Case law

Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. Johnson

11 A.D.2d 1086 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 20, 1960

Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. McDowell

11 A.D.2d 972 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1960

Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. Schneider

9 A.D.2d 636 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 23, 1959

City of Johnstown v. Water Pollution Control Board

13 A.D.2d 610 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 1961

Board of Education v. Niagara Wrecking & Lumber Co.

17 A.D.2d 761 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 13, 1962

Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. Pelletier

14 A.D.2d 991 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1961

Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. Johnson

12 A.D.2d 991 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 1961

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Budoff

5 A.D.2d 854 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1958

People ex rel. Dunn v. Board of Sup'rs

118 N.Y.S. 1133 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1909

Morrin v. Structural Steel Board of Trade, Inc.

232 A.D. 664 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1931

C. & W. Construction Co. v. Board of Education

250 A.D. 715 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 26, 1937

People ex rel. Manley v. Board of Supervisors

148 A.D. 584 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1911

In fact it shows that the board of supervisors were conscientiously endeavoring to do their duty. … It was a matter that was peculiarly within the province of the board of supervisors.

Strax v. Rockland County Board

258 A.D.2d 578 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 11, 1999

his or her employment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of a statutory proscription (see, Matter of Girards v Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 1020 ; see also, James v Board of Educ., 37 … NY2d 891, 892 ; Matter of Bergstein v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 318, 322 ).

Pickett v. Town of Tusten Zoning Board of Appeals

169 A.D.2d 906 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 10, 1991

Failure to commence a proceeding within this time period requires dismissal of the petition (see, e.g., Sutherland v Lalli, 143 AD2d 827 ; Matter of Bayer v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 133 AD2d 83 ). … Chmielewski, 146 AD2d 102 , affd 76 NY2d 182 ; Matter of De Beilis v Luney, 128 AD2d 778 ).

Hall v. Madison-Oneida County Board of Cooperative Educational Services

66 A.D.3d 1434 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2009

] [a]), that failure “ ‘is not fatal where . . . actual notice was had and there is no compelling showing of prejudice to [respondent]’ ” (Hale v Webster Cent. … School Dist., 12 AD3d 1052, 1053 [2004]; see Matter of LaMay v County of Oswego, 49 AD3d 1351, 1352 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 715 [2008]). Here, claimant “made a persuasive showing that [respondent] . . .

Strafford v. New York State Board of Parole

130 A.D.2d 753 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 26, 1987

Accordingly, this appeal is moot (see, Matter of Tremarco v New York State Bd. of Parole, 58 NY2d 968 ). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.

11 A.D.2d 622 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1960

(Stevens v. O’Neill, 51 App. Div. 364 , affd. 169 N. Y. 375 ; McLoughlin v. New York Edison Co., 252 N. Y. 202, 205 ; 1 Harper & James, Law of Torts, p. 229; cf. Gill v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 284 App. Div. 36 .) … Blumenfeld v. Harris (3 A D 2d 219, affd. 3 N Y 2d 905) upon which the trial court relied, is distinguishable on its facts.

Verdon v. Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Educational Services

47 A.D.3d 941 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 2008

Staatsburg Fire Dist., 72 NY2d 147, 156 [1988], quoting United States v Western Pacific R. … School Dist., 306 AD2d 732 [2003]; Matter of Mucci v City of Binghamton, 245 AD2d 678, 679 [1997]; Matter of Terrible v County of Rockland, 81 AD2d 837, 838 [1981]; Matter of Weimer v Board of Educ. of Smithtown Cent.

Board of Managers of Diplomat Condominium v. Bevona

160 A.D.2d 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1990

Since the premises were undergoing condominium conversion, the board of managers of the condominium and various managing agents were captioned in the matter as well.

Brown v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.

270 A.D.2d 346 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 2000

Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 ; Matter of Gradel v Lilholt, 257 AD2d 972 ; Matter of Alston v Morgan, 245 AD2d 287 ; Matter of Glinka v Town of Poughkeepsie, 209 AD2d 773 ; Matter of Romano v Town Bd., … The penalty of termination of employment was not so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ; Matter of Gradel v Lilholt,