylvania R.
3 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 12, 1933
McCollum had a free-board of 3 to 4 feet forward, 2% feet aft, and 18 to 20 inches amidships. The Port Carbon had a freeboard of about 2 feet amidships. Both the Dorothy R. … The Delmar was unable to put a siphon on board the Dorothy R. McCollum, and the pumps of the Dorothy R. McCollum could not be used to free her of water.
Cited 2 timesPublished8 F. Cas. 744 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 7, 1873
S.) 748; Crapo v. Allen [Case No. 3,360]; Cutting v. Seabury [Id. 3,521]; The Admiralty Law of Collision, 158; The Sea Gull [Case No. 12.578]. … Smith v. Brown, 1 Asp. 59.
Cited 14 timesPublishedW.J.F. Realty Corp. v. Town of Southampton
351 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 2, 2004
P.56(c), brought by the Town of Southampton (“Town”), the Town Board of the Town of Southampton (“Board”), and the Southampton Planning Board (“Planning Board”), (collectively “Defendants”). *20 For the following reasons, … Wital Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished15 F. Supp. 3d 253 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 24, 2014
See Bickerstaff v. Vassar Coll., 196 F.3d 435, 452 (2d Cir.1999); Scotto v. Almenas, 143 F.3d 105, 114 (2d Cir.1998); Harlen Assoc. v. Inc. … Moreover, Brown testified that at the time Plaintiff slipped, Brown had just brought a cart of leftover packaging, e.g., boxes and plastic, through the nearby aisle numbered 37-38.
Cited 16 timesPublished682 F. Supp. 1287 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 14, 1988
This matter consists of three consolidated cases: Whitfield (formerly Brock) v. Tomasso, et al., CV 84-4280; Brown v. Tomasso, et al., CV 84-2634, and Benvenuto v. Schneider, et al., CV 85-1664. … United States v. Cunningham, CR 81-480-01 (J. Glasser, E.D.N.Y.).
Cited 30 timesPublished361 F. Supp. 1048 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 25, 1973
Board of Regents, 273 Cal.App.2d 430 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 260 (1969), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 396 U.S. 554 , 90 S.Ct. 754 , 24 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970) ; Clarke v. … See Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 361-362 , (1943).
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Flemings v. Chafee
330 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 19, 1971
See, e. g., Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103, 111 , 70 S.Ct. 495, 498-499 , 94 L.Ed. 691 (1950); McLaughry v. Deming, 186 U.S. 49 , 22 S.Ct. 786 , 46 L.Ed. 1049 (1902). … Brown, 1 N.J.Misc. 377, 378 (Sup.Ct. 1923) (There should be a strong reason presented to a court why * * * the indictment should be sent to another county for trial.”); Pa.Const. Art.
Cited 23 timesPublished
Ask Donna