Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Valley Townehouse Condominium v. Board of Assessors
197 A.D.2d 626 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1993
the law, with costs, the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and upon searching the record, the petitioner’s claim that the reassessment of its property was unconstitutional is dismissed (see, Matter of Board … of Mgrs. v Board of Assessors, 197 AD2d 620 [decided herewith]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
116 A.D.3d 444 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 2014
The motion court properly rejected plaintiff’s claim that securitization of his mortgage notes was improper (see Stafford v Mortgage Elec. … Fund v Verizon N.Y.
Cited 0 timesPublishedConsolidated Fisheries Co. v. Brown-Allen Chemicals, Inc.
281 A.D. 747 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 27, 1953
Cited 0 timesPublishedGallonty v. New York City Board of Elections
224 A.D.2d 563 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1996
The Supreme Court properly determined that the objectors substantially complied with the Board of Elections’ rules regarding the filing of specifications of objections to designating petitions (see, Matter of Sullivan v New
Cited 6 timesPublishedNgen Ock Lee v. Riverhead Town Board
120 A.D.2d 530 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1986
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Riverhead Town Board, dated December 21, 1982, denying the petitioner’s application for a special permit to operate a "Type 6 Labor Camp” on the … The record supports a finding that the Town Board’s denial of the petitioner’s application for a special permit to operate a "Type 6 Labor Camp” on the subject premises was properly based upon the fact that the petition and
Cited 0 timesPublishedPoidomani v. Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services
127 A.D.3d 978 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 2015
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Matter of Sica v Walker, 115 AD3d 869 [2014]; Matter of Smith v Carter, 61 AD3d 982 [2009]). … Furthermore, the imposed penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
116 A.D.2d 457 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 2, 1986
(See, Golub v Frank, 65 NY2d 900 [1985].) … (Matter of Briar Hill Apts, v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 44 AD2d 816 [1st Dept 1974].)
Cited 9 timesPublishedErie County Board of Social Welfare v. Fletcher
13 A.D.2d 895 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textPeople ex rel. Robertson v. Board of Supervisors
37 A.D. 626 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1899
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textAubin v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services
190 A.D.2d 1012 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 5, 1993
Cited 0 timesPublishedCross & Brown Co. v. Cimbar Corp.
275 A.D.2d 680 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 21, 1949
Funk v. Nelson, 264 App. Div. 876 .) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Mgrs. of the Saratoga Condominium v. Shuminer
148 A.D.3d 609 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 2017
Branch v Navarro, 25 NY3d 485, 492 [2015]). … Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 544 [1983]).
Cited 7 timesPublishedContinental Can Co. v. Board of Assessors
83 A.D.2d 950 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 21, 1981
The appeal as to the Federal Paper Board Company, Inc., property is not affected by that stipulation. … Judgment affirmed insofar as it relates to the Federal Paper Board *951 Company property, without costs or disbursements.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCooper v. Rockland County Board of Elections
83 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 10, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedEssex Transportation Corp. v. Board of Education
83 A.D.2d 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 13, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedFields v. New York City Campaign Finance Board
81 A.D.3d 441 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 2011
v Ortiz, candidates and treasurers cannot be held personally liable for the repayment of public funds owed to the Board due to overpayments of public funds. … Where statutory language is “clear and unambiguous, the court should construe it so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used” (Matter of Aquilone v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 86 NY2d
Cited 1 timesPublishedGleason v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
98 A.D.2d 964 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 1983
Memorandum: This CPLR article 78 proceeding was commenced to annul an order of the respondent New York State Racing and Wagering Board revoking petitioner’s license to participate in harness racing. … We agree that petitioner should have been given copies of the statements (Matter of Fenimore Circle Corp. v State Liq. Auth., 27 NY2d 716 ; People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 ; Garabedian v New York State Liq.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBabey-Brooke v. Board of Higher Education
66 A.D.2d 831 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 26, 1978
Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 2, 1978, which dismissed petitioner’s appeal from an order of the State Division of Human Rights … Under the circumstances, it is not necessary to reach the procedural question involving the five-month delay by the State division in submitting the record to the State Human Rights Appeal Board. Shapiro, J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedViscarde v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
57 A.D.2d 513 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublishedA. Greene Co. v. Environmental Control Board
55 A.D.2d 884 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna