Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

2.32s

  • Leone v. Planning Board

    84 A.D.2d 784 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1981

    Order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Zeck, J.), dated August 18,1980, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (see Press v County of Monroe, 50 NY2d 695 ; Solnick v Whalen, 49 NY2d 224 ). Margett, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Engelke v. Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP

    111 A.D.3d 444 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 2013

    Gee, 100 AD3d 437, 438 [1st Dept 2012]; Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266 , 268 [1st Dept 2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; Estate of Steinberg v Harmon, 259 AD2d 318 [1st Dept 1999]). … Plaintiff had all of the disputed documents and cannot claim any prejudice in pursuing his claim (see Suazo v Linden Plaza Assoc., L.P., 102 AD3d 570, 571 [1st Dept 2013]; McMahon v Ford Motor Co., 34 AD3d 263, 264 [1st Dept

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CRK Contracting of Suffolk, Inc. v. Jeffrey M. Brown & Associates, Inc.

    260 A.D.2d 530 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 19, 1999

    Generalow, 213 AD2d 379, 380 , quoting Braunstein v Braunstein, 114 AD2d 46, 53 ; see, D.C.I. … Danaco Contrs. v Associated Univs., 248 AD2d 663 ; Coliseum Towers Assocs. v County of Nassau, 217 AD2d 387, 390 ).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Conklin v. Board of Child Welfare

    254 A.D. 837 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 1938

    (Matter of Jones v. Willcox, 80 App. Div. 167 ; Osterhoudt v. Board of Supervisors, 98 N. Y. 239 .) … Accordingly, under our decision in Matter of Amann v. Finegan ( 253 App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment

    254 A.D. 651 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 1938

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moreira-Brown v. City of New York

    109 A.D.3d 761 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 26, 2013

    Konrad v Brown, 91 AD3d 545 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 804 [2012]). … Plaintiff’s contention that the motion was untimely is unpreserved and may not be raised for the first time on appeal (see Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Devitt v. Ulster County Board of Realtors

    32 A.D.2d 993 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1969

    New York State Psychological Assn., 14 N Y 2d 100, 106-107; Matter of Kurk v. Medical Soc. of County of Queens, 24 A D 2d 897, affd. 18 N Y 2d 928). … Matter of Salter v. New York State Psychological Assn., supra, p. 107). It is not enough, as petitioner contends, to show he is unable to “ make a living on an equal competitive basis with members of the respondent.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Board of Managers

    289 A.D.2d 1 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 2001

    record,” here, the mortgage held by Cadlerock (Bankers Trust Co. v Board of Mgrs. of Park 900 Condominium, 81 NY2d 1033, 1036 ). … Realty Corp. v Mina Equities Corp., 95 AD2d 169, 169-170 ). We thus direct the tenant to attorn and turn over all rents to plaintiff pendente lite.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Acero v. New York State Board of Parole

    308 A.D.2d 641 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2003

    The petition was properly dismissed by Supreme Court as untimely as it exceeded the applicable four-month statute of limitations (see CPLR 217 [1]; see also Matter of Grant v Senkowski, 95 NY2d 605 [2001]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Otero v. New York State Board of Parole

    266 A.D.2d 771 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 24, 1999

    Notably, “[t]he ultimate power to order reincarceration and fix a date for rerelease rest[s] with the Parole Board or a member acting on its behalf’ (People ex rel. … Coleman v Smith, 75 AD2d 706, 707 , lv denied 50 NY2d 804 ; see, 9 NYCRR 8005.20 [b]; Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [x]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sitterly Road Associates v. Board of Assessment Review

    142 A.D.2d 243 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1988

    Partnership v Board of Assessors, 127 AD2d 584, 585 ). … Town of Guilderland, 91 AD2d 799 , affd 59 NY2d 902 ; Newsday, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 82 AD2d 245, 250-252 , affd 55 NY2d 272 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v. Board of Assessors

    137 A.D.3d 1029 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 2016

    However, where a petitioner demonstrates the existence of a valid and credible dispute regarding valuation, the presumption is rebutted (id. at 188; Matter of Commerce Holding Corp. v Board of Assessors of Town of Babylon … Board of Assessors of Town of Babylon, 88 NY2d at 732 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stonegate Family Holdings, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    222 A.D.2d 997 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1995

    Board of Assessors, 43 ÁD2d 649). … Tea Co. v Kiernan, 42 NY2d 236 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Board of Mgrs. of the 190 Meserole Ave. Condominium v. Board of Mgrs. of the 188 Meserole Ave. Condominium

    191 A.D.3d 629 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 3, 2021

    Board of Mgrs. of the 190 Meserole Ave. Condominium v Board of Mgrs. of the 188 Meserole Ave. Condominium ( 2021 NY Slip Op 00541 ) Board of Mgrs. of the 190 Meserole Ave. … Condominium v Board of Mgrs. of the 188 Meserole Ave.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Board of Education

    104 A.D.3d 666 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 2013

    The plaintiffs service of a late notice of claim upon the Board was a nullity, as it was made without leave of the court (see Browne v New York City Tr. … v Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist., 47 NY2d 613, 617 [1979]; Kim L. v Port Jervis City School Dist., 61 AD3d 825, 827 [2009]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bain v. New York City Board of Education

    268 A.D.2d 451 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 2000

    intruders “is a governmental function involving policymaking regarding the nature of the risks presented, and that no liability arises from the performance of such a function absent a special duty of protection” (Bonner v … City of New York, 73 NY2d 930, 932 ; see, Dickerson v City of New York, 258 AD2d 433 ; Edwards v City of Mount Vernon, 230 AD2d 821 ; see also, Krakower v City of New York, 217 AD2d 441 ; Salmond v Board of Educ., 131 AD2d

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Casolaro v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Elmsford

    200 A.D.2d 742 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 1994

    nature of its prior unambiguous determination (see, Matter of Kennedy v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 78 NY2d 1083 ; Matter of De Beilis v Luney, 128 AD2d 778 ). … (see, Matter of Kennedy v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 167 AD2d 542 , affd 78 NY2d 1083 , supra).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dilluvio v. Board of Regents of the University

    60 A.D.2d 699 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1977

    On our review of this record, we cannot say that the administrative determination of guilt was not supported by substantial evidence or without a rational basis (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ). … We cannot say that the penalty imposed is under all of the attendant circumstances so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra; Matter of Gliwa v

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Community School Board No. 9, Bronx

    49 A.D.2d 766 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 29, 1975

    This case does not fall within the ambit of prior cases decided by this court (Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 42 AD2d 702 ; Greenwald v Community School Bd. … No. 19, 48 AD2d 834 ; Matter of Parris v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 48 AD2d 835 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. New York State Crime Victims Board

    302 A.D.2d 380 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 3, 2003

    of the New York State Crime Victims Board (hereinafter the Board) is supported by substantial evidence. … Accordingly, the Board properly rejected the petitioner’s claim for reimbursement of private school tuition expenses. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.