Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.77s

  • Kahn v. Board of Regents of University

    254 A.D. 915 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1938

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Maynard v. Board of Education

    255 A.D. 908 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1938

    — Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board. Claimant was a teacher in the English department of a junior high school at Hastings-on-the Hudson. … Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fraser v. Board of Inspectors of Election

    146 A.D. 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1911

    Election Law, * as amended by chapter 649 of the Laws of 1911, is violative of article 2; section 4, of the State Constitution, and that, all the inspectors having declared Unequivocally in advance of them convening as a board … that they would refuse to register the appellants on the first registration day unless they appeared personally before the board, this remedy is proper.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whamond v. North Side Board of Trade

    164 A.D. 941 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Packer v. Board of Standards and Appeals

    271 A.D.2d 874 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 1946

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vivien v. Board of Education Retirement System

    272 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1947

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claims of Lambo v. Board of Education

    10 A.D.2d 810 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1960

    (Appeal from part of an order of Monroe Special Term, permitting claimants to serve a late notice of claim upon defendant Board of Education.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Albert Pearlman, Inc. v. Board of Education

    11 A.D.2d 934 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Albert Pearlman, Inc. v. Board of Education

    9 A.D.2d 887 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 10, 1959

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Paper Co. v. Board of Education

    219 A.D. 782 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1927

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Becker v. Joint Board of The Cloak

    235 A.D. 670 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1932

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Valstrey Service Corp. v. Board of Elections

    1 A.D.2d 976 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1956

    Appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim on the Board of Elections, Nassau County, and on County of Nassau Sanitation and Water Supply Division (departments of Nassau

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Beacon v. Board of Supervisors

    248 A.D. 902 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 1936

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Agor v. Board of Education

    115 A.D.3d 1047 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 2014

    Shortly thereafter, defendant Board of Education, Northeastern Clinton Central School District adopted a resolution which, among other things, eliminated Medicare reimbursements for District retirees who were not already … Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 353-354 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Warner v Board of Educ., Cobleskill-Richmondville Cent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Bimco Industries, Inc.

    85 A.D.2d 588 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1981

    On the record before us, there is no indication of unfair dealings on the part of the plaintiff board in its relations with defendants. … Inherent in the requirement that the board act to promote the best interests of *589 the district is the right and “legal duty to modify its bid specifications as required by the public interests” (see Varsity Tr. v Saporita

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hachamovitch v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

    206 A.D.2d 637 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 14, 1994

    Matter of Van Gaasbeek v Chassin, 198 AD2d 572, 574 , lv denied 82 NY2d 665 ). … As respondent correctly notes, fraud may be inferred from the surrounding circumstances (see generally, Matter of Van Gaasbeek v Chassin, supra, at 574; Matter of Sung Ho Kim v Board of Regents, 172 AD2d 880, 881-882 , lv

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Asencio v. Brown

    62 A.D.3d 1203 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 2009

    His conviction was upheld on direct appeal (People v Asencio, 244 AD2d 225 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 888 , 939 [1998]). … Asencio v Greiner, Sup Ct, Dutchess County, Aug. 2, 2002, Hillery, J.; Asencio v Senkowski, 2000 WL 1760908 , 2000 US Dist LEXIS 17304 [SD NY 2000]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sparago v. New York State Board of Parole

    132 A.D.2d 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 23, 1987

    In September 1984 respondent State Board of Parole revoked petitioner’s parole on the basis of the substituted charge and set a delinquency date of April 25, 1984.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Carbonnier v. Board of Education

    112 A.D.3d 406 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 2013

    both the teacher and the assistant teacher were walking around the playground assisting and monitoring student play, and it was “the impulsive, unanticipated act of a fellow student” that caused the accident (see Mirand v … City of New York, 85 AD3d 586 [1st Dept 2011]; Charles v City of Yonkers, 103 AD3d 765 , 766 [2d Dept 2013] [monkey bars]; Troiani v White Plains City School Dist., 64 AD3d 701, 702 [2d Dept 2009] [monkey bars]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brant v. New York State Board of Parole

    236 A.D.2d 760 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 27, 1997

    statutory requirements in arriving at its discretionary decision to refuse petitioner’s application for parole and there is, accordingly, no reason to disturb it (see, Executive Law § 259-i [1], [2]; see also, Matter of Walker v … New York State Div. of Parole, 203 AD2d 757 ; Matter of Patterson v New York State Bd. of Parole, 202 AD2d 940 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.