Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.43s
Sunday Telegram Corp. v. Board of Supevisors
227 A.D. 683 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublishedMerrill v. United Box Board & Paper Co.
149 N.Y.S. 1096 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1914
Cited 0 timesPublishedSiemer v. Village Board of Orchard Park
286 A.D. 956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublishedRawe v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
286 A.D. 1062 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Concord Construction Co.
248 A.D. 557 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1936
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaim of Wood v. Board of Education
264 A.D. 744 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1942
Cited 0 timesPublishedSierra Construction Co. v. Board of Appeals
15 A.D.2d 994 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublishedColin v. New York State Parole Board
8 A.D.2d 672 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublishedPlanet Construction Corp. v. Board of Education
8 A.D.2d 781 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublishedKempler v. Board of Assessors of Newburgh
18 A.D.2d 1098 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 1963
In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, to review the tax assessment of petitioner’s real property for the year 1961, the Board of Assessors of the Town of Newburgh appeals: (1) from so much of … However, I am of the opinion that once Special Term directed the Board of Assessors to furnish the petitioner with the report of its appraisal expert, the court should have required petitioner to supply the board with the
Cited 0 timesPublishedHeckler Electric Co. v. Board of Education
13 A.D.2d 1019 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 26, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaim of Gramlich v. Board of Education
272 A.D.2d 980 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 17, 1947
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaim of Gowing v. Brownville Board Co.
271 A.D.2d 851 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 1946
Cited 0 timesPublishedNeshamkin v. Board of Regents of University
269 A.D. 891 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1945
The Board of Regents rendered a decision revoking petitioner’s license to practice medicine. There is ample evidence to sustain the determination of the Board of Regents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPowers v. New York State Board of Elections
122 A.D.2d 970 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 22, 1986
of Elections (hereinafter Board). … the doctrine enunciated in Matter of Pell v Coveney ( 37 NY2d 494 ) (see, Matter of Gartner v Salerno, 74 AD2d 958, 959 ; cf.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSchachter v. Community School Board District 24
123 A.D.2d 381 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 22, 1986
Cited 0 timesPublishedKabinof v. Village of Harriman Planning Board
147 A.D.2d 563 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 1989
At bar, the Planning Board failed to take any action on the petitioner’s application after erroneously advising the petitioner that his application was improper. … The Planning Board must determine whether the standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance have been met by the petitioner’s proposal (see, Sherman v Frazier, 84 AD2d 401 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFistraw Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessors
120 A.D.2d 790 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 1986
Cited 0 timesPublishedHowe v. Board of Regents of the University
210 A.D.2d 541 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1994
Respondent Board of Regents adopted the recommendations of the second Regents Review Committee, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the Board of Regents’ determination ensued. … Board of Regents, 178 AD2d 748, 750-751 , appeal dismissed 79 NY2d 977 , lv denied 80 NY2d 918 , cert denied — US —, 113 S Ct 1815 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Mgrs. of Brightwater Towers Condominium v. Shlivko
186 A.D.3d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 12, 2020
Board of Mgrs. of Brightwater Towers Condominium v Shlivko ( 2020 NY Slip Op 04451 ) Board of Mgrs. of Brightwater Towers Condominium v Shlivko 2020 NY Slip Op 04451 Decided on August 12, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department … The context of the statements was such that a reasonable reader would have concluded that he or she was reading an opinion, and not a fact, about the plaintiff ( see Stolatis v Hernandez , 161 AD3d 1207 ; Brummel v Board
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna