Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.77s
Kahn v. Board of Regents of University
254 A.D. 915 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaim of Maynard v. Board of Education
255 A.D. 908 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1938
— Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board. Claimant was a teacher in the English department of a junior high school at Hastings-on-the Hudson. … Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFraser v. Board of Inspectors of Election
146 A.D. 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1911
Election Law, * as amended by chapter 649 of the Laws of 1911, is violative of article 2; section 4, of the State Constitution, and that, all the inspectors having declared Unequivocally in advance of them convening as a board … that they would refuse to register the appellants on the first registration day unless they appeared personally before the board, this remedy is proper.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhamond v. North Side Board of Trade
164 A.D. 941 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1914
Cited 0 timesPublishedPacker v. Board of Standards and Appeals
271 A.D.2d 874 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 1946
Cited 0 timesPublishedVivien v. Board of Education Retirement System
272 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1947
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaims of Lambo v. Board of Education
10 A.D.2d 810 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1960
(Appeal from part of an order of Monroe Special Term, permitting claimants to serve a late notice of claim upon defendant Board of Education.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlbert Pearlman, Inc. v. Board of Education
11 A.D.2d 934 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlbert Pearlman, Inc. v. Board of Education
9 A.D.2d 887 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 10, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmalgamated Paper Co. v. Board of Education
219 A.D. 782 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1927
Cited 0 timesPublishedBecker v. Joint Board of The Cloak
235 A.D. 670 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1932
Cited 0 timesPublishedValstrey Service Corp. v. Board of Elections
1 A.D.2d 976 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1956
Appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim on the Board of Elections, Nassau County, and on County of Nassau Sanitation and Water Supply Division (departments of Nassau
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Beacon v. Board of Supervisors
248 A.D. 902 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 1936
Cited 0 timesPublished115 A.D.3d 1047 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 2014
Shortly thereafter, defendant Board of Education, Northeastern Clinton Central School District adopted a resolution which, among other things, eliminated Medicare reimbursements for District retirees who were not already … Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 353-354 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Warner v Board of Educ., Cobleskill-Richmondville Cent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Bimco Industries, Inc.
85 A.D.2d 588 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1981
On the record before us, there is no indication of unfair dealings on the part of the plaintiff board in its relations with defendants. … Inherent in the requirement that the board act to promote the best interests of *589 the district is the right and “legal duty to modify its bid specifications as required by the public interests” (see Varsity Tr. v Saporita
Cited 1 timesPublishedHachamovitch v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct
206 A.D.2d 637 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 14, 1994
Matter of Van Gaasbeek v Chassin, 198 AD2d 572, 574 , lv denied 82 NY2d 665 ). … As respondent correctly notes, fraud may be inferred from the surrounding circumstances (see generally, Matter of Van Gaasbeek v Chassin, supra, at 574; Matter of Sung Ho Kim v Board of Regents, 172 AD2d 880, 881-882 , lv
Cited 9 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Asencio v. Brown
62 A.D.3d 1203 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 2009
His conviction was upheld on direct appeal (People v Asencio, 244 AD2d 225 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 888 , 939 [1998]). … Asencio v Greiner, Sup Ct, Dutchess County, Aug. 2, 2002, Hillery, J.; Asencio v Senkowski, 2000 WL 1760908 , 2000 US Dist LEXIS 17304 [SD NY 2000]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSparago v. New York State Board of Parole
132 A.D.2d 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 23, 1987
In September 1984 respondent State Board of Parole revoked petitioner’s parole on the basis of the substituted charge and set a delinquency date of April 25, 1984.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCarbonnier v. Board of Education
112 A.D.3d 406 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 2013
both the teacher and the assistant teacher were walking around the playground assisting and monitoring student play, and it was “the impulsive, unanticipated act of a fellow student” that caused the accident (see Mirand v … City of New York, 85 AD3d 586 [1st Dept 2011]; Charles v City of Yonkers, 103 AD3d 765 , 766 [2d Dept 2013] [monkey bars]; Troiani v White Plains City School Dist., 64 AD3d 701, 702 [2d Dept 2009] [monkey bars]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrant v. New York State Board of Parole
236 A.D.2d 760 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 27, 1997
statutory requirements in arriving at its discretionary decision to refuse petitioner’s application for parole and there is, accordingly, no reason to disturb it (see, Executive Law § 259-i [1], [2]; see also, Matter of Walker v … New York State Div. of Parole, 203 AD2d 757 ; Matter of Patterson v New York State Bd. of Parole, 202 AD2d 940 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna