Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.57s

  • Rubenzahl v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    37 A.D.2d 1020 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 1971

    The School Districts contained in a Board of Cooperative Educational Services are charged respectively with a proportionate share of the final budget adopted by the board. … Thus, the rental charge by a School District to a board for classrooms is a proper budgetary item.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Black v. Board of Appeals of Inc.

    33 A.D.2d 916 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Podgers v. Niagara County Board of Elections

    32 A.D.2d 877 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 19, 1969

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scire v. Board of Regents of University

    23 A.D.2d 943 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 1965

    Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules to review the determination of the Board of Regents revoking petitioner’s license to practice medicine. … The question of punishment and its mitigation is primarily one for the Board of Regents. {Matter of Ray v. Board, of Regents, 9 A D 2d 560; Matter of Smigel v. Board, of Regents, 15 A D 2d 623.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGarry Contracting Co. v. Board of Education

    255 A.D. 984 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1938

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southern Desk Co. v. Board of Education

    250 A.D. 843 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 16, 1937

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilaka Construction Co. v. Board of Education

    268 A.D. 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 17, 1944

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Tomack Subsidiary, Inc.

    265 A.D. 909 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anthony v. State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    245 A.D. 798 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1935

    On March 14, 1934, the Jefferson county alcoholic beverage control board recommended that the license be revoked on the ground that petitioner’s premises had ceased to be a bona fide restaurant. … Investigations were made by the State Board and considerable testimony was taken before a member of the State Liquor Authority, before whom petitioner was given a hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Willis Flooring Co. v. Board of Education

    243 A.D. 554 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1934

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Friedel v. Board of Regents of University

    269 A.D. 890 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1945

    Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Regents, suspending appellant’s license to practice medicine for a period of. six months. … Five members voted for suspension of appellant’s license for a period of one year, and so recommended to the Board of Regents.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilensky v. Board of Regents of University

    269 A.D. 918 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 19, 1945

    This is a review of a disciplinary action of the Board of Regents which found the petitioner guilty of aiding an unlicensed person, namely one Horowitz, to practice dentistry.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Sabatino v. Parole Board

    219 A.D. 751 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1927

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brownell Bros. v. Village Board of Waterford

    226 A.D. 842 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1929

    Order reversed on the law, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Matter of Brownell Brothers, Inc., v. Town Board of Town of Waterford (ante, p. 842), decided herewith. Van Kirk, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Julius Friedrich Co.

    260 A.D. 995 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 1940

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eaton v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    261 A.D. 468 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1941

    (Eaton v. Comr., 37 B. T. A. 283; affd., 100 F. [2d] 1013; certiorari denied, 307 U. S. 636 .) *470 The determination should be confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merrill v. United Box Board & Paper Co.

    164 A.D. 906 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Albert Pearlman, Inc. v. Board of Education

    12 A.D.2d 598 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lill v. Monroe County Board of Elections

    17 A.D.2d 900 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northampton Colony, Inc. v. Board of Appeals

    16 A.D.2d 830 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 1962

    In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul a determination of the respondent Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Old Westbury, denying the petitioner’s application for a variance

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.