Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.76s
902 Associates v. New York City Loft Board
229 A.D.2d 351 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 25, 1996
upheld if not irrational or unreasonable (see, Matter of Johnson v Joy, 48 NY2d 689, 691 ). … Owners v New York City Loft Bd., 118 AD2d 312, 318 , affd 71 NY2d 915 ; see, Ostrer v Schenck, 41 NY2d 782 , 785-786).
Cited 8 timesPublished110 A.D.3d 17 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 31, 2013
determined that “courts do not possess the power to dismiss an action for general delay where [the] plaintiff has not been served with a 90-day demand to serve and file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b)” (Chase v … Courts have inherent powers “to do all things reasonably necessary to enable [them] to administer justice effectively” (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 35 [2000]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedStipo v. Westchester County Board of Elections
307 A.D.2d 1055 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 26, 2003
Therefore, that meeting was held in contravention of the Committee’s rules, and under the circumstances of this case the Supreme Court properly concluded that any action taken at the meeting was invalid (see Israel v Matthews … , 171 AD2d 896, 898 [1991]; Matter of Bachmann v DeFronzo, 164 AD2d 926, 929 [1990]).
Cited 1 timesPublished109 A.D.3d 423 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 14, 2013
Additionally, the *424 ledger maintained by the Board of Elections correctly identified all of the volumes in the petition. … Our decision in Matter of Feliciano v Guastella ( 98 AD3d 434 [2012]), relied upon by the Board of Elections, is factually distinguishable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWarner v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
99 A.D.2d 680 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 27, 1984
of Brown v Murphy, 43 AD2d 524 ; Matter of Erdman v Ingraham, 28 AD2d 5 ; Matter of Shields v Hults, 21 AD2d 745 ). … Matter of Strain v Sarafan, 57 AD2d 525 ) nor is it the sole basis of the board’s findings (cf.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMount Tremper Lutheran Camp v. Board of Assessors
70 A.D.2d 984 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 1979
Board of Assessors of Town of Glen, supra; Crusade for Christ v Town of New Lebanon, 36 AD2d 247, 250 , affd 31 NY2d 765 ). … Petitioner failed to pass the second step set forth in Matter of Shrine of Our Lady of Martyrs of Auriesville v Board of Assessors of Town of Glen, (supra).
Cited 7 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Brown v. Conway
55 A.D.3d 1422 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 3, 2008
Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted (see People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ann Marie Taddeo, J. — Habeas Corpus.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Sweet v. Board of Supervisors
101 A.D. 327 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1905
the board to make. … Corp. [4th ed.] §§ 457, 936; Moore v. Mayor, 73 N. Y. 238, 246 .)
Cited 10 timesPublishedProte Contracting Co. v. Board of Education
171 A.D.2d 621 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 1991
(See, e.g., F & G Heating Co. v Board of Educ., 103 AD2d 791, 793 ; Castagna & Son v Board of Educ., 151 AD2d 392, 392-393 .) … (Matter of Brown v Board of Trustees, 303 NY 484, 490 ; Matter of Annis v New York City Tr. Auth., 108 AD2d 643, 644 .) No such precautions are necessary when the municipality does not dispute the amount due.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSirota v. New York City Board of Education
283 A.D.2d 369 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 31, 2001
No issues of fact exist as to whether defendants, the New York City Board of Education and the principal and assistant principal of the school where plaintiff was assigned as a special education teacher, discriminated against … Code of City of NY § 8-107 [15]), since they did not substantially limit her in a major life activity, as evidenced by her own physician’s letters affirming her ability to work on a regular, full-time basis (see, Reeves v
Cited 8 timesPublishedGaluski V. Rensselaer County Board of Elections
176 A.D.2d 1061 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 17, 1991
Cited 0 timesPublishedBROWN, BOBBIE D. v. CITY OF BUFFALO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2012
BROWN AND JOSEPH BROWN, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CITY OF BUFFALO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. … Brown (claimant) allegedly suffered personal injuries when she drove off the roadway up an embankment at the dead end of Titus Avenue in respondent, City of Buffalo.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCoward v. New York State Board of Parole
126 A.D.3d 1193 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 19, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublishedHayes v. New York State Board of Elections
32 A.D.3d 660 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 17, 2006
In July 2006, a designating petition was filed with respondent State Board of Elections purporting to name respondent James P. … 297 AD2d 457, 458 [2002]; Matter of Dunlea v New York State Bd. of Elections, 275 AD2d 589, 590 [2000]; Matter of Jacobson v Schermerhorn, 104 AD2d 534 [1984]; Matter of Denn v Mahoney, 64 AD2d 1007, 1008 [1978]).
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees v. W. Wilton Wood, Inc.
97 A.D.2d 781 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1983
, 67 AD2d 968 ; Baum v Baum, 40 AD2d 1000, 1001 ). … Town ofPlattekill, 51 NY2d 670, 673-674 ; People v *783 Scanlon, 11 NY2d 459, 463 ; Dictograph Prods, v Empire State Hearing Aid Bur., 4 AD2d 508, 510 ).
Cited 7 timesPublishedKing Metal Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board
20 A.D.2d 565 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 1963
In a special proceeding by King Metal Products, Inc., as petitioner, to discharge of record a judgment against it in favor of the respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board, and for other relief, the petitioner appeals from … Pape v. Rudolph Bros., 257 App. Div. 1032 , affd. 282 N. Y. 692 ; Brown v. Bendix Aviation Corp., 76 N. Y. S. 2d 422, affd. 274 App. Div. 1049 ).
Cited 7 timesPublished109 A.D.3d 910 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2013
On July 11, 2013, the petitioners attempted to file with the Board of Elections in the City of New York (hereinafter the Board) their designating petitions as candidates for the party positions of members of the Republican … Matter of Krance v Chiaramonte, 87 AD3d 669 [2011]; Matter of Magelaner v Park, 32 AD3d 487, 488 [2006]; Matter of Pearse v New York City Bd. of Elections, 10 AD3d 461, 462 [2004]; Matter of Siems v Lite, 307 AD2d 1016 [2003
Cited 0 timesPublished109 A.D.3d 817 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 11, 2013
Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955 [2012]; Matter of Saunders v Rockland Bd. of Coop. … v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 3 AD3d 502, 503 [2004]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSeaview Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals
53 A.D.2d 605 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1976
In consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent zoning board of appeals, dated July 2, 1975, which, inter alia, (1) granted an application for a special permit for the erection … The board must decide whether the local conditions are such that the need for additional tennis courts outweighs the negative aspects, if any, of remission of the normal set-back and fence height requirements.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Mgrs. of the Spencer Condominium v. Hazan
2022 NY Slip Op 00266 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 2022
Board of Mgrs. of the Spencer Condominium v Hazan ( 2022 NY Slip Op 00266 ) Board of Mgrs. of the Spencer Condominium v Hazan 2022 NY Slip Op 00266 Decided on January 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published … Index No. 154149/12 Appeal No. 15087 Case No. 2021-00528 [*1]Board of Managers of the Spencer Condominium, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Elizabeth Hazan et al., Defendants. 1 East 62nd Street Apt 1A, Nonparty-Appellant.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna