Case law

Ray M. Ex Rel. Juana D. v. Board of Education

884 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 24, 1995

Louis M. by Velma M. v. Ambach, 113 F.R.D. 133, 136 (N.D.N.Y.1986) (emphasis in the original). See also Andre II. by Lula H. v. … See Eisen v.

Veloz-Gertrudis v. United States

768 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 3, 1991

See United States v. Shearer, 473 U.S. at 58 , 105 S.Ct. at 3043 . This is clearly barred by Feres. See, e.g., id.; Bozeman v. United States, 780 F.2d at 202 ; Brown v. United States, 739 F.2d 362, 369 (8th Cir.1984). … Brown v. United States, 739 F.2d at 367-69 . The distinction was approved in Durant v. Neneman, 884 F.2d 1350 (10th Cir.1989), a case relied on by plaintiffs.

Rosenthal v. Board of Ed. of Central HS Dist. No. 3

385 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 24, 1975

It recognized that the one man, one vote rule does not apply to an appointive board, Sailors v. … Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 , 18 L.Ed.2d 650 (1967); cf. Fortson v. Morris, 385 U.S. 231 , 87 S.Ct. 446 , 17 L.Ed.2d 330 (1966). See also People ex rel. Younger v.

Medford v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n, Inc.

290 F. Supp. 3d 174 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 5, 2017

Brown, Ms. Healey, and Mr. … See, e.g. , Meredith v. La.

Brown v. City of New York

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 25, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHELBIA BROWN, … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104–105 (1976)); see Harris v.

Brown v. South Shore University Hospital

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 10, 2025

V. … 15 The case upon which Brown relies, New York City Transit Authority v.

Arum v. Miller

304 F. Supp. 2d 344 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 8, 2003

Law § 50 — e; see also Brown v. Metropolitan Transport. Auth., 717 F.Supp. 257, 259 (S.D.N.Y.1989). … See Brown, 717 F.Supp. at 259 .

Ulrich v. Mane

383 F. Supp. 2d 405 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 25, 2005

Finally, I find the plaintiffs’ suggestion that Ognibene’s situation is somehow analogous to that of the plaintiffs in Brown v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974).

Van-Go Transport Co. v. New York City Board of Education

53 F. Supp. 2d 278 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 19, 1999

Mem. of Law, pp. 21-23, 28 (citing Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Int’l Union, 468 U.S. 491 , 104 S.Ct. 3179 , 82 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); Belknap, Inc. v. … While there may be some dicta in the Brown case that seems to suggest that the “local interests” and “peripheral concerns” exceptions do not apply in a Machinists type situation, see Brown, 468 U.S. at 503 , 104 S.Ct. at

Finkle v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF SYOSSET CENT. SCHOOL

386 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 12, 2005

Board of Educ. of Monticello Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Commr. of Educ., 91 N.Y.2d 133, 139-40 , 667 N.Y.S.2d 671 , 690 N.E.2d 480 (N.Y.1997). … . § 1983 against a school board or its members in their official capacities." Seils v.

Herold v. Braun

671 F. Supp. 936 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 15, 1987

Kohn v. Royall, Koegel & Wells, 59 F.R.D. 515, 525 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (citing Brown v. … See Kraus v. Board of County Road Comm’rs, 364 F.2d 919 , 922 (6th Cir.1966). For these reasons, and in light of the federal policy against piecemeal appeals, see Union Tank Car Co. v.

T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Town of Islip

893 F. Supp. 2d 338 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 21, 2012

Rather, MacDonald stated, because the pole was brown, “in the winter you may see more of a brown pole”. (R. at 526.) … T-Mobile’s architect did not deny that there would be increased visibility in the winter, but rather stated that, because the tower would be painted brown, “in the winter you may see more of a brown pole”. (R. at 526.)

United States v. Mitchell

352 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 30, 1972

But, as the Court pointed out in Bell, United States v. Epperson, 4th Cir. 1972, 454 F.2d 769 , sustained a search based upon magnetometer activation alone. The Court there used the analysis of Terry v. … The Court in deciding Bell did not refer to Adams v.

United States v. Riggs

347 F. Supp. 1098 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 8, 1972

In Terry v. … In Adams v.

John A. Brown

75 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 18, 1948

Upon the facts in this case, it is my opinion that, within the reasoning of Lind et al. v. … Helpful discussions are found in two cases cited for the Brown: The Gulfstar, 3 Cir., 136 F.2d 461 , and City of New York v. American Export Lines, Inc., 2 Cir., 131 F.2d 902 . This charge falls with the prior ones. V.

A.A. v. Board of Education, Central Islip Union Free School District

255 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 7, 2003

See Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 188-89 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982); M.C. v. Voluntown Bd. of Educ., 226 F.3d 60, 62 (2d Cir.2000). 6. … Board of Educ., 288 F.3d 478 , 483 n. 5 (2d Cir.2002). Likewise, rights alleged pursuant to Section 504 may also be pursued by way of a Section 1983 cause of action. Weixel v.

D.M. v. Board of Education, Center Moriches Union Free School District

296 F. Supp. 2d 400 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 17, 2003

Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 181-82 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … J.C. v. Regional Sch. Dist. 10, Bd. of Educ., 278 F.3d at 124-25. This requirement was made clear by the decision of the Supreme Court in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

Palmer v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE & NORWEGIAN SPIRIT

741 F. Supp. 2d 405 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 2, 2010

Although a stranger to the plaintiff, Brown made travel arrangements for everyone in the group. Then, Brown or another member of the group — not the plaintiff — held the group’s tickets before and after embarkation. … Lousararian v.

BOARD OF ED., EAST MEADOW UNION FREE SCH. v. Bell

530 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 14, 1982

530 F.Supp. 1130 (1982) BOARD OF EDUCATION, EAST MEADOW UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT and Board of Education, Rome City School District and Michael Turner, Martin A. … County School Board, Prince George County, Virginia, 221 F.Supp. 93 (E.D.Va.1963); United States v. Bossier Parish School Board, 220 F.Supp. 243 (W.D.La.1963), aff'd, 336 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1964).

New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Riverhead Town Board

118 F. Supp. 2d 333 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 24, 2000

See WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning Board of the Town of Lloyd, 79 N.Y.2d 373, 381 , 583 N.Y.S.2d 170, 173 , 592 N.E.2d 778 (1992); 6 NYCRR § 617.2(b)(1); East Coast Development Co. v. … See 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c)(7)(B)(v). Verizon relies heavily on Lucas v.