Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.33s

  • Acero v. New York State Board of Parole

    308 A.D.2d 641 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2003

    The petition was properly dismissed by Supreme Court as untimely as it exceeded the applicable four-month statute of limitations (see CPLR 217 [1]; see also Matter of Grant v Senkowski, 95 NY2d 605 [2001]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doolan v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    64 A.D.2d 702 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 31, 1978

    In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Second Supervisory District of Suffolk County, to furnish petitioner with certain statistical information, the appeal is … from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 20, 1977, which granted the petition and directed the board to furnish a study entitled "NIS Salary Study for Administrators”.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Town of Owego Planning Board

    64 A.D.2d 777 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 20, 1978

    November 28, 1977 in Tioga County, which dismissed, on an objection in point of law, petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to annul a determination made by the Town of Owego Planning Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Caristo Construction Corp. v. Board of Education

    57 A.D.2d 939 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 31, 1977

    If the board and city were held vicariously liable, then there is a claim against the board for an act or omission of the plaintiff, and the comptroller was entitled to withhold the moneys due it. … Even under a narrow construction, this clause entitles the comptroller to withhold moneys whenever a claim is made against the board which may be attributed to the negligence of the plaintiff.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marriott Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    57 A.D.2d 840 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 2, 1977

    The determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, denying petitioner’s application for a permit to erect a freestanding sign, was based upon a finding that such a sign is not necessary to identify … Since the determination of the zoning board of appeals was not unreasonable, it must be confirmed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Addison v. Westchester County Board of Elections

    54 A.D.2d 704 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • R & C Corp. v. Board of Education

    53 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Suffolk Educational Chapter v. Board of Education

    51 A.D.2d 971 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 1, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • R & C Corp. v. Board of Education

    50 A.D.2d 943 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 1975

    Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remanded to the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York to consider all bids submitted and to decide which bids, if any, should be rejected. … The respondent Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York did not have authority to reject all bids, as the bylaws reserve that right exclusively to the board itself (By-Laws of Board of Educ. of City of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SMC Employers Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

    51 A.D.2d 514 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 5, 1976

    Determination of respondent, Workmen’s Compensation Board, dated October 28, 1975, refusing to issue new licenses for the year commencing July 1, 1975 to SMC Employers Corporation and two of its employees to represent self-insured … employees before the board, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of directing the issuance of licenses to SMC, Kearns and Burke, with the effect of said licenses to

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Flaton v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors

    49 A.D.2d 934 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 1975

    Judgment modified, on the law, by changing portions of the text of the abstracts of Propositions Nos. 1 and 2 as follows: As to Proposition No. 1 the second paragraph of the matter under the subcaption "Board of Supervisors … With Weighted Voting” shall be changed to read as follows: "The purpose and effect of this law is to reapportion the voting power of the six-member Board of Supervisors.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alee Transit Corp. v. Board of Education

    49 A.D.2d 737 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 5, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beilinson v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    48 A.D.2d 650 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Claims, Ltd. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

    43 A.D.2d 514 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 1973

    (Matter of Fink v. Cole, 1 N Y 2d 48.) Petitioners do not contest the validity of the above-cited rule. Instead, they argue that the board has improperly interpreted it. … (Matter of Luxenberg v. Stichman, 2 A D 2d 605, 607.) Petitioners’ reliance on section 85-a of the Insurance Law is misplaced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Castelluzzo v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

    41 A.D.2d 1015 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 18, 1973

    As was stated in Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. … (Motion pursuant to section 298, Executive Law, to annul order of Appeal Board). Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eagle Vending Corp. v. Board of Education

    41 A.D.2d 849 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eisenberg v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

    33 A.D.2d 998 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1970

    The record amply supports the determination of the Human Rights Appeal Board affirming the dismissal of petitioner’s complaint by the Division of Human Rights.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kolecki v. Niagara County Board of Elections

    33 A.D.2d 644 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 1969

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoyte v. Board of Regents of University

    33 A.D.2d 944 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 12, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Witjas v. Westchester County Board of Elections

    32 A.D.2d 814 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 1969

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.