Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.56s

  • Valley Townehouse Condominium v. Board of Assessors

    197 A.D.2d 626 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1993

    the law, with costs, the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and upon searching the record, the petitioner’s claim that the reassessment of its property was unconstitutional is dismissed (see, Matter of Board … of Mgrs. v Board of Assessors, 197 AD2d 620 [decided herewith]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

    116 A.D.3d 444 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 2014

    The motion court properly rejected plaintiff’s claim that securitization of his mortgage notes was improper (see Stafford v Mortgage Elec. … Fund v Verizon N.Y.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Brown-Allen Chemicals, Inc.

    281 A.D. 747 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 27, 1953

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections

    224 A.D.2d 563 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1996

    The Supreme Court properly determined that the objectors substantially complied with the Board of Elections’ rules regarding the filing of specifications of objections to designating petitions (see, Matter of Sullivan v New

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ngen Ock Lee v. Riverhead Town Board

    120 A.D.2d 530 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1986

    — In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Riverhead Town Board, dated December 21, 1982, denying the petitioner’s application for a special permit to operate a "Type 6 Labor Camp” on the … The record supports a finding that the Town Board’s denial of the petitioner’s application for a special permit to operate a "Type 6 Labor Camp” on the subject premises was properly based upon the fact that the petition and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Poidomani v. Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    127 A.D.3d 978 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 2015

    Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Matter of Sica v Walker, 115 AD3d 869 [2014]; Matter of Smith v Carter, 61 AD3d 982 [2009]). … Furthermore, the imposed penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    116 A.D.2d 457 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 2, 1986

    (See, Golub v Frank, 65 NY2d 900 [1985].) … (Matter of Briar Hill Apts, v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 44 AD2d 816 [1st Dept 1974].)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. Fletcher

    13 A.D.2d 895 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • People ex rel. Robertson v. Board of Supervisors

    37 A.D. 626 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1899

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Aubin v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    190 A.D.2d 1012 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 5, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cross & Brown Co. v. Cimbar Corp.

    275 A.D.2d 680 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 21, 1949

    Funk v. Nelson, 264 App. Div. 876 .) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Mgrs. of the Saratoga Condominium v. Shuminer

    148 A.D.3d 609 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 2017

    Branch v Navarro, 25 NY3d 485, 492 [2015]). … Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 544 [1983]).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Continental Can Co. v. Board of Assessors

    83 A.D.2d 950 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 21, 1981

    The appeal as to the Federal Paper Board Company, Inc., property is not affected by that stipulation. … Judgment affirmed insofar as it relates to the Federal Paper Board *951 Company property, without costs or disbursements.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Rockland County Board of Elections

    83 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 10, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Essex Transportation Corp. v. Board of Education

    83 A.D.2d 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 13, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fields v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

    81 A.D.3d 441 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 2011

    v Ortiz, candidates and treasurers cannot be held personally liable for the repayment of public funds owed to the Board due to overpayments of public funds. … Where statutory language is “clear and unambiguous, the court should construe it so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used” (Matter of Aquilone v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 86 NY2d

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gleason v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

    98 A.D.2d 964 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 1983

    Memorandum: This CPLR article 78 proceeding was commenced to annul an order of the respondent New York State Racing and Wagering Board revoking petitioner’s license to participate in harness racing. … We agree that petitioner should have been given copies of the statements (Matter of Fenimore Circle Corp. v State Liq. Auth., 27 NY2d 716 ; People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 ; Garabedian v New York State Liq.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Babey-Brooke v. Board of Higher Education

    66 A.D.2d 831 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 26, 1978

    Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 2, 1978, which dismissed petitioner’s appeal from an order of the State Division of Human Rights … Under the circumstances, it is not necessary to reach the procedural question involving the five-month delay by the State division in submitting the record to the State Human Rights Appeal Board. Shapiro, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Viscarde v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

    57 A.D.2d 513 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A. Greene Co. v. Environmental Control Board

    55 A.D.2d 884 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.