Case law

Birdsong v. Nurture, Inc.

275 F. Supp. 3d 384 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2017

The Court declines Birdsong’s invitation to follow the decisions in Jones v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 912 F.Supp.2d 889 (N.D.C.A. 2012) and Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., No. 11-CV-3082 (LB), 2012 WL 3138013 (N.D.C.A. … See Brown, 2012 WL 3138013 , at *8-9.

United States Ex Rel. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

97 F. Supp. 592 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 11, 1951

Volpe v. Smith, 289 U.S. 422 , 53 S.Ct. 665 , 77 L.Ed. 1298 ; United States ex rel. Roovers v. Kessler, 5 Cir., 90 F.2d 327 ; McCandless v. United States ex rel. Pantoja, 3 Cir., 44 F.2d 786 ; United States ex rel. … Siegel v. Reimer, D.C., 23 F.Supp. 643 . In Lewis v.

Romano v. Harrington

664 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1987

See State Board for Community Colleges and Occupational Education v. … Thus, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972), and Board of Regents v.

Mamakos v. Huntington Hospital

653 F. Supp. 1447 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 19, 1987

The board of directors did so on May 14, 1985. … “[T]he required nexus with interstate commerce,” Seglin v.

MetroPCS New York, LLC v. Village of East Hills

764 F. Supp. 2d 441 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 20, 2011

the Board on the negative visual impact of the cell sites.” … See, e.g., SMSA v. Oyster Bay Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 2010 WL 3937277 at *4 n. 2. V.

Verbeek v. Teller

114 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2000

Birmingham v. Ogden, 70 F.Supp.2d 353, 372 (S.D.N.Y.1999). … See Birmingham, 70 F.Supp.2d at 372-73 ; Camacho v. Brandon, 56 F.Supp.2d 370, 380 (S.D.N.Y.1999); Luc-chese v. Carboni, 22 F.Supp.2d 256, 258 (S.D.N.Y.1998).

InrRe Otto Freund Arnold Yeast Co.

178 F. 305 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 18, 1910

The case of New Jersey v. Anderson, 203 U. S. 483 , 27 Sup. Ct. 137, 51 L. … But we do not think the finding of tbe state board is conclusive. The tax is to be assessed upon capital actually outstanding. It may well be doubted whether the board had power to tax any other stock.

In Re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation

498 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 1980

Three J Farms, Inc. v. Alton Box Board Co., 1979-1 Trade Cas. … In State v.

The Nevada

18 F. Cas. 16 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 15, 1874

But see Gillespie v. Zittlosen [ 60 N. Y. 449 ], in which the contrary has since been decided. … Cisco v. Robert, 36 N. Y. 292 . My conclusion, therefore, is, that the libellant is entitled to recover the amount of his demand.

Felson v. Miller

674 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 23, 1987

The board appointed defendant and another board member to negotiate with the purchasers. A compromise was eventually reached and was approved by the board. … See Baer v. Broder, 106 Misc.2d 929, 929-31, 934-35 , 436 N.Y.S.2d 693, 694-95, 696 (Sup.Ct.1981) (following Donald v.

McDevitt v. Suffolk County

District Court, E.D. New York · May 9, 2025

See Matusick v. Erie Cnty. Water Auth., 757 F.3d 31, 64 (2d Cir. 2014) (affirming district court’s discretion to apply across- the-board reduction); Piccolo v. Top Shelf Prods., Inc., 541 F. … Supp. 3d 256, 258 (E.D.N.Y. 2021) (applying 90% across-the-board reduction); Vega-Ruiz v.

Davi v. Victoria

69 F. 160 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 8, 1895

The immediate cause of the injury was the swinging of a sling of fruit against the end of a board which the libelant was at the time adjusting in the hold, whereby one of his fingers was cut off and serious injury was done … The doctrine of fellow servant does not apply in such a case (see Johnson v. Navigation Co., 132 N. Y. 576 , 30 N. E. 505 ), and the ship is liable for the injury caused by the negligence of the winehman.

Brenes v. City of New York

733 F. Supp. 2d 357 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 5, 2010

See Ricca v. Board of Education, 47 N.Y.2d 385 , 418 N.Y.S.2d 345 , 391 N.E.2d 1322 (1979); Mc-Manus v. Board of Educ., 87 N.Y.2d 183 , 638 N.Y.S.2d 411 , 661 N.E.2d 984 (1995). … See Turano v. Board of Ed. of Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26, 411 F.Supp. 205, 210 (E.D.N.Y.1976); Emma v.

Brewster v. Secretary of United States Army

489 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 16, 1980

Military Records ("Army Correction Board"). … The 1978 action of the Army Correction Board changing the nature, but not the date, of plaintiff's 1956 discharge does not alter the time of accrual of the action. O'Callahan v. U.

United States v. Bell

335 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 24, 1971

Magnetometer Detection The magnetometer is an electronic weapons detector installed on the “jet-way,” i. e., boarding ramp near the boarding agent’s station. … Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 64 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

United States v. Perez

213 F. Supp. 2d 229 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 25, 2002

To exhaust administrative remedies, an alien is generally required to appeal from an Immigration Judge’s order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. United States v. … Johnson, 2000 WL 620324 , at *8 (D.Conn.2000), citing Mejia-Ruiz v. INS, 51 F.3d 358, 364 (2d Cir.1995). The defendant appealed the denial of the motion to reopen to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Long Island Rail Road Company v. United States

193 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 20, 1961

The Nickel Plate petitioned the Commission to suspend the quoted restriction ; the Commission’s Board of Suspension voted against this". … Against the Fifth Circuit decision in 'the Humble case, delivered over a strong dissent by Judge Brown, Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. F. P. C., 5 Cir., 1956, 236 F.2d 785 , 808-810, stand Atlantic Seaboard Corp. v. F. P.

Johnson v. City of New York

326 F. Supp. 2d 364 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 21, 2004

Introduction Pro se plaintiff Athea Linzey Johnson (“plaintiff’ or “Johnson”) filed an amended complaint against defendants New York City Board of Education (“Board”), New York City Department of Health (“DOH”), and several … ADA Coverage Neither the DOH nor the Board dispute that they are subject to the ADA. Therefore, the next inquiry is whether plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the statute. b.

Kirtley v. Joseph Abrams & Richland Securities, Inc.

184 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 27, 1960

Heike v. United States, 227 U.S. 131, 144 , 33 S.Ct. 226, 228 , 57 L.Ed. 450 . See also Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 ; Mason v. United States, 244 U.S. 362 , 37 S.Ct. 621 , 61 L.Ed. 1198 . … Rogers v. United States, 340 U.S. 367 , 71 S.Ct. 438 , 95 L.Ed. 344 ; Brown v. Walker, supra.

Town of North Hempstead v. Village of North Hills

482 F. Supp. 900 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 6, 1979

In addition to the Village, defendants are the Mayor and Board of Trustees of North Hills, and the municipal agencies responsible for sewage treatment and drinking water supply in the Village. … Stream Pollution Control Board v. United States Steel, Inc., 62 F.R.D. 31, 34 (N.D.Ind.1974), aff’d, 512 F.2d 1036 (7 Cir. 1975).