Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,793 results
0.64s
Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. Williams
862 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 1994
These activities are said to be the result of Board policies, thereby rendering the Board answerable in damages to the Tenenbaums. … CWA did not need the approval of the Board’s employees to effect the removal, and the Board’s employees had no right to obstruct the removal.
Vacated on other grounds by Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581 (1999)Cited 19 timesPublished425 F. Supp. 151 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 13, 1977
The key language in that case is as follows, 538 F.2d at 494 (quoting Board of Regents v. … Compare Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566, 572 (8th Cir. 1972), with Fujishima v. Board of Education, 460 F.2d 1355 (7th Cir. 1972), and Hammond v. Powell, 462 F.2d 1053 (4th Cir. 1972).
Cited 13 timesPublished30 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 22, 1998
United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d at 193 -94 (citing Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 611 , 105 S.Ct. 2254 , 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985); Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 ; Fed. … United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d at 193 -94 (citing Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 611 , 105 S.Ct. 2254 , 85 L.Ed.2d 636 [1985]; Gagnon v. Scarpelli 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 ; Fed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBay Shore Union Free School District v. T. Ex Rel. R.
405 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 21, 2005
See Board of Educ. v. … See also, Board of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 01-CV-6845 (GBD), 2005 WL 22866 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited 3 timesPublished436 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 22, 1977
436 F.Supp. 335 (1977) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney General of the State of New York, and Robert P. … This does not foreclose the Board from proceeding with the present action. See United States v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCorbin v. Franklin National Bank (In Re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation)
2 B.R. 687 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 6, 1979
Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. Seideman, 267 F.Supp. 915, 918 (E.D.N.Y.1967); Larrimer v. Feeney, 411 Pa. 604 , 192 A.2d 351 (1963); Cf. Chase National Bank v. … Hageman v. Signal L.P.
Cited 15 timesPublished702 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 18, 1988
See Damino v. Board of Regents, 124 A.D.2d 271 , 508 N.Y.S.2d 618 (3rd Dep’t 1986). DISCUSSION The Supreme Court in United States v. … Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 96 , 101 S.Ct. 411, 415-16 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980). In Allen v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNelco Corp. v. Slater Electric Inc.
80 F.R.D. 411 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 28, 1978
International Business Machines Corp., supra at 532; Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, supra at 331-32; In re Brown Company Securities Litigation, supra at 385-86; See generally Duke Gardens Foundation, Inc. v. … Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, supra at 333; In re Brown Securities Litigation, supra at 385.
Cited 28 timesPublishedCASTANZA v. Town of Brookhaven
700 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 2010
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Bond v. Board of Educ. of the City of New York, No. 97 Civ. 1337, 1999 WL 151702 , at *2 (E.D.N.Y Mar. 17, 1999).
Cited 43 timesPublishedIn Re Overseas National Airways, Inc.
238 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 16, 1965
In every case where such notice of intended change has been given, or conferences are being held with reference thereto, or the services of the Mediation Board have been requested by either party, or said Board has proffered … Code), and cites as authority therefor the case of United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 , 80 S.Ct. 1347 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 1409 , and the case of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v.
Cited 24 timesPublished566 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1983
Bianco v. Board of Trustees of Local 816, 494 F.Supp. 206, 207 (E.D.N.Y.1980). The pertinent facts, so viewed, are as follows. … For example, *866 in Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345, 1352 (9th Cir.1981), plaintiff alleged that his football coach intentionally assaulted him.
Cited 14 timesPublished743 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 24, 1990
Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 599 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2259 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 487-88 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417-18 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963)). … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2262 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (citations omitted). Here written consent was not free of the taint of the deceptive entry.
Cited 14 timesPublishedFalise v. American Tobacco Co.
241 B.R. 63 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 10, 1999
See Asset Value Fund Limited Partnership v. … In Advani Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedBooye v. A Cargo of Dry Boards
42 F. 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 10, 1890
, having been kiln-dried, could not be put on board in such weather without damage. … Thiis v. Byers. 1 Q. B. Div. 244.
Cited 0 timesPublished158 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 21, 2001
The demotion was ratified by the Village Board of Trustees (the “Board”). . … Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 574 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); see also Vasbinder v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedIsbrandtsen Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n
256 F. Supp. 68 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 27, 1966
National Marine Engineers’ Beneficial Association v. National Labor Relations Board, 274 F.2d 167 (2d Cir. 1960). … Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947).
Cited 17 timesPublishedDi Silvestro v. United States Veterans Administration
151 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 27, 1957
The reconsideration (which was by a board completely different in personnel from the earlier one) resulted in a holding adverse to the plaintiff, the final paragraph of which reads: “It is the decision of the Board that the … See Ford v. United States, 5 Cir., 230 F.2d 533 .
Cited 5 timesPublished149 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 5, 2001
See Leesona Corp. v. … Brown, 659 F.Supp. 1008 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Leesona Corp., 522 F.Supp. 1304 ; Board of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. Dist. v. CNA Ins. Co., 113 F.R.D. 654 (S.D.N.Y.1987)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcLeod v. LOCAL 239, INTERNAT'L BRO. OF TEAMSTERS, ETC.
179 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 7, 1960
McLEOD, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. … It has been held that the requirement placed upon the Board is met by a showing that there is sufficient evidence to "demonstrate that there was a basis for the Board's finding". Douds v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKaynard v. Local 804, Delivery & Warehouse Employees, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
338 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 7, 1972
B. v. Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, etc., 300 F.2d 237 , 242 (2 Cir. 1962). … Workers, AFL-CIO v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna