Case law

Douds v. New York Local Union 10, International Brotherhood of Production, Maintenance & Operating Employees

120 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 15, 1954

Douds, Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board for the Second Region, hereinafter called the Board, filed a petition herein against the above-named respondent, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10(1) of … See National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Const. Trades Council, 341 U.S. 675 , 685 et seq., 71 S.Ct. 943 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 .

Town of North Hempstead v. Village of North Hills

80 F.R.D. 714 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 19, 1978

Clark v. Sandusky, 205 F.2d 915, 918 (7 Cir. 1953). … Hence here, as in New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v.

Clarke S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line

59 F.2d 423 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 18, 1932

A.) 55 F. 666 ; Sanford & Brooks Co. v. Columbia Dredging Co. (C. C. A.) 177 F. 878 ; Frank Waterhouse v. Rock Island Alaska Min. Co. (C. C. A.) 97 F. 466 ; Wencke v. Vaughan (C. C. A.) 60 F. 448 . … Co. v. Silverstein (C. C. A.) 53 F.(2d) 986 ; American & British Mfg. Corp. v. New Idria Q. Min. Co. (C. C. A.) 293 F. 509 .

Mandaglio v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners

575 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 23, 1983

Upon the charges sustained by the General Executive Board, the trial committee found as herein related. … There has been no showing that either plaintiff was denied the opportunity to confront, cross-examine, or explain the evidence submitted upon the charges sustained on appeal to the General Executive Board. See Ritz v.

Manera v. United States

124 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 1954

It is believed that the foregoing is a correct statement in view of all that was written in Pope & Talbot v. Hawn, 346 U.S. 406 , 74 S.Ct. 202 . … The decision in Hardie v. New York etc. Co., 2 Cir., 9 F.2d 545 , is thought to embody the rule which is applicable to the facts here involved.

In Re Agent Orange, Product Liability Litigation

506 F. Supp. 757 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 14, 1980

Brown, Hoberg, Finger, Brown, Cox & Molliga, San Francisco, Cal., Leslie Hulnick, Wichita, Kan., Sidney W. Gilreath, Knoxville, Tenn., Stephen J. Cavanaugh, Bellaire, Tex., Robert P. … Dow 6/12/80 WD NY CV 80-1865 Brown v. Dow 7/7/80 MD La CV 80-1866 Millis v. Dow 7/7/80 ED Tenn CV 80-1867 Paterson v. Dow 7/7/80 D Colo CV 80-1989 Lombardi v. Dow 7/21/80 D Md CV 80-1990 Villella v.

Rocha v. Bakhter Afghan Halal Kababs, Inc.

44 F. Supp. 3d 337 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 15, 2014

authorizes the wage board to make a recommendation regarding overtime. … In addition to making recommendations regarding minimum wages, the wage board may recommend such regulations as it deems appropriate with respect to, inter alia, overtime rates. Ballard v. Cmty.

Cooper v. TWA AIRLINES, LLC

274 F. Supp. 2d 231 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 30, 2003

Cooper, as a Board member, voted to approve. … Parker v.

Evergreen Review, Inc. v. Cahn

230 F. Supp. 498 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 11, 1964

Kingsley Books v. … Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187, 1963, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 ; Monroe v.

In Re Luxottica Group S.P.A., Securities Litigation

293 F. Supp. 2d 224 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 26, 2003

Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d at 943-44 . See Kramer v. Time Warner, Inc., 937 F.2d 767, 778-79 (2d Cir.1991). In Gerber v. … Galef v.

Newell v. Troy

343 F. Supp. 1253 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 8, 1972

In Powell v. … The only eases cited by plaintiffs, i. e., United States v. Manning, 215 F.Supp. 277 (W.D.La.1963), and United States v.

Greene v. Pyatt

78 F.R.D. 362 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 1978

In March, 1977, plaintiff was served by mail with defendant Board of Education’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s *363 claims. … See also, Schwarz v. United States, 384 F.2d 833, 835 (2d Cir. 1967). As noted by the District Court in Canup v.

Berger

District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 14, 2026

New York law forbids Appeals Board findings from “preclud[ing] the litigation of any issue of fact or law in any subsequent action.” N.Y. Lab. Law § 623; Pollard v. N.Y. … Brown v. S. Shore Univ. Hosp., 762 F.

Herron v. Koch

523 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 8, 1981

Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 548 , 89 S.Ct. 817, 822 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969); South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, 308 , 86 S.Ct. 803, 808 , 15 L.Ed.2d 769 (1966). … United States v. Board of Supervisors of Warren County, Mississippi, 429 U.S. 642, 645-47 , 97 S.Ct. 833, 834-35 , 51 L.Ed.2d 106 *173 (1977); Perkins v.

United States v. Lopez

328 F. Supp. 1077 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 14, 1971

In sum, almost everyone (99.86%) of the one-half million persons passed swiftly through the boarding process without even being asked a question and 99.95% boarded without being searched. … Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966) (discrimination against poor voters); Yick Wo v.

Fricke v. Daylin, Inc.

66 F.R.D. 90 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 13, 1975

The First Circuit in Greenspun v. … Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295, 306-307 , 60 S.Ct. 238 , 84 L.Ed. 281 (1939); Gottlieb v. McKee, 34 Del.Ch. 537 , 107 A.2d 240, 243 (Ct. of Chancery 1954); Stanton v.

Rosado v. Shalala

868 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 17, 1994

See Coria v. … Rodriguez v. Califano, 431 F.Supp. 421, 423 (S.D.N.Y. 1977).

Potter's Photographic Applications Co. v. Ealing Corporation

292 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 11, 1968

The “contract” between Ealing and the Board of Education was actually an approval by the Board of certain Ealing film loops for use in New York City public schools. … An Ealing representative made two brief trips to Board of Education offices in Brooklyn, New York, in order to learn how to accomplish the requisite paper work to gain Board approval.

Arno v. Costa Line, Inc.

589 F. Supp. 1576 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 7, 1984

boarding pass, although it is sued in this action as “Costa Line, Inc. d/b/a Costa Cruise.” … Plaintiff urges that the statement in her boarding pass regarding the identity of the carrier should be disregarded based on Silvestri v.

Miranda v. Bennet

352 F. Supp. 2d 381 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 19, 2005

Poindexter v. Nash, 333 F.3d 372, 379 (2d Cir.2003); Forbes v. … People v. Rosen, 96 N.Y.2d 329, 335 , 728 N.Y.S.2d 407, 410 , 752 N.E.2d 844 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 899 , 122 S.Ct. 224 , 151 L.Ed.2d 160 (2001). My colleague Judge Gleeson has reached a contrary view. See Brown v.