Case law

Brown v. Hyman

27 N.Y.S. 436 · New York County Courts · Jan 15, 1894

The opinion of the court in Townsend v. Tolhurst, 57 Hun, 40 , 10 N. Y. Supp. 378 , makes the proper and logical distinction in the application and authority of the case of Dieffenbach v. … Roch, as likewise does the case of Bolt v. Hauser, 57 Hun, 567 , 11 N. Y. Supp. 366, 368 . I think the cases last cited should control the disposition of this motion, and therefore do not consider that Herrmann v.

People v. Brown

206 Misc. 430 · New York County Courts · Sep 14, 1954

Rand v. Craig, 231 N. Y. 216, 221 ). The court has some doubt whether the items for which counsel seek advanced approval are such “ personal and incidental expenses ’ ’ as are authorized by statute. … Matter of Reilly v. Berry, 250 N. Y. 456 , and People v. Fernandez, 202 Misc. 190 .)

People v. Brown

96 Misc. 2d 244 · New York County Courts · Sep 26, 1978

(People v Anonymous, 58 Misc 2d 13 .) … (People v Taylor, 27 NY2d 327 ; People v Wade, 35 AD2d 401 .)

Owen v. Brown

78 Misc. 273 · New York County Courts · Nov 15, 1912

Co. v. Holman, 150 App. Div. 678 . … Hence the complaint is amendable under the authority of Van Clief v. Van Vechten, 130 N. Y. 571 . But see Heffron v. Jennings, 66 App.

People v. Brown

28 N.Y. Crim. 154 · New York County Courts · Sep 15, 1912

Lotz v. Norton, 76 Hun, 7 , 27 N. Y. Supp. 851 , is not in point. … People v. Tower, 17 N. Y. Supp. 395 . After carefully considering all the points, I am of the opinion that the application for an allowance of the appeal herein must be denied. Application denied.

Brown v. Broome County

20 Misc. 2d 908 · New York County Courts · Aug 10, 1959

This is an action brought by Dorothy Brown, a widow, individually and as guardian ad litem for her children Robert Brown and Dennis Brown against Broome County, to recover damages on the claim that one of the coroners of … This cause of action arose out of an incident which happened on the 10th day of February, 1958 when one Francis Brown, the deceased husband of the plaintiff Dorothy Brown, was found *909 dead in the Delaware and Hudson Railroad

Kank Realty Co. v. Brown

114 Misc. 357 · New York County Courts · Feb 15, 1921

In this holding I believe I am supported by the more authoritative cases, and I feel that the language of Judge Bari in Losee v. Buchanan, 51 N.

Miller v. Board

37 N.Y.S. 766 · New York County Courts · Dec 15, 1895

In the case of Nichols v. … In the case of Hall v. Lauderdale, 46 N.

People v. Brown

190 Misc. 2d 710 · New York County Courts · Mar 13, 2002

Reasonably believes as contained in article 35 of the Penal Law involves both a subjective and objective test (see, People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96 ). … (People v Starkes, supra at 190 , quoting L 1999, ch 635, § 2, reprinted following Penal Law § 120.50; internal quotation marks omitted.)

People v. Brown

186 Misc. 2d 410 · New York County Courts · Nov 17, 2000

In People *413 v Soto ( 77 Misc 2d 427 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1974]), the court examined the same language in the recently enacted statute. … Five years later, without elaboration, the Second Department reached the same conclusion, citing Watson (supra) with approval, in People v Rivera ( 221 AD2d 380 [2d Dept 1995]).

People v. Brown

170 Misc. 2d 266 · New York County Courts · Aug 29, 1996

The first issue the court will address is whether defendants Brown and Rochester were entitled to a jury trial. The town prosecutor argues that they were not. … Lind v New York, 506 US 1011 ).

People v. Brown

21 Misc. 2d 549 · New York County Courts · Mar 8, 1960

Defendant Brown was arrested on or about November 1,1952, charged with first degree assault and third degree burglary. Thereafter he was convicted, and sentenced on or about February 24,1953. … (People v. Moylan, 4 Misc 2d 747 ; People v. Lewis, 12 Misc 2d 266 ; People v. Brown, 3 A D 2d 696; People v. Pitts, 6NY2d288.) Submit order.

People v. Brown

26 Misc. 2d 906 · New York County Courts · Dec 12, 1960

His present acknowledgment that the stolen cab was worth less than $100 brings this case within the principle set forth in People v. … (People v. Foster, supra, p. 77 .) I find that the value of the taxicab on the day it was stolen was less than $100.

Halsey v. Brown

177 Misc. 415 · New York County Courts · Sep 9, 1941

at the same time by Brown. … Hamersley contends that these cross-complaints are premature in that neither McArdle nor Brown has been injured. The cases hold otherwise. (Belloni v. Freeborn, 63 N. Y. 383 ; 755 Seventh Ave. Corp. v.

Brown v. Quinlan

95 Misc. 95 · New York County Courts · Apr 15, 1916

People v. Brown

86 Misc. 339 · New York County Courts · Nov 26, 1975

When Justice Harnett learned of the death he informed the defendant, Jo-Anne Brown. She and her children had resided with the deceased. … (People v Coffey, 42 Mich App 683 ; Commonwealth v Eisen, 358 Mass 740, revd sub nom Eisen v Picard, 452 F2d 860; Harvey v State of Mississippi, 207 So 2d 108 [Miss]; Green v United States, 389 F2d 949; State v Whittemore

Brown v. Mathewson

71 Misc. 110 · New York County Courts · Feb 15, 1911

Canfield v. Monger, 12 Johns. 347 ; Tuska v. O’Brien, 68 N. … Hess v. Beekman, 11 Johns. 457 ; Smith v. McMillan, 90 Hun, 542 . In Smith v.

Brown v. Edinger

61 Misc. 366 · New York County Courts · Dec 15, 1908

He cites the case of People v. Hoyt, 3 Utah, 396 . … People v. Albany, 1 Wend. 55 '0.

Naylor v. Brown

32 Misc. 298 · New York County Courts · Jul 15, 1900

Kalbfleisch v. Kalbfieisch, 67 N. Y. 354 . But the defendants, the heirs of George McCrabbie, present a more troublesome proposition in this case. … In Baxter v. Baxter, 76 Hun, 98 , it was held that the decree of the surrogate was not conclusive as to the mental capacity of the testator. In Harris v. Harris, 26 N.

Bush v. Election Board

177 Misc. 335 · New York County Courts · Oct 23, 1941

He notified one or more members of the election board of his desire to be registered as a voter of the town of McDonough and the election board has failed to place his name and his wife’s name upon the registration books. … The election board apparently relies for its authority upon section 175 of the Election Law. That section does not apply to this case, but merely applies after being registered under section 153-a or section 153-b.