Case law

United States v. Schrieber

367 F. Supp. 791 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 17, 1973

Mainer v. United States Attorney General, 5th Cir. 1970, 429 F.2d 389, 391 . … risk if bail is available at all. *792 Morrissey v.

United States v. Brennan

685 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 13, 1988

In United States v. … The acts underlying the predicate offenses put to the jury in petitioner’s trial were related, as in Weisman , rather than distinct, as in Brown . United States v.

L & S Realty Co. LLC v. The Town Board of The Town of Hempstead

District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 16, 2024

By way of Complaint dated September 14, 2023, Plaintiff commenced this action against Defendants the Town Board of the Town of Hempstead (the “Town Board”) and Department of Buildings of the Town of Hempstead (“Buildings … Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93, 98, 118 S. Ct. 488, 493 (1997) (quoting U.S. Const., Amend. V).

T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Inc. Village of East Hills

779 F. Supp. 2d 256 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 2011

Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Brookhaven, 244 F.Supp.2d 108, 114 (E.D.N.Y.2003). … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann, 9 F.3d 1049, 1054 (2d Cir.1993); Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 299-300 (2d Cir.1992). SO ORDERED. 1 .

Vernon Lumber Corporation v. Harcen Const. Co.

60 F. Supp. 555 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 19, 1945

Co. v. Mowry, 96 U.S. 544 , 24 L.Ed. 674 . … Crown Embroidery Works v. Gordon, 190 App.Div. 472 , 180 N.Y.S. 158 ; Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. Portland & Asiatic S. S. Co., D. C. Or.1909, 167 F. 1010 ; Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro v. C. G.

Stein v. Oshinsky

224 F. Supp. 757 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 20, 1963

In Zorach v. … See also West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 ; Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 470 , 12 S.Ct. 511 , 36 L.Ed. 226 ; Lawrence v.

All American Airways, Inc. v. Village of Cedarhurst

106 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 1, 1952

In the case of Spector Motor Co. v. … The case of East Coast Lumber Terminal, Inc., v.

Romano v. Harrington

725 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 29, 1989

Additionally, an earlier Supreme Court case, Board of Education Island Trees v. … Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). CONCLUSION Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied. SO ORDERED. 1 .

T.S. Haulers, Inc. v. Town of Riverhead

190 F. Supp. 2d 455 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 26, 2002

Within several months of the Town Board’s denial, T.S. … of Regents v.

GURNEY'S INN RESORT & SPA LTD. v. Benjamin

743 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 13, 2010

Renewal Project v. … Corp. v.

In re Berini

112 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 1953

petitioner is debarred from citizenship by virtue of section 3(a) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, was, in a case substantially analogous to the instant case, passed on by the Supreme Court in Moser v. … The remaining question is whether the 1952 Amendment of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 requires a different result, thus overruling Moser v. United States, supra.

Bokkelen v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.

432 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 1977

Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 401 , 84 S.Ct. 923, 926 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 , and applies to “acts done within their own states in the exercise of governmental authority.” Underhill v. … See also, Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, supra, 376 U.S. at 427-428 , 84 S.Ct. 923 .

Moore v. Kibbee

381 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 17, 1974

McGuire Shaft & Tunnel Corp. v. Local Union No. 1791, U.M.W., 475 F.2d 1209 (Em.App., 1973), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 958 , 93 S.Ct. 3008 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1973). In Board of Regents v. … The instant case poses many striking similarities to Williams v. Hyde County Board of Education, supra.

Lutheran Medical Center v. Thompson

520 F. Supp. 2d 414 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 27, 2007

Colleges v. … Ctr. v.

Lombardo v. The Town of Hempstead

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 30, 2020

. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 5–CV–5579, -- -------------- 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

Frisenda v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF MALVERNE

775 F. Supp. 2d 486 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2011

from that lawsuit to gain favor with the Village Board. … Jan. 25, 2008) (holding that letter that was copied to the school’s Board of Directors was written pursuant to her duties and was not protected speech); see also Knight v.

Vanerio v. Internal Revenue Service

629 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 10, 1986

The search revealed a kilogram of cocaine inside a brown bag similar to the one Delfo Vanerio had been carrying. The Segovias were arrested and interrogated. … See Cantillo v. Coleman, supra, 559 F.Supp. at 207 .

Ragusa v. Malverne Union Free School District

582 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2008

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff (“Plaintiff’) Biljana Ragusa filed the present action against defendants Málveme Union Free School District (the “District”), Málveme Union Free School District Board of Education (the “Board”), and … Summary judgment is generally inappropriate where questions of the defendant’s state of mind are at issue, Gelb v. Board of Elections of the City of New York, 224 F.3d 149, 157 (2d.

Kaplan v. ITT-U.S. Transmission Systems Inc.

589 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 13, 1984

See also Mobil Oil Corp. v. … Id., at 707 (quoting Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 834 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1968 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)).

Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. Williams

862 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 1994

These activities are said to be the result of Board policies, thereby rendering the Board answerable in damages to the Tenenbaums. … CWA did not need the approval of the Board’s employees to effect the removal, and the Board’s employees had no right to obstruct the removal.