Case law

Brown v. Taylor

221 A.D.2d 208 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1995

(Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134 , quoting Delgado v Board of Educ., 65 AD2d 547 , affd 48 NY2d 643 ; see, Ellis v Hoelzel, 57 AD2d 968 .) In the instant case, there is no basis upon which to set aside the verdict.

Hershkovitz v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 00436 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 2025

Hershkovitz v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 00436 ) Hershkovitz v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 00436 Decided on January 29, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … LANDICINO, JJ. 2022-10166 (Index No. 509763/17) [*1]Rita Hershkovitz, respondent, v Douglas E. Brown, Jr., defendant, City of New York, et al., appellants.

Smith v. Brown

272 A.D.2d 993 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 10, 2000

; Van Etten v Van Etten, 207 AD2d 992 ; see also, Matter of Smith v Patrowski, 226 AD2d 1073 ). … Moore, supra; see also, Matter of Done v Hyde, 227 AD2d 915 ).

People v. Brown

232 A.D.2d 168 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 1996

Elwell, 50 NY2d 231, 234-235 ; People v Hicks, 38 NY2d 90 ). … Everette, 226 AD2d 235 ; People v Alston, 222 AD2d 294 , affd 88 NY2d 519 ).

Jones v. Brown

70 A.D.2d 897 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 1979

People v. Brown

24 A.D.3d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 2005

People v Hill, 67 AD2d 427, 432 [1979], appeal dismissed 50 NY2d 894 [1980]). … Cook, 93 NY2d 840, 841 [1999]; People v Gorham, 17 AD3d 858, 860-861 [2005]; People v Higgins, 12 AD3d 775, 777-778 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 764 [2005]).

Williams v. Brown

53 A.D. 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900

(Bradford v. … Further, the evidence establishes that the defendants paid full face value of the check in cash to the drawer, Brown, and if the plaintiff recover of them, any attempt on their part to proceed against Brown might be met by

Brown v. Wing

251 A.D.2d 572 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1998

Brown, was institutionalized on February 2, 1995. … of Rho v Ambach, 74 NY2d 318, 321 , quoting Kurcsics v Merchants Mut.

Nikolopolous v. Brown

270 A.D.2d 240 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 2000

Parker (see, Stowe v Simmons, 253 AD2d 422 ; Perez v Velez, supra; Marshall v Albano, 182 AD2d 614 ). … Simmons, 253 AD2d 422 , supra; Khodadadian v Wolff, 242 AD2d 681 ; Cacaccio v Martin, 235 AD2d 384 ; Waaland v Weiss, 228 AD2d 435 ).

Brown v. Stephan

245 A.D. 588 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1935

McBride v. Atchinson, supra, pp. 118, 119 ; Matter of Goold v. Vosburg, 152 Misc. 599, 600 ; affd., 243 App. Div. 679 ; Matter of McNeles v. Board of Supervisors, 173 id. 411.) … (Matter of Jacobs v. Board of Supervisors, 143 Misc. 30 ; modfd. and affd., 236 App. Div. 193 .)

Haas v. Brown

282 A.D. 916 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 1953

People v. Brown

71 A.D.3d 1043 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 2010

Sorbello, 285 AD2d 88, 96 [2001]; People v Norris, 34 AD3d 501, 502-503 [2006]). … CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]) and, in any event, is without merit, as the supplemental charge conveyed a correct statement of the law (see People v Mateo, 5 AD3d 507 [2004]), and was consistent with the

People v. Brown

108 A.D.2d 922 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 25, 1985

No such proof was offered by him (see generally, People v Clark, 41 NY2d 612 , 616-617, cert denied 434 US 864 ; 2 CJI, Penal Law § 160.15 [4], at 950-954; Hechtman, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book … Moreover, the trial court properly permitted evidence of defendant’s attempted flight from the police to be introduced (see, People v Yazum, 13 NY2d 302, 304 ; cf. People v Irvin, 43 NY2d 704, 705 ).

People v. Brown

116 A.D.3d 597 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2014

Brown v. Ames

290 A.D.2d 693 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 10, 2002

In determining the location of property boundaries, “natural landmarks and artificial monuments take precedence over mere metes and bounds descriptions” (Zelnik Realty v York, 170 AD2d 926, 928 ; see, Pauquette v Ray, 58 … v Carfizzi, 225 AD2d 1009, 1010 ).

Hawke v. Brown

50 N.Y.S. 1032 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 26, 1898

And see Hexamer v. Webb, 101 N. Y. 377, 383 , 4 N. E. 755 ; Engel v. Eureka Club, 137 N. Y. 100 , 32 N. E. 1052 . The rule is thus well expressed by Sharswood, J., in Oil Co. v. Gilson, 63 Pa. … Heffernan v. Benkard, 1 Bob. (N. Y.) 432.

Brown v. Prack

134 A.D.3d 1367 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 24, 2015

correction officers who witnessed or were involved in the three incidents, combined with petitioner’s admissions, provided substantial evidence to support the charges for which he was found guilty (see Matter of Jackson v … Fischer, 87 AD3d 1246, 1247 [2011]; see also Matter of Rivera v Smith, 63 NY2d 501, 515-516 [1984]).

People v. Brown

265 A.D. 153 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1942

(People v. DeGarmo, 179 N. Y. 130, 135 ; People v. Perry, 277 N. Y. 460, 467 .) … (People v. Zackowitz, supra; Coleman v. People, 55 N. Y. 81, 88 .)

People v. Brown

216 A.D.2d 737 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1995

It has long been established that in order to admit a photograph into evidence, authentication is required (see, People v Byrnes, 33 NY2d 343, 349 ). … are authenticated by testimony of a person familiar with the object portrayed therein that it is a correct representation of such object, in this case one of the handguns found in defendant’s bedroom (see, e.g., Alberti v

Crookston v. Brown

140 A.D.2d 868 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1988

We find no error in the fact that respondent disagreed with the Hearing Officer’s recommended penalty (see, Matter of Sanchez v Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Adm’rs, 93 AD2d 916 ). … The court held that "[sjexual harassment in the work place is among the most offensive and demeaning torments an employee can undergo” (supra, at 961; see also, Matter of Brais v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 706 ).