Case law

Horowitz v. Anker

437 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 7, 1977

See, e. g., East Hartford Education Association v. Board of Education, 562 F.2d 838, p. 856 (2 Cir.), decided en banc August 19, 1977. … Pickering v. Board of Education, supra, at 568-570, 88 S.Ct. 1731 .

Edwards v. Jericho Union Free School District

904 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 16, 2012

It is well-settled that school principals, such as Prisinzano and Sinanis, are not “officers” of the District or Board within the meaning of the statute. 2 See Rosenberg v. … McKinnon v.

Caramico v. Romney

390 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 13, 1973

More recently in Mitchum v. Foster, 1972, 407 U.S. 225 , 92 S.Ct. 2151 , 32 L.Ed.2d 705 , the Court, while dispelling the notion that Younger v. … And, in any event McGuane v.

Oxford House, Inc. v. Town of Babylon

819 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 28, 1993

(Excerpts from Regular Town Board Meeting of September 3, 1991, p. 1 (hereafter “Town Board Meeting”)). … (Town Board Meeting, p. 3). 9 .

United States v. Hayes

52 F.2d 977 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 15, 1931

S. v. One Ford Coupe, supra; U. S. v. La Franca, 282 U. S. 569 , 51 S. Ct. 278 , 75 L. Ed. 551 . … Stacey v. Emery, 97 U. S. 642, 645 , 24 L. Ed. 1035 . I conclude therefore that “probable cause” existed. Husty v. U. S., 282 U. S. 694 , 51 S. Ct. 240 , 75 L. Ed. 629 ; Awalt v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 47 F.(2d) 477 ; U.

Finkel v. Triple a Group, Inc.

708 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 27, 2010

U.S. v. Ponte, 246 F.Supp.2d 74, 76 (D.Me.2003) (citation omitted). See also Au Bon Pain Corp. v. … A letter sent to TAG by the Joint Board dated July 13, 2007, demands interest in the amount of $439.40. Sessa 11/7/07 Decl. V 35, Ex.

The Medford

65 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 30, 1946

TRAWLER MEDFORD, Inc., v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. TRAWLER MEDFORD, Inc. JOHANNSSON v. UNITED STATES. Nos. A-17668, A-17728, A-17675. District Court, E. D. New York. … See also McCabe et al. v. Old Dominion Steam-Ship Co., D.C., 31 F. 234, 240 , not cited.

Carter v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF OCEAN BEACH

693 F. Supp. 2d 203 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 19, 2010

See Weintraub v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, 593 F.3d 196, 201 (2d Cir.2010); see also Davis v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Strez

320 F.R.D. 9 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 15, 2017

PRC Harris, Inc. v. … Hanover Trust Co. v. Yanakas, 11 F.3d 381, 385 (2d Cir. 1993). In United States Bancorp Mortgage Co. v.

Guttmann v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.

91 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 1950

These two cases, Wabash v. Barclay, supra, and New York v. … In Patterson v.

Ocilla Industries, Inc. v. Katz

677 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 2, 1987

See Baker’s Aid v. … Hanson Trust PLC v.

Cincinnati, H. & D. Ry. Co. v. Orr

215 F. 261 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 3, 1914

C.) 199 Fed. 667 , Brown v. Fletcher, 206 Fed. 461 , 124 C. C. A. 367 , Con. Rub. Co. v. Ferguson, 183 Fed. 756 , 106 C. C. A. 330 , and North American Trans. Co. v. Morrison, 178 U. S. 263 , 20 Sup. Ct. 869, 44 L. … Co. v. Morrison, supra, and Brown v. Fletcher, supra, were disposed of upon defects in pleading or because the assignors were residents of the same district as the defendant. The case of Con. Rub. Co. v.

Paszel v. Laird

308 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 1969

United States v. Burlich, 257 F.Supp. 906, 911 (S.D.N.Y.1966). II Ordinarily a decision of the Board on a question of classification may be overturned only if there is no basis in fact to support it. Witmer v. … The Board’s mere disbelief is not sufficient, of itself, to justify the rejection of a claim for exemption as a C.O. Batterton v. United States, 260 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1958).

Vanacore v. United States

440 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 16, 1977

Wiley v. United States Board of Parole, supra at 944. Moreover, this court was under no misapprehension, but was well aware of the standardized nature of the guidelines at the time of sentencing. United States v. … Freeman v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 16-17 , 254 F.2d 352, 353-54 (1958). Challenges to parole board decisions are beyond its pale. This court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

Cooper v. Town of East Hampton

888 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 17, 1995

Similarly, in McDonald v. … See also Garland v.

Magnus v. Fortune Brands, Inc.

41 F. Supp. 2d 217 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 18, 1999

Defendant Brown & Williamson Industries, Inc. is the parent of Brown & Williamson. Defendant Fortune Brands, Inc. … Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp., 1998 WL 846783 * 5 (E.D.N.Y.); Lacey v. Lorillard Tobacco Co., Inc., 956 F.Supp. 956, 962 (N.D.Ala. 1997) (dismissing fraudulent suppression claim); Griesenbeck v.

Nastro v. Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund

755 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 29, 1991

Mitchell v. Mobil Oil Corp., 896 F.2d 463 , 473 (10th Cir.1990); Brown v. Stenger, No. 85-4073, 1988 WL 70603 (E.D.N.Y. May 25, 1988) (LEXIS, Genfed library, Dist file). … In Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v.

Berg v. Glen Cove City School District

853 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 1, 1994

Board of Education, 852 F.2d 676, 679 (2d Cir.1988) (quoting Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc., 596 F.2d 70, 72 (2d Cir.1979) (per cu-riam)). … Mason v. General Brown Cent. School Dist., 851 F.2d 47 , 51-52 (2d Cir.1988). Thus, this Court must first determine whether plaintiffs’ purported beliefs are “religious.”

United States v. State of New York

3 F. Supp. 2d 298 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 7, 1998

United States v. Board of Commissioners of Sheffield, Alabama, 435 U.S. 110, 131-132 , 98 S.Ct. 965 , 55 L.Ed.2d 148 (1978). … Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) (“The remarks of a single legislator, even the sponsor, are not controlling in analyzing legislative histoiy.”); General Media Communications, Inc. v.

United States ex rel. Arena v. New York

497 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 1980

Similarly, in Jackson v. … See People v. Yannett, and People v. Keeffe.