Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

1.21s

  • United States ex rel. Arena v. New York

    497 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 1980

    Similarly, in Jackson v. … See People v. Yannett, and People v. Keeffe.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tillim v. Huntington Housing Authority

    97 F. Supp. 2d 290 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 11, 2000

    (NAACP) v. Town of East Haven, 70 F.3d 219, 224 (2d Cir.1995) (citing Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. Schlesinger, 888 F.2d 969, 975 [2d Cir.1989]); Weinberger v. … The Second Circuit, in Marchi v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    575 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 30, 1983

    Davis v. … The board declined to hear argument based on section 503, stating that “[t]he authority of the Board of Adjustment derives from the Agreement between the parties.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Ocilla Industries, Inc. v. Katz

    677 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 2, 1987

    See Baker’s Aid v. … Hanson Trust PLC v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Laface v. E. Suffolk Boces

    349 F. Supp. 3d 126 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 15, 2018

    SPATT, District Judge: On March 1, 2018, John Laface ("Laface" or the "Plaintiff") commenced this action against Eastern Suffolk BOCES ("BOCES"), the Eastern Suffolk BOCES Board of Trustees (the "Board"), Dr. … Brown v. New York , 975 F.Supp.2d 209 , 242 (N.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting Martz , 22 F.3d at 30 ).

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Lombardi v. Ambach

    522 F. Supp. 867 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 17, 1981

    In Riley v. … In this case we believe that, as was true in Riley v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Skibo v. City of New York

    109 F.R.D. 58 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 24, 1985

    See Brown v. Matias, 102 F.R.D. 580 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Lora v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 74 F.R.D. 565 (E.D.N.Y.1977). … In Grandstaff v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Vanacore v. United States

    440 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 16, 1977

    Wiley v. United States Board of Parole, supra at 944. Moreover, this court was under no misapprehension, but was well aware of the standardized nature of the guidelines at the time of sentencing. United States v. … Freeman v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 16-17 , 254 F.2d 352, 353-54 (1958). Challenges to parole board decisions are beyond its pale. This court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Conservatorship of United Independent Federal Credit Union, Charter No. 01603

    768 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 26, 1991

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gonzalez v. City of New York

    135 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 28, 2001

    See Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957). … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 at 572-73 , 92 S.Ct. at 2706-07 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, Inc. v. Doe Nos. 1-25

    172 F. Supp. 2d 383 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 9, 2001

    See Gilliam v. … See Effects Assoc. v. Cohen, 908 F.2d 555 , 558 (9th Cir.1990) (Kozinski, J.); Encyclopedia Brown Productions, Ltd v. Home Box Office, 91 Civ. 4092, 1998 WL 734355 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 1998).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

    607 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 24, 1985

    “Minor disputes” in the airline industry, by contrast, are resolved by mandatory grievance arbitration procedures before the System Board of Adjustment. Air Cargo, Inc. v. … Indeed, to this extent, Pan Am’s position is supported by a previous adjustment board decision construing language identical to Article 14. See Pan American World Airways, Inc. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Altmeyer

    46 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 1, 1942

    Jones v. Goodson, supra, 121 F.2d page 179.” In the case of Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. … After complying with this direction, a judgment-was later entered in conformity with the-decision which reversed the conclusions, reached by the Board. In the matter of Carroll v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McLeod v. District 65, Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union

    207 F. Supp. 680 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 1, 1962

    the said Board. … See Cuneo v. United Shoe Workers of America, D.C., 181 F.Supp. 324 . The petitioner is entitled to the relief prayed for. Settle decree on notice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District 100, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Compagnie Nationale Air France

    414 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 9, 1976

    Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 [722-724], 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 , it is a minor dispute no matter how seriously it may affect the parties to the contract.” Aaxico Airlines, Inc. v. … Ass’n, EAL Chapter v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 359 F.2d 303, 309-10 (2 Cir. 1966). Accordingly, Air France’s motion for summary judgment on this ground is granted. III.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kissinger v. United States

    176 F. Supp. 828 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 14, 1959

    Hawn v. American S.S. Co., supra. … Senko v. La Crosse Dredging Corp., 352 U.S. 370 , 77 S.Ct. 415 , 1 L.Ed.2d 404 , Hercules Co., Inc. v. The Brigadier General Absolom Baird, 3 Cir., 214 F.2d 66 and Pleason v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Duralite Co. v. Local 485, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers

    207 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 22, 1962

    From this conduct several unfair labor practice charges were filed with the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”). … See Ebinger Baking Co. v. Local 802, D.C. N.Y., 1961, 194 F.Supp. 617 ; Restatement of Contracts, § 607. . An analogy may be drawn from contracts prohibited by law. Restatement of Contracts, § 508. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Plymouth County Retirement Ass'n v. Schroeder

    576 F. Supp. 2d 360 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 5, 2008

    When the members of the board of directors of a corporation have a fiduciary duty to take action, a court cannot be certain that the board will breach that duty. See Elfenbein v. … See Winters v. Stemberg, 529 F.Supp.2d 237, 246-47 (D.Mass.2008); Quaak v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Equus Associates Ltd. v. Town of Southampton

    975 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 27, 1997

    of Regents v. … Doe v. Marsh, 105 F.3d 106, 109 (2d Cir.1997); Salim v. Proulx, 93 F.3d 86, 89 (2d Cir.1996); Lennon v. Miller, 66 F.3d 416, 420 (2d Cir.1995).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • GSE Dynamics, Inc. v. Doe

    381 F. Supp. 1088 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 24, 1974

    Brown, who participated in the pre-award survey conducted on October 16, 1973, and the testimony of Major William M. … Dino DeLaurentiis Cinematografica, S.p.A. v. D-150, Inc., 366 F.2d 373, 375 (2nd Cir., 1966).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.