Case law

Hughes v. City of New York

197 F. Supp. 3d 467 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 23, 2016

Of necessity, the Board must have the ability to communicate to CEI that its employee may no longer work at one of the Board’s school sites, and the reasons for the Board’s decision. … V.

MacPherson v. Town of Southampton

738 F. Supp. 2d 353 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 7, 2010

Defendants argue that Count V, which alleges a violation of Plaintiffs’ Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights based upon the Town and Town Board’s “deliberate! ] and intentional! … The Court finds, however, that, while somewhat repetitive of the allegations made in the Initial Action, Count V also alleges different civil rights violations stemming from the Town and Town Board’s failure to adequately

Cosenza v. United States

183 F.R.D. 72 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 30, 1997

Victor V. … Managers, Inc. v. IRC Holding Corp., 885 F.2d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir.1989) (quoting Browning Debenture Holders’ Comm. v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir.1977)); accord United States v.

Yassky v. Kings County Democratic County Committee

259 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 25, 2003

Lerman v. Board of Elections In Lerman v. … Mootness As the Supreme Court recently stated in Buckkannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

Martin v. Warner

419 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 1976

. § 5895 , furnished to a Selection Board convened under 10 U.S.C. § 5893 the name and record of the plaintiff as one who was eligible for consideration for promotion by the Board to the rank of Captain in the United States … D’Arco v. United States, 441 F.2d 1173, 1175 , 194 Ct.Cl. 811, 816 (1971); Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch (5 U.S.) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).

Meding v. Receptopharm, Inc.

462 F. Supp. 2d 348 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 13, 2006

See also Brown v. Webster, fn.1 supra (so-called interest claim was a “principal demand” rather than an “accessory demand”); Bailey Employment System, Inc. v. … Judge Trager noted that these authorities had distinguished an earlier Supreme Court case, Brown v.

Simpson v. United States

664 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 30, 1987

Monday [v. … In United *50 States v.

Strip Clean Floor Refinishing v. New York District Council No. 9 Brotherhood of Painters

333 F. Supp. 385 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 9, 1971

Robertson & Associates, Inc. v. … Reading Utah Construction with United States v.

Thorsen v. Sons of Norway

996 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 6, 2014

Under Winter , demand is not futile, and should be made upon the board, “unless the wrongdoers constitute a majority of the board.” Id. at 233. … In a suit involving a violation of a board’s oversight duties, such as alleged here, Delaware applies the Rales test. See Wood v. Baum, 953 A.2d 136, 140 (Del.2008).

Birdsong v. Nurture, Inc.

275 F. Supp. 3d 384 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2017

The Court declines Birdsong’s invitation to follow the decisions in Jones v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 912 F.Supp.2d 889 (N.D.C.A. 2012) and Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., No. 11-CV-3082 (LB), 2012 WL 3138013 (N.D.C.A. … See Brown, 2012 WL 3138013 , at *8-9.

Pierre v. JC PENNEY CO., INC.

340 F. Supp. 2d 308 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 3, 2004

Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329 , 339 (2d Cir.2000). 1. Nexus to the State Few cases in this circuit or elsewhere arise under the “equal benefit” clause of § 1981. Felton v. … Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc., 266 F.3d 851 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1017 , 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002) (requiring state action for purposes of equal benefit clause); Brown v.

In Re Realty Associates Securities Corporation

66 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 11, 1946

Interest ordinarily ceases upon the inception of the bankruptcy proceeding ( 11 U.S.C.A. § 103 , sub. a (1,5); Sexton v. Dreyfus, 219 U.S. 339 , 31 S.Ct. 256 , 55 L.Ed. 244 ; Brown v. … Board of Comm’rs of Shawnee County, Kansas, v. Hurley, 8 Cir., 169 F. 92 , 97 and cases cited; In re United Cigar Stores Co. of America, supra; Merrill v.

In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation

618 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 11, 1985

Two submissions, one by Ross V. Lonnie & Co. and one by R.F.M. … Australian board and Justice Mahon in the case of the New Zealand board.

Field Day, LLC v. County of Suffolk

799 F. Supp. 2d 186 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 28, 2011

Co. v. … One such example of this rare breed of cases is Cahn v. Town of Huntington, 29 N.Y.2d 451 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 672 , 278 N.E.2d 908 (1972). There, the Town Board, utilizing the Town Attorney, sued the Town Planning Board.

Welch v. Atlantic Gulf & West Indies S. S. Lines

101 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 23, 1951

So much was said in Guttmann v. Illinois Central R. … In reaching this decision I have well in mind the admonition of Judge Learned Hand in Bozant v. Bank of New York, 2 Cir., 156 F.2d 787 .

In re Brown

37 F. Supp. 526 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 1941

Brown, the other bankrupt named, testified that the answers to the questions written in the financial statement for the National City Bank were in Brown’s handwriting. … The trustee relies upon Morris Plan Industrial Bank of New York v. Lassman, 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 473 .

New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States

32 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 15, 1940

Gully v. … Bradley Lumber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 84 F.2d 97 : This case has already been referred to. United States v.

Gibbs v. T. Z. R. Amusement Corp.

14 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 1936

The circumstances áre quite at variance with those examined in the case of Radio Corporation of America v. Emerson (C.C. A.) 296 F. 51 , upon which the defendants rely. … and prevented until the play starts again on all boards, so that, for instance, if the winner is seated at board 7, a player on board 9 not only finds all lights in his annunciator extinguished as the result of the completion

New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation

560 F. Supp. 2d 186 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 7, 2008

Ltd. v. … July 18, 2006) (“ ‘A federal court, after all, ‘should not ... sit as a zoning board of appeals.’ ”) (quoting Vill. of Belle Terre v.

Best v. BWIA West Indies Airways Ltd.

581 F. Supp. 2d 359 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2008

See El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. … Egyptair Corp., 961 F.2d 26, 31 (2d Cir.1992); see also Kapar v. Kuwait Airways Corp., 845 F.2d 1100, 1103 (D.C.Cir.1988); Shirobokova v. CSA Czech Airlines, Inc., 376 F.Supp.2d 439, 442 (S.D.N.Y.2005); Stanford v.