Case law

Wentworth v. Hedson

248 F.R.D. 121 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 15, 2008

Brown v. Brown, 343 F.Supp.2d 195, 199 (E.D.N.Y.2004) (citing Clark v. Tansy, 13 F.3d 1407, 1411 (10th Cir.1993)). … See Brown, 343 F.Supp.2d at 197-98 . However, the Wentworths have failed to show that Hedson’s counterclaims lack "an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” See Neitzke v.

Tufano v. One Toms Point Lane Corp.

64 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 13, 1999

Tufano’s failure to satisfy the condition precedent of co-op board approval precludes a finding that the Kalinskys breached the contract. See Shandler v. … Moreover, the co-op board cannot be ordered to sell the subject shares to Tufano because it does not own them. See R & R Homes v.

Kanciper v. Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc.

925 F. Supp. 2d 379 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 23, 2013

Selim, Note, Remedial and Coercive Administrative Proceedings Under Younger: The Tenth Circuit’s Test in Brown v. Day, 2010 BYU L.Rev. 267 (2010). … See Brown v.

Richards v. New York Appellate Division, Second Department

597 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 31, 1984

At a subsequent parole hearing, plaintiff “got hit by the Board with a year[.]” Complaint ¶ 25. … Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 , 10 S.Ct. 504 , 33 L.Ed. 842 (1890); Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 , 98 S.Ct. 3057 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978).

United States v. Conserva

38 F. 431 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 5, 1889

S. v. … Rep. 799, (a ease lately tried before Judge BrowN in the Southern district-of New York,) which testimony has been read in this case by consent-, from which it appears that guns apparently intended to' be used to arm *439

Libutti v. Di Brizzi

233 F. Supp. 924 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 7, 1964

Harvey v. Calhoon, 2 Cir. 1963, 324 F.2d 486 . The contention that union members must first exhaust intraunion procedures is untenable. … It is obvious that this would be futile because the action of the' Board is contrary to the plaintiff’s position. In Farowitz v.

United States ex rel. Browne & Bryan Lumber Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

195 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 12, 1961

United States for Use of Acme Maintenance Engineering Co. v. Wunderlich Contracting Co., 10 Cir., 228 F.2d 66 , at page 68; United States to Use and for Benefit of Foster Wheeler Corp. v. … Johnson v. Morley Const. Co., 2 Cir., 98 F.2d 781 , at page 789; United States for Use of Baltimore Cooperage Co. v. McCay, D.C., 28 F.2d 777 , at page 780, Point 10.

Wilchfort v. Knight

307 F. Supp. 3d 64 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 2018

Instead, the Form S-3 only conferred " discretionary power" to the board, and the board's refusal to exercise that power could not form the basis of a breach of contract claim. Id. … See Brown v. Nationscredit Fin. Servs. Corp. , 32 So.3d 661 , 662 n.1 (Fla. Dist. Ct.

United States Ex Rel. LaSalle v. Smith

632 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 11, 1986

People v. Brown, supra; United States v. Aulet, supra; United States v. Cruz, 785 F.2d 399 (2d Cir.1986). … People v. Brown, supra, 45 N.Y.2d at 854, 410 N.Y.S.2d 287 , 382 N.E.2d 1149 .

Mhany Management Inc. v. County of Nassau

843 F. Supp. 2d 287 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 15, 2012

Doe v. … Hack v. President & Fellows of Yale Coll, 237 F.3d 81 , 90-91 (2d Cir.2000) (quoting Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 712 (2d Cir. 1998)).

Davis v. Town of Hempstead

296 F. Supp. 2d 376 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 12, 2003

Town of Hempstead v. Davis, (N.Y.Sup.Ct. … Town of Hempstead v. Davis, (N.Y. Sup. Ct.

Lombardo v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

502 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 24, 1980

Brown stated that “[pjatients with recurrent neuropathies often do have severe, recurrent and unremitting pain” (id.). … Bastien v. Califano, 572 F.2d 908 (2d Cir. 1978). Indeed, none of the other numerous medical reports in the record, including Dr.

McMillan v. City of New York

253 F.R.D. 247 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 14, 2008

Plessy’s “racial” basis was entirely rejected by Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). The Saginaw has no precedential value. 1. … Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1817 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1967) (“race”-based restrictions on marriage unconstitutional); Brown, supra (abolishing segregation in public schools); Bolling v.

United States v. Nagelberg

772 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 1991

U.S. v. Bonanno, 683 F.Supp. 1411, 1449 (E.D.N.Y.1988) (citing Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-64 , 103 S.Ct. 608, 617 , 74 L.Ed.2d 430 (1983)). … Passalacqua Builders, Inc. v. Resnick Developers South, Inc., 933 F.2d 131, 138 (2d Cir.1991) (citing Gartner v.

United States v. Midyett

603 F. Supp. 2d 450 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 22, 2009

Sur-Reply”), dated January 12, 2009, at p. 2); U.S. v. Brown et al., 596 F.Supp.2d 611, 616-24 (E.D.N.Y.2009); U.S. v. Midyett, No. 07-cr-874, 2009 WL 363905 , at *4, *5, 2009 U.S. Dist. … (Midyett Aff. at ¶ 1-4); Brown, 596 F.Supp.2d at 613-14 .

Moore v. Kibbee

385 F. Supp. 765 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 19, 1974

Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968); Rogers v. Paul, 382 U.S. 198 , 86 S.Ct. 358 , 15 L.Ed.2d 265 (1965); Bradley v. … Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation, 327 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1964); Williams v. Hyde County Board of Education, 490 F.2d 1231 (4th Cir. 1974).

General Electric Co. v. Argonaut S. S. Line, Inc.

7 F. Supp. 710 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 10, 1934

But a similar transshipment clause was considered in Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Dampkiesaktieselskabet Balto, cited, as indeed it was in Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co., 170 U. S. 272 , 18 S. Ct. 588, 590 , 42 L. … The facts in the Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co.

Grandview Dairy, Inc. v. Jones

61 F. Supp. 460 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 11, 1945

United States, 1937, 300 U.S. 297 , 57 S.Ct. 478 , 81 L.Ed. 659 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Company, 1941, 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; Gray v. … Powell, 1941, 314 U.S. 402 , 62 S.Ct. 326 , 86 L.Ed. 301 ; Board of Trade of Kansas City v. *462 United States, 1942, 314 U.S. 534 , 62 S.Ct. 366 , 86 L.Ed. 432 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Herzog v. Russell

483 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 17, 1979

In Tannenbaum v. … Tannenbaum v. Zeller, supra. There was also evidence at trial that Board members were interested in seeking recapture which they considered in the Fund’s best interest.

United States v. Moncrieffe

167 F. Supp. 3d 383 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 10, 2016

Brown, 243 A.D.2d 363 , 663 N.Y.S.2d 539, 540 (1st Dep’t 1997) (attempting to push the victim); People v. … WASHINGTON: The determination of Board of Immigration Appeals was that he pled either to use of a deadly weapon— THE COURT: ... How [did] the Board know that? MS.