Case law

T.S. Haulers, Inc. v. Town of Riverhead

190 F. Supp. 2d 455 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 26, 2002

Within several months of the Town Board’s denial, T.S. … of Regents v.

GURNEY'S INN RESORT & SPA LTD. v. Benjamin

743 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 13, 2010

Renewal Project v. … Corp. v.

In re Berini

112 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 1953

petitioner is debarred from citizenship by virtue of section 3(a) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, was, in a case substantially analogous to the instant case, passed on by the Supreme Court in Moser v. … The remaining question is whether the 1952 Amendment of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 requires a different result, thus overruling Moser v. United States, supra.

Moore v. Kibbee

381 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 17, 1974

McGuire Shaft & Tunnel Corp. v. Local Union No. 1791, U.M.W., 475 F.2d 1209 (Em.App., 1973), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 958 , 93 S.Ct. 3008 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1973). In Board of Regents v. … The instant case poses many striking similarities to Williams v. Hyde County Board of Education, supra.

United States v. Boccadisi

468 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 9, 1979

Requests for relief based on illegal or improper actions of the parole board are cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and not under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . This is the explicit holding of the court in Wright v. … See also United States v. DiRusso, 535 F.2d 673 (CA1 1976); United States v. DiRusso, 548 F.2d 372 (CA1 1976); Jarrells v. United States, 396 F.Supp. 761 (D.C.Md.1975).

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees

185 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 1, 1960

The Emergency Board conducted investigations and made its findings on June 2, 1960. … See, American Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n Intern., D.C.N.Y.1958, 169 F.Supp. 777, 793 .

Dustin v. Murray

8 F. Cas. 144 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 15, 1871

Wells v. Meldrun [Case No. 17,402]; Emerson v. Howland [Id. 4,441]; Orne v. Townsend [Id. 10,583]. … That she was such, was apparent to the crew when they went on board.

Ragusa v. Malverne Union Free School District

582 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2008

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff (“Plaintiff’) Biljana Ragusa filed the present action against defendants Málveme Union Free School District (the “District”), Málveme Union Free School District Board of Education (the “Board”), and … Summary judgment is generally inappropriate where questions of the defendant’s state of mind are at issue, Gelb v. Board of Elections of the City of New York, 224 F.3d 149, 157 (2d.

Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n v. Metropolitan New York Dry Wall Contractors Ass'n

543 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1982

Compare, e.g., Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. … Rochdale Village v.

Wallerstein v. Primerica Corp.

701 F. Supp. 393 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 15, 1988

Radol v. Thomas, 534 F.Supp. 1302, 1315 (S.D.Ohio 1982). … Pertinent as well is Stedman v.

Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. Williams

862 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 1994

These activities are said to be the result of Board policies, thereby rendering the Board answerable in damages to the Tenenbaums. … CWA did not need the approval of the Board’s employees to effect the removal, and the Board’s employees had no right to obstruct the removal.

United States ex rel. Kustas v. Williams

98 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 7, 1951

See also, Lewis v. Frick, 233 U.S. 291 at page 297, 34 S.Ct. 488 , 58 L.Ed. 967 ; United States ex rel. Volpe v. Smith, 289 U.S. 422 at page 425, 53 S.Ct. 665 , 77 L.Ed. 1298 . … D'Istria v. Day, 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 302 at page 303; Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme v. Elting, 2 Cir., 61 F.2d 745 at page 746; United States ex rel. Wei Yan Mun v.

O'Reilly v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre

District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 8, 2025

On April 18, 2018 the Zoning Board granted Plaintiffs’ variance and on July 10, 2018, Plaintiffs’ application finally reached the Planning Board. … Evans v. Calise, No. 92-CV-8430, 1994 WL 185696, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 1994); see also Mandell v. The Maxon Co., Inc., No. 06-CV-460, 2007 WL 3022552, at *1 (S.D.N.Y.

Booye v. A Cargo of Dry Boards

42 F. 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 10, 1890

, having been kiln-dried, could not be put on board in such weather without damage. … Thiis v. Byers. 1 Q. B. Div. 244.

Noz v. Columbian Brokerage, Inc.

472 F. Supp. 1196 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 12, 1979

See Cunningham v. Brown, 265 U.S. 1 , 44 S.Ct. 424 , 68 L.Ed. 873 (1923); 4A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 70.25[2] at 359-60 (14th Ed. 1978). … Cunningham v.

Bloom v. Fox News of Los Angeles

528 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 6, 2007

See Bloom v. American Board of Neurological Surgery, et al., No. 03-4174, slip op. at 2-8 (E.D.N.Y. March 27, 2007). … Proceedings of the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct have been interpreted as official proceedings for the purposes of § 74. See Elibol v.

Bay Shore Union Free School District v. T. Ex Rel. R.

405 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 21, 2005

See Board of Educ. v. … See also, Board of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 01-CV-6845 (GBD), 2005 WL 22866 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.

Lapir v. Maimonides Medical Center

750 F. Supp. 1171 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 8, 1990

After denial by the Hearing and Appeals Board, a union member has a right to request a review by the division Hearing and Appeals Board. … Abels, one of the delegates on the Board of Appeals, demonstrates that he harbored animosity toward plaintiff. While inferences of discriminatory intent or malice are’ generally best left to a jury, see Ramseur v.

NLRB v. State of NY

436 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 22, 1977

436 F.Supp. 335 (1977) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney General of the State of New York, and Robert P. … This does not foreclose the Board from proceeding with the present action. See United States v.

Reliable Transfer Co. v. United States

53 F.R.D. 24 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 18, 1971

Nothing to the contrary is held in Bank Line, Ltd. v. United States, 163 F.2d 133 (2d Cir. 1947), on which plaintiff relies. That case related to the findings of a Naval Board of Inquiry concerning a collision. … The libellant sought only the testimony of the witnesses who were heard by the Board of Inquiry, and not the findings or opinions of the Board.