Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

0.64s

  • Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. Williams

    862 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 1994

    These activities are said to be the result of Board policies, thereby rendering the Board answerable in damages to the Tenenbaums. … CWA did not need the approval of the Board’s employees to effect the removal, and the Board’s employees had no right to obstruct the removal.

    Vacated on other grounds by Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581 (1999)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Argo v. Hills

    425 F. Supp. 151 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 13, 1977

    The key language in that case is as follows, 538 F.2d at 494 (quoting Board of Regents v. … Compare Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566, 572 (8th Cir. 1972), with Fujishima v. Board of Education, 460 F.2d 1355 (7th Cir. 1972), and Hammond v. Powell, 462 F.2d 1053 (4th Cir. 1972).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sanchez

    30 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 22, 1998

    United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d at 193 -94 (citing Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 611 , 105 S.Ct. 2254 , 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985); Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 ; Fed. … United States v. Brown, 899 F.2d at 193 -94 (citing Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 611 , 105 S.Ct. 2254 , 85 L.Ed.2d 636 [1985]; Gagnon v. Scarpelli 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 ; Fed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bay Shore Union Free School District v. T. Ex Rel. R.

    405 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 21, 2005

    See Board of Educ. v. … See also, Board of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 01-CV-6845 (GBD), 2005 WL 22866 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • NLRB v. State of NY

    436 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 22, 1977

    436 F.Supp. 335 (1977) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney General of the State of New York, and Robert P. … This does not foreclose the Board from proceeding with the present action. See United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Corbin v. Franklin National Bank (In Re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation)

    2 B.R. 687 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 6, 1979

    Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. Seideman, 267 F.Supp. 915, 918 (E.D.N.Y.1967); Larrimer v. Feeney, 411 Pa. 604 , 192 A.2d 351 (1963); Cf. Chase National Bank v. … Hageman v. Signal L.P.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Damino v. Barrell

    702 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 18, 1988

    See Damino v. Board of Regents, 124 A.D.2d 271 , 508 N.Y.S.2d 618 (3rd Dep’t 1986). DISCUSSION The Supreme Court in United States v. … Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 96 , 101 S.Ct. 411, 415-16 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980). In Allen v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nelco Corp. v. Slater Electric Inc.

    80 F.R.D. 411 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 28, 1978

    International Business Machines Corp., supra at 532; Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, supra at 331-32; In re Brown Company Securities Litigation, supra at 385-86; See generally Duke Gardens Foundation, Inc. v. … Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett, supra at 333; In re Brown Securities Litigation, supra at 385.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • CASTANZA v. Town of Brookhaven

    700 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 2010

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Bond v. Board of Educ. of the City of New York, No. 97 Civ. 1337, 1999 WL 151702 , at *2 (E.D.N.Y Mar. 17, 1999).

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • In Re Overseas National Airways, Inc.

    238 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 16, 1965

    In every case where such notice of intended change has been given, or conferences are being held with reference thereto, or the services of the Mediation Board have been requested by either party, or said Board has proffered … Code), and cites as authority therefor the case of United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 , 80 S.Ct. 1347 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 1409 , and the case of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Ward

    566 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1983

    Bianco v. Board of Trustees of Local 816, 494 F.Supp. 206, 207 (E.D.N.Y.1980). The pertinent facts, so viewed, are as follows. … For example, *866 in Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345, 1352 (9th Cir.1981), plaintiff alleged that his football coach intentionally assaulted him.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Giraldo

    743 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 24, 1990

    Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 599 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2259 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 487-88 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417-18 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963)). … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2262 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (citations omitted). Here written consent was not free of the taint of the deceptive entry.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Falise v. American Tobacco Co.

    241 B.R. 63 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 10, 1999

    See Asset Value Fund Limited Partnership v. … In Advani Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Booye v. A Cargo of Dry Boards

    42 F. 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 10, 1890

    , having been kiln-dried, could not be put on board in such weather without damage. … Thiis v. Byers. 1 Q. B. Div. 244.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Verbeek v. Teller

    158 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 21, 2001

    The demotion was ratified by the Village Board of Trustees (the “Board”). . … Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 574 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); see also Vasbinder v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Isbrandtsen Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n

    256 F. Supp. 68 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 27, 1966

    National Marine Engineers’ Beneficial Association v. National Labor Relations Board, 274 F.2d 167 (2d Cir. 1960). … Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Di Silvestro v. United States Veterans Administration

    151 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 27, 1957

    The reconsideration (which was by a board completely different in personnel from the earlier one) resulted in a holding adverse to the plaintiff, the final paragraph of which reads: “It is the decision of the Board that the … See Ford v. United States, 5 Cir., 230 F.2d 533 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Aiello v. Town of Brookhaven

    149 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 5, 2001

    See Leesona Corp. v. … Brown, 659 F.Supp. 1008 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Leesona Corp., 522 F.Supp. 1304 ; Board of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. Dist. v. CNA Ins. Co., 113 F.R.D. 654 (S.D.N.Y.1987)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McLeod v. LOCAL 239, INTERNAT'L BRO. OF TEAMSTERS, ETC.

    179 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 7, 1960

    McLEOD, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. … It has been held that the requirement placed upon the Board is met by a showing that there is sufficient evidence to "demonstrate that there was a basis for the Board's finding". Douds v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kaynard v. Local 804, Delivery & Warehouse Employees, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    338 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 7, 1972

    B. v. Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, etc., 300 F.2d 237 , 242 (2 Cir. 1962). … Workers, AFL-CIO v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.