Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.27s
Werter v. Board of Regents of University
17 A.D.2d 752 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 26, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGarry Contracting Co. v. Board of Education
255 A.D. 984 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthern Desk Co. v. Board of Education
250 A.D. 843 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 16, 1937
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilaka Construction Co. v. Board of Education
268 A.D. 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 17, 1944
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Tomack Subsidiary, Inc.
265 A.D. 909 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 1942
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnthony v. State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
245 A.D. 798 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1935
On March 14, 1934, the Jefferson county alcoholic beverage control board recommended that the license be revoked on the ground that petitioner’s premises had ceased to be a bona fide restaurant. … Investigations were made by the State Board and considerable testimony was taken before a member of the State Liquor Authority, before whom petitioner was given a hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWillis Flooring Co. v. Board of Education
243 A.D. 554 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1934
Cited 0 timesPublishedFriedel v. Board of Regents of University
269 A.D. 890 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1945
Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Board of Regents, suspending appellant’s license to practice medicine for a period of. six months. … Five members voted for suspension of appellant’s license for a period of one year, and so recommended to the Board of Regents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilensky v. Board of Regents of University
269 A.D. 918 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 19, 1945
This is a review of a disciplinary action of the Board of Regents which found the petitioner guilty of aiding an unlicensed person, namely one Horowitz, to practice dentistry.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Sabatino v. Parole Board
219 A.D. 751 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1927
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrownell Bros. v. Village Board of Waterford
226 A.D. 842 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1929
Order reversed on the law, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Matter of Brownell Brothers, Inc., v. Town Board of Town of Waterford (ante, p. 842), decided herewith. Van Kirk, P.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKennedy v. National Jewelers' Board of Trade
175 A.D. 735 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1916
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Julius Friedrich Co.
260 A.D. 995 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 1940
Cited 0 timesPublishedEaton v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
261 A.D. 468 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1941
(Eaton v. Comr., 37 B. T. A. 283; affd., 100 F. [2d] 1013; certiorari denied, 307 U. S. 636 .) *470 The determination should be confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Hill, P.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMerrill v. United Box Board & Paper Co.
164 A.D. 906 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1914
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlbert Pearlman, Inc. v. Board of Education
12 A.D.2d 598 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthampton Colony, Inc. v. Board of Appeals
16 A.D.2d 830 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 1962
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul a determination of the respondent Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Old Westbury, denying the petitioner’s application for a variance
Cited 0 timesPublishedPDH Properties, LLC v. Planning Board of Milton
298 A.D.2d 684 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 17, 2002
Trust v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 98 NY2d 190, 195 ; Matter of Robert Lee Realty Co. v Village of Spring Val., 61 NY2d 892, 893 ). … Trust v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, supra at 196).
Cited 10 timesPublishedFenn v. Suffolk County Board of Elections
59 A.D.2d 709 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 11, 1977
As those petitioners have satisfied the three basic indicia of bona fide residency, the order should be affirmed (see *710 Palla v Suffolk County Bd. of Elections, 38 AD2d 84 , affd 31 NY2d 36 ). Cohalan, J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Managers v. Grishanova
117 A.D.3d 442 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 6, 2014
properly held defendant in contempt where she violated the TRO, which unequivocally prohibited her from having guests reside in her apartment for more than five days if *443 she were not residing there (see Matter of McCormick v … After hearing oral argument and based on the overwhelming evidence in the papers before the court, a further hearing on the motion was unnecessary (see Farkas v Farkas, 209 AD2d 316, 317-318 [1st Dept 1994]; Jaffe v Jaffe
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna