Case law

Vecchia v. Town of North Hempstead

927 F. Supp. 579 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 21, 1996

Webb [v. Board of Education of Dyer County, Tennessee] supra [ 471 U.S. 234 ] at 243, 105 S.Ct. [1923], At 1928-1929 [ 85 L.Ed.2d 233 ] [ (1985) ]; see also Hensley v. … In Webb v.

Anastasiou v. M/T WORLD TRUST

338 F. Supp. 2d 406 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 1, 2004

Anastasiou Dep. at 7, 18 (Plaintiff is an employee of Maritech 6 and Plaintiffs injury occurred on board the Vessel which was anchored in the New York City harbor); see generally Marinelli v. … Ltd. v.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kaplan

397 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 2, 1975

Powell, supra; Federal Trade Commission v. Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292 , 435 F.2d 96, 102 (1970). … Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Trussell Mfg. Co. v. S. E. & M. Vernon, Inc.

11 F.2d 289 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 11, 1926

Van Epps v. United Box Board & Paper Co. (C. C.) 137 F. 418 at page 419. This limitation was rendered necessary by the prior art, but it would still bind the plaintiff, if it was voluntary on the part of the patentee. … Royer v. Coupe, 13 S. Ct. 166 , 146 U. S. 524, 532 , 36 L. Ed. 1073 ; Merrill v. Yeomans, 94 U. S. 568 , 24 L. Ed. 235 ; Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co. (C. C. A.) 263 F. 578, 582 .

Nielson v. United States

112 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 15, 1953

said vessel, or any other licensed pilot goes on board said vessel, it is understood and agreed that said tugboat captain or licensed pilot becomes the servant of the owners of the vessel assisted in respect to the giving … See also: Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., v. Navigazione Libera Triestina S. A., 2 Cir., 92 F.2d 37 , certiorari denied 302 U.S. 744 , 58 S.Ct. 145 , 82 L.Ed. 575 ; Sun Oil Co. v.

Barrett v. Suffolk Transportation Services, Inc.

600 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 7, 1984

Brennan v. Ace Hardware Corp., 495 F.2d 368, 374 (8th Cir.1974); see Marshall v. … See, e.g., U.S.E.E.O.C. v. County of Calumet, 686 F.2d 1249 (7th Cir.1982); Arritt v. Grisell, 567 F.2d 1267, 1270-71 (4th Cir.1977); EEOC v.

Falise v. American Tobacco Co.

107 F. Supp. 2d 200 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 2000

See also, e.g., Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999); Daubert v. Merrell Doiv Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). … Hilao v. Estate of Marcos, 103 F.3d 767 (9th Cir.1996) (statistical sample of class claims); David H. Kaye & David A.

Hernandez v. Costa Armatori, S.P.A.

467 F. Supp. 1064 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 1979

Plaintiff, citing Czaplicki v. … See, e. g., Di Somma v. N. V. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot, 188 F.Supp. 292 (S.D.N.Y.1960).

United States v. Davis

319 F. Supp. 3d 608 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 22, 2018

Although the Second Circuit held otherwise in United States v. Brown , 52 F.3d 415 (2d Cir. 1995), Defendant argues that caselaw predating 2010 Johnson "is no longer good law." (Def. Letter 6.) … The Government contends that Brown remains binding authority, and has been reaffirmed post- 2010 Johnson by United States v. Miles , 748 F.3d 485 , 490 (2d Cir. 2014). (Gov. Letter 5-6.)

Gund, Inc. v. Smile International, Inc.

691 F. Supp. 642 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 22, 1988

The eyes, comprised of two colors, are largely obscured by the light brown fur. The nose has two indented nostrils. Defendant’s product (the Smile dog) is a somewhat different floppy plush dog. … Though both dogs have a brown fur, that of the Smile dog is darker and appears to be of uneven length on the toy. Muttsy has softer and finer fur, apparently of uniform length throughout.

Corbin v. Federal Deposit Insurance

74 F.R.D. 147 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 1977

In United States v. … Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 814 , 95 L.Ed. 1118 (1951); United States v. Chandler, supra."

Brisco v. Phillips

376 F. Supp. 2d 306 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 16, 2005

See Brown v. Payton, — U.S. -, *312 -, 125 S.Ct. 1432, 1438-39 , 161 L.Ed.2d 334 (2005); Taylor, 529 U.S. at 405 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 . … He was described as about 40 years old, with brown hair, 5'10" tall, and “pouchy.”

United States v. Persico

87 F.R.D. 156 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 12, 1980

Compare United States v. Brown, 456 F.2d 1112, 1114 (5th Cir. 1972) (a defendant in a federal prosecution “must be present at sentencing”) with Byrd v. … See also, e. g., People v. Stroman, 36 N.Y.2d 939 , 373 N.Y.S.2d 548 , 335 N.E.2d 853 (1975); Root v. Kapelman, 67 A.D.2d 131, 136 , 414 N.Y.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. International Foreign Currency, Inc.

334 F. Supp. 2d 305 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 2004

See Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n. v. … Were the Transactions Conducted on a “board of trade” Defendants argue that the Treasury Amendment, as interpreted by Dunn v.

Van-Go Transport Co., Inc. v. New York City Bd. of Educ.

971 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 30, 1997

Van-Go did appeal to the Board of Review, but no hearing was ever held. … H, Test, of Paul Dachs at Board of Review Hr’g November 9, 1994, at 5.

Stora

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 7, 2026

[of Elections] and the Board’s staff,” on an expedited schedule. … Moates v.

United States v. Gonzalez

364 F. Supp. 1176 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 11, 1973

In United States v. … United States v. Couming, 445 F.2d 555, 557 (1st Cir. 1971); United States v. Jacques, 463 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1972); United States v. Figurell, 462 F.2d 1080 (3d Cir. 1972); United States v.

Navigazione Generale Italiana v. L. Hirshberg & Co.

43 F.2d 248 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 16, 1930

Two boards are separated by a space of 8 inches, being held in place by connecting pieces. … C. 417, and Cuneo Bros. v. S. S. Hog Island (U. S. D. Ct. March 14,1930) 43 F.(2d) 243 ,1930 A. M. C. 703.

Long Island Rail Road v. System Federation No. 156

289 F. Supp. 119 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 16, 1968

board as provided by 45 U.S.C.A. … It need not be decided which board is appropriate or whether this dispute is major or minor in nature. Rutland Railway Corp. v. Brotherhood etc., 307 F.2d at 33 .

Elbee Chocolate Co. v. United States

58 F.2d 661 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 6, 1932

In Caughey-Jossman Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 8 B. T. … The Board of Tax Appeals in the petition of Levine Bros., Inc., v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue had no jurisdiction over the plaintiff.