Case law

Cherry v. Howell

4 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 31, 1931

S. 181; but a class action is not proper for fraud or deceit, Dykman v. Keeney, 154 N. Y. 483 , 48 N. E. 894 ; Marsh v. Kaye, 168 N. Y. 196 , 61 N. E. 177 ; Brown v. Werblin, 138 Misc. 29 , 244 N. Y. … Akely v. Kinnicutt, 238 N. Y. 466 , 144 N. E. 682 ; Brown v. Kinnicutt (D. C.) 2 F.(2d) 263 ; Spetler v. Jogel Realty Co., Inc., 224 App. Div. 612 , 231 N. Y. S. 517.

Kantrowitz v. Uniondale Union Free School District

822 F. Supp. 2d 196 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2011

For example, Paul Brown (“Brown”), a fifty-seven year old African American man, was appointed to the position of Director of Physical Education, Athletics, and Health in May 2003, and was given a probationary term of July … Brown subsequently was granted tenure in this position effective June 30, 2007. (Id. ¶ 111.)

Krawez v. Stans

306 F. Supp. 1230 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 3, 1969

A Special Board of Officers consisting of faculty members was convened on October 20. Present at all nonexecutive Board sessions were two junior faculty members who served as “counsel” to the plaintiffs. … See Brown v. United States, 396 F.2d 989, 993-94 , 184 Ct.Cl. 501 (1968). Such a hearing may be especially desirable where there is a question as to the sufficiency of the hearing below. See Jordan v.

In re Astell Engineering & Iron Works, Inc.

278 F. 743 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 12, 1921

A special meeting of the board of directors of the bankrupt was held January 19, 1921, at which were present Richard S. Groves, George Brown, and James S. Regan. … In Rochester Savings Bank v.

Beverley v. 1115 Health & Benefits Fund

420 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 12, 2005

While Plaintiff contends that Brown & Brown was originally engaged to address problems with another employee, (PI. 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 60), it is undisputed that Brown & Brown met with both Beverley and Hamilton and provided sensitivity … Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 339 (2d Cir.1999) (citing Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 7 F.3d 1085 , 1087 (2d Cir.1993) (per cu-riam)); see also General Building Contractors Ass’n. Inc. v.

The Esrom

261 F. 624 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 13, 1919

I think a correct statement of the law is to *626 be found in the opinion in the case of Blowers v. One Wire Rope Cable (D. … on board, and not from the time only when the ship breaks ground.

New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey

466 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 14, 1978

See Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 299-300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1954). … See Doe v. New York University, 442 F.Supp. 522 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Crawford v. University of North Carolina, 440 F.Supp. 1047 (M.D.N.C.1977). In Kampmeier v.

Roosevelt Field, Inc. v. Town of North Hempstead

88 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 11, 1950

The New York cases of Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Maltbie, 296 N.Y. 374 , 73 N.E.2d 705 ; Baddour v. City of Long Beach, 279 N.Y. 167 , 18 N.E.2d 18 , 124 A.L.R. 1003 ; Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. … Thatcher, 278 N.Y. 222 , 15 N.E.2d 587 , 117 A.L.R. 110 , and Brous v.

United States v. Gomez-Londono

422 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 17, 1976

The informant described Gomez-Londono as a man born October 12, 1950, and having brown hair, brown eyes, thick lips, broad nose, a square hairline, and a Colombian passport, No. 53 5124. … Hampton v.

Blassingame v. Secretary of the Navy

678 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 28, 1988

Blassingame v. Secretary of the Navy, 811 F.2d 65, 74 (2d Cir.1987). … The Second Circuit recently held that the reasoning of Wilson v.

C. W. Crane & Co. v. Charles Dreifus & Co.

26 F. Supp. 5 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 23, 1939

The facts are not unlike those in Dailey et al. v. Carroll et al., 2 Cir., 248 F. 466 . … Trucking Corporation v. City of New York, 2 Cir., 18 F.2d 775 ; and Hastorf v. Hudson River Stone Sup *7 ply Co. et al., D.C., 110 F. 669 ; Schoonmaker v. City of New York, 2 Cir., 167 F. 975 .

Catapano v. Western Airlines, Inc.

105 F.R.D. 621 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 23, 1985

During discovery, plaintiffs deposed Lorraine Brown. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(d); Washington v. New York City Board of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792, 797 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983); Lanza v.

Cupo v. Community National Bank & Trust Co.

324 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 1, 1971

Gamble v. Brown, 29 F.2d 366, 372-373 (4th Cir. 1928), cert. denied, 279 U.S. 839 , 49 S.Ct. 253 , 73 L.Ed. 986 (1929). … Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 329 , 64 S.Ct. 587, 592 , 88 L.Ed. 754 (1944). See also Electronic Spec. Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937 , 947-948 (2d Cir. 1969); Dabney v. Chase Nat.

LaBarbera v. C. Volante Corp.

164 F. Supp. 2d 321 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 26, 2001

In Brown v. C. … For the reasons stated in Brown , all three arguments lack merit. Further, as in the period addressed in Brown , Volante indicated its intent to be bound by the CBAs between October 1, 1993 and June 30, 1997.

Gesualdi v. Reid

198 F. Supp. 3d 211 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 29, 2016

Brown for a recommendation as to whether it should be granted, and if so, the relief to be awarded. … In Gesualdi v.

Huntington Branch, National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Town of Huntington

668 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 9, 1987

Two useful vade mecums are Brown v. Artery Organization, Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106 (D.D.C.1987) (Greene, J.), and Keith v. Volpe, 618 F.Supp. 1132 (C.D.Cal.1985) (Pregerson, Cir. J., sitting by designation). … Brown, supra, 654 F.Supp. at 1114 .

Blassingame v. Secretary of the Navy

626 F. Supp. 632 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 14, 1985

To decide otherwise “would permit a plaintiff to have the power to avoid the jurisdictional bar every time he submitted an application which was considered by the Board.” Pacyna v. … V at 4.) 2 . Under 10 U.S.C. § 1553 a former member of the armed services can petition a discharge review board at any time within 15 years of the date of discharge or dismissal. 3 .

In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation

689 F. Supp. 1250 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 5, 1988

Lombardi v. … Adams v.

Malley v. Hupper

31 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 31, 1940

In Warner v. … Hough v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., 100 U.S. 213 [ 25 L.Ed. 612 ]; Wilson v. Merry, L.R. 1 Sc. & Div.App. 326; Allen v. New Gas Co., 1 Exch.Div. 251; Malone v. Hathaway, 64-N.Y. 5, 9 [ 21 Am.Rep. 573 ]; Fuller v.

Wrynn v. United States

200 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 20, 1961

Ramsey v. New York Central R. R., 1935, 269 N.Y. 219, 224 , 199 N.E. 65 , 102 A.L.R. 511 ; Lawless v. Board of Education, 3d Dept. 1958, 6 A.D.2d 655, 657 , 180 N.Y.S.2d 220 ; Naitove & Co. v. … United States v. Alexander, 4 Cir.1956, 234 F.2d 861, 865 ; Sanchez v. United States, 10th Cir.1949, 177 F.2d 452 ; Ford v. Grand Union Company, 1935, 268 N.Y. 243, 246, 253 , 197 N.E. 266 ; Burmaster v.