Case law

Town of Huntington v. Estate of Edwin H. Brown, Inc.

267 A.D. 992 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1944

Mt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. Brown

7 A.D.2d 930 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 24, 1959

Thompson v. New York State Board of Elections

54 A.D.2d 531 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 30, 1976

The present proceeding was not properly instituted within the 14-day period required by subdivision 1 of section 330 of the Election Law (see Matter of Radda v Acito, 54 AD2d 531 ).

Lee v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Bethlehem

122 A.D.2d 423 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 17, 1986

Bernard show dogs had previously generated considerable conflict with City of Albany zoning officials (see, City of Albany v Lee, 76 AD2d 978 , affd 53 NY2d 633 ), purchased a home in the Town of Bethlehem, Albany County. … We find the Board’s determination deficient.

Board of Mgrs. of Washington Ct. Condominium v. Carl

2026 NY Slip Op 03918 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 2026

Board of Managers of Washington Court Condominium, Respondent, v Bernard J. Carl et al., Appellants, U.S. Bank National Association etc., et al., Defendants. … TR U/S 6/01/98 [Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-2] v Alvarez , 49 AD3d 711, 711 [2d Dept 2008]; see Board of Mgrs. of W. Amherst Off.

Deposit Central School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

214 A.D.2d 288 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 2, 1995

Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 547 ). … , 81 AD2d 691 ; see also, Matter of Cowan v Board of Educ., 99 AD2d 831, 833 , appeal discontinued 63 NY2d 702 ).

Mitchell v. Administrative Review Board of State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

302 A.D.2d 635 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 2003

Petitioner, a board-certified allergist and immunologist, was charged with numerous specifications of misconduct stemming from his care and treatment of patients A through G between 1994 and 1998. … As a starting point, even a cursory review of the record reveals that petitioner received adequate notice of the charges against him and a meaningful opportunity to be heard thereon (see generally Matter of Smith v Board

Gaudioso v. Board of Trustees of Fire Department

40 A.D.3d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2007

(see Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. … II, 60 NY2d 347 [1983]; Matter of Farley v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 13 AD3d 531 [2004]; Matter of Guidal v Board of Trustees of N.Y.

Groat v. Town Board of the Town of Glenville

73 A.D.2d 426 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1980

by the town board on June 29, 1976. … On appeal by the town board, this court affirmed (Matter of Groat v Town Bd. of Town of Glenville, 63 AD2d 1043 ).

Mt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. Brown

12 A.D.2d 623 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 1960

Tipon v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau

52 A.D.2d 1065 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 1976

Failure of respondent appeals board to render its decision within 60 days as provided in the regulation (15 NYCRR 125.5) did not deprive respondents of jurisdiction. … The determinations are confirmed for the reasons expressed by the appeals board in its determination letter to petitioner dated January 8, 1975.

Dhabuwala v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

225 A.D.2d 209 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 26, 1996

Ambach, 73 *213 NY2d 323 ; Matter of Murray v Murphy, 24 NY2d 150 ; Matter of Orozco v Sobol, 162 AD2d 834 ). … It is not a branch of the New York State Department of Health or the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct.

Maine-Endwell Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of Education

3 A.D.3d 685 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 2004

Estate of Thornton v Caldor, Inc., 472 US 703 [1985]). * The religious observance clause here is readily distinguishable from that in Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn. ( 268 … ,] ... an obvious indication that the government [was] endorsing or promoting religion” (Matter of Griffin v Coughlin, 88 NY2d 674, 687-688 [1996], cert denied 519 US 1054 [1997], quoting Lee v Weisman, supra at 604 [Blackmun

ALTIC, NANCY v. BOARD OF EDUCATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2016

IN THE MATTER OF NANCY ALTIC, ET AL., PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BOARD OF EDUCATION, ONONDAGA-CORTLAND-MADISON BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES … Board of Ed. of Watertown City Sch.

Hoey v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

284 A.D.2d 633 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 2001

Cayuga-Onondaga Board of Cooperative Educational Services had not committed an improper employer practice. … PERB’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, which turns on whether there exists a rational basis in the record to support the findings upon which the agency’s determination is predicated (see, Matter of Purdy v

Manatrizio v. Board of Education

278 A.D.2d 207 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 2000

However, the dilatory conduct of the defendants’ attorney warrants the imposition of a financial sanction (see generally, DeJulio v Wulf, 260 AD2d 425 ; Wells Fargo Alarm Servs, v Consumers Distrib., 150 AD2d 372 ).

County of Nassau v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

91 A.D.2d 53 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 6, 1983

and a remittal to respondent following this court’s determination that there was not substantial evi *54 dence in the record to support the final equalization rates established by respondent (Matter of County of Nassau v … That portion of the order which denied the motion to reargue is not appealable (Frankel v Frankel, 67 AD2d 719 ).

Wisseman v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment

212 A.D.2d 196 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1995

That section provides in pertinent part as follows: "If it is made to appear to the state board * * * that the state equalization rate established by it for a city or town is inequitable as applied to real property within … [DeAngelo] v Cuomo, 195 AD2d 189, 190 ).

Northern Pines MHP, LLC v. Board of Assessment Review

72 A.D.3d 1314 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 2010

Board of Assessors of City of Schenectady, 51 AD3d 1094, 1096 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 710 [2008]; Matter of Eckerd Corp. v Gilchrist, 44 AD3d 1239, 1240-1241 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 707 [2008]) and is limited to whether … Board of Assessment Review of *1317 Town of Clifton Park, 49 AD3d 941, 942-943 [2008]; Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Town of Moreau Assessor, 307 AD2d 669, 670 [2003]).

Jonsher Realty Corp./Melba, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

118 A.D.3d 787 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 2014

Board of Assessors of Nassau County, 29 AD3d 1002 [2006], affd 8 NY3d 249 [2007]; Matter of Meadowbrook Plaza Assoc. v Board of Assessors, 174 AD2d 744 [1991]; Niebuhr v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 143 AD2d 989 … , 59 NY2d 262, 263, 269 [1983]; Matter of Krugman v Board of Assessors of Vil. of Atl.