Case law

Lewis v. Niagara County Board of Elections

32 A.D.2d 876 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 19, 1969

Memorandum: There is substantial merit to the contention of petitioner-respondent that an individual member of the Board of Elections has no authority to appeal from the order made herein!.

Claim of Gioscia v. Workmen's Compensation Board

28 A.D.2d 1067 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1967

Hunt v. Niagara County Board of Supervisors

28 A.D.2d 1076 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 26, 1967

By resolution adopted June 2, 1942 the Niagara County Board of Supervisors adopted the form of Civil Service Administration known as County Civil Service Commission to consist of three persons., one to be appointed for a

Shapiro v. Board of Regents of University

29 A.D.2d 801 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 1968

We have reviewed petitioner’s other allegations of errors concerning procedural unfairness and unconstitutionality and find them to be without merit upon the instant record (see Matter of Popper v. … Board of Regents, 26 A D 2d 871). Likewise, the question of punishment and its mitigation is primarily for the Board of Regents and we find no reason to disturb its action (Matter of Scire v.

Sostre v. Prison Board of Attica Prison

21 A.D.2d 976 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 24, 1964

Starkie Holding Corp. v. Board of Education

249 A.D. 601 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 1936

Starkie Holding Corp. v. Board of Education

249 A.D. 601 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 1936

Starkie Holding Corp. v. Board of Education

248 A.D. 723 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1936

G. Drouve Co. v. Board of Education

248 A.D. 620 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1936

Sunday Telegram Corp. v. Board of Supevisors

227 A.D. 683 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1929

Merrill v. United Box Board & Paper Co.

149 N.Y.S. 1096 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1914

Kennedy v. National Jewelers' Board of Trade

175 A.D. 735 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1916

The defendant National Jewelers’ Board of Trade was not a party to that proceeding but has been held liable on the theory that it instigated or co-operated with *737 others in the commencement and prosecution thereof. … If you should determine that it was not verified by these men, why all that comes back to the Board of Trade, because the representative of the Board of Trade could not take the affidavits of these men of their acknowledgment

Siemer v. Village Board of Orchard Park

286 A.D. 956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1955

Rawe v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

286 A.D. 1062 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 1955

Board of Education v. Concord Construction Co.

248 A.D. 557 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1936

Claim of Wood v. Board of Education

264 A.D. 744 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1942

Sierra Construction Co. v. Board of Appeals

15 A.D.2d 994 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 1962

Colin v. New York State Parole Board

8 A.D.2d 672 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1959

Planet Construction Corp. v. Board of Education

8 A.D.2d 781 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1959

Kempler v. Board of Assessors of Newburgh

18 A.D.2d 1098 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 1963

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, to review the tax assessment of petitioner’s real property for the year 1961, the Board of Assessors of the Town of Newburgh appeals: (1) from so much of … However, I am of the opinion that once Special Term directed the Board of Assessors to furnish the petitioner with the report of its appraisal expert, the court should have required petitioner to supply the board with the