Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

4,748 results

0.89s

  • Grijalva v. Coward

    District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 9, 2024

    In Forma Pauperis Upon review of the IFP motion, the Court finds that Grijavla is qualified by his financial status to commence this action without the prepayment of … “Section 1983 itself creates no substantive rights; it provides only a procedure for redress for the deprivation of rights established elsewhere.” Sykes v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brady v. Top Ships Inc.

    324 F. Supp. 3d 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 20, 2018

    .) *343 The two remaining movant groups, Top Ships Investor Group and Nardiello and Wang, each twice reiterated their positions established in their initial motion papers: on November 6, 2017, both groups filed memoranda … Both of these figures clearly weigh in favor of appointing the Top Ships Investor Group.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Arungwa

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 10, 2026

    Third, Plaintiff’s bare allegation that he was sick does not establish his entitlement to FMLA leave. See Compl. at 5. … he fell sick in May 2022, id., the Court draws the reasonable inference that Plaintiff was so qualified, see Philippe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • London v. Nassau County District Attorney's Office

    District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 28, 2020

    immunity. … It is well-established that prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity from liability in suits seeking monetary damages for acts related to prosecutorial duties. See Burns v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Braithwaite v. State of New York

    District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 2023

    It is well-established that judges “generally have absolute immunity” from suit for judicial acts performed in their judicial capacities. Bliven v. … Section 1983 Claims Against DA Sini, DA Tierney, ADA Kubetz, ADA Powers, and ADA Wagner It is well-established that prosecutors are absolutely immune from civil suits

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Braithwaite v. Kubetz

    District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 2023

    It is well-established that judges “generally have absolute immunity” from suit for judicial acts performed in their judicial capacities. Bliven v. … Section 1983 Claims Against DA Sini, DA Tierney, ADA Kubetz, ADA Powers, and ADA Wagner It is well-established that prosecutors are absolutely immune from civil suits

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Seizure of All Funds in Names Registry Pub.

    887 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 30, 1995

    The defendant property, however, itself is immune from suppression and remains subject to forfeiture. Daccarett, 6 F.3d at 46 ; $37,780 in U.S. Currency, 920 F.2d at 163 . … In the Court's view, the registries and accompanying services offered by the Company clearly establish that there are real, viable business networking opportunities incident to membership in the Company's registries.

    Vacated on other grounds by Gordon v. United States, 68 F.3d 577 (1995)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coser v. Moore

    587 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 3, 1983

    Except for the qualified ranks, the academic categories are linked for purposes of salary and promotion. … The president appoints those faculty, who “... are, in his judgment, best qualified.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Subirats v. D'ANGELO

    938 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 1996

    Applying these standards, the Court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to establish a Section 1983 claim for malicious prosecution. … Having granted the defendants’ motion based on the plaintiffs failure to establish a cause of action, the Court need not consider the other arguments raised by the defendants in the motion papers such as qualified immunity

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Weil v. Long Island Savings Bank

    195 F. Supp. 2d 383 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 22, 2001

    A finding that the regulation establishes a privilege does not, however, end the analysis in this case. … . § 563.180 (d)(12) is not qualified. Further, the privilege is not subject to waiver by the financial institution.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Soley v. County of Nassau

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 26, 2022

    Simon, 727 F.3d at 172; Warney, 587 F.3d at 121 (“[T]o establish immunity, the ultimate question is whether the prosecutor[] ha[s] carried [her] burden of establishing that [she was] functioning as [an] advocate[] when … Brady material[] is clearly protected by the doctrine of absolute immunity.” (collecting cases)). Ms. Rosenbaum’s claimed suppression of Brady material is therefore absolutely immune from suit. 5.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLC

    268 F. Supp. 3d 381 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 1, 2017

    Consequently, while the home is not itself a place of public accommodation, entities that provide services in the home may qualify as place of public accommodation. … The use of the word, “provider” clearly covers.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • In Re Rasmussen

    456 B.R. 1 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 14, 2011

    The Bank *2 ruptcy Court reasoned that Debtors’ remainder interest in the Premises qualified for the exemption because New York’s homestead exemption statute, New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 5206 (“Section 5206 … As to the first, the Trustee points to nothing suggesting that Section 5206’s drafters “clearly and unequivocally” intended to exclude remaindermen from claiming a homestead exemption.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Braithwaite v. State of New York

    District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 2023

    It is well-established that judges “generally have absolute immunity” from suit for judicial acts performed in their judicial capacities. Bliven v. … Section 1983 Claims Against DA Sini, DA Tierney, ADA Kubetz, ADA Powers, and ADA Wagner It is well-established that prosecutors are absolutely immune from civil suits

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harrison v. Ricks

    326 F. Supp. 2d 372 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 21, 2004

    In addition, counsel noted that 31 percent of the qualified jurors (8 of 26 jurors remaining after jurors were excused for cause) at the end of round two were African-American. … Thus, counsel argued, the 80 percent challenge rate and 67 percent exclusion rate of African-American jurors as compared to the 31 percent African-American pool of qualified jurors established a pattern sufficient to give

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dawson v. The City of New York

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 3, 2023

    This is because “an absolute immunity defeats a suit at the outset, so long as the official’s actions were within the scope of the immunity.” Imbler v. … in the alleged act of presenting false evidence); Hill, 45 F.3d at 661 (“[C]onspiring to present falsified evidence to, and to withhold exculpatory evidence from, a grand jury . . . are clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Morrissey v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.

    910 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 11, 1996

    Moreover, the parties have not contested whether Morrissey was qualified for her job. Rather, the parties focus on the fourth element of the prima facie case. … In response to these clearly fair and beneficial maternity and medical leave policies, the plaintiff makes several arguments.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bartholomew v. Mount Sinai West

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 26, 2025

    Feb. 22, 2024) (finding the requested accommodations would have “clearly caused [d]efendant undue hardship”) (quoting We The Patriots I, 17 F4th at 292); see Groff v. … To establish discrimination under the ADA, a plaintiff must show that: “(1) the employer is subject to the ADA, (2) the employee is disabled or is perceived to be disabled as defined by the ADA, (3) the employee is qualified

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cuevas v. Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

    283 F.R.D. 95 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 22, 2012

    In light of the clearly established company-wide policies defining the primary job duties of all ABMs, along with the blanket exemption policy, “there is no evidence that [differences among class members] are of such a magnitude … Thus, plaintiff has established that proposed class counsel are “qualified, experienced and generally able to conduct the litigation.” In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 960 F.2d 285 , 290 (2d Cir.1992).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gause v. Claude

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 4, 2021

    In Forma Pauperis Applications2 Upon review of plaintiff’s declarations in support of her applications to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court finds that plaintiff is qualified to … Should plaintiff elect to file an amended complaint, it shall be clearly labeled “amended complaint” and shall bear the same docket number as this order, 20-CV-4148(JMA)(SIL).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.