Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.84s

  • Posh Bagel, Inc. v. Board of Health

    75 A.D.2d 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 27, 1980

    (See Matter of Hecht v Monaghan, 307 NY 461 .) We also note that the transfer by Special Term was improper. … (See Falkenbury v Schultz, 44 AD2d 827 ; cf. Matter of Mistler v Tofany, 39 AD2d 710 .) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Adventist Home, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    192 A.D.2d 1044 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1993

    Here, that period began to run on July 1, 1990, the date of the filing of the final assessment roll (see, supra; Global Frozen Food v County of Nassau, 153 AD2d 669 ; LaFayette Cent. … School Dist. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 101 AD2d 1015 ). Therefore, because suit was not commenced until May 10, 1991, it was untimely (see, Press v County of Monroe, 50 NY2d 695 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. City of New York

    2019 NY Slip Op 5773 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 24, 2019

    Matter of Brown v City of New York ( 2019 NY Slip Op 05773 ) Matter of Brown v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 05773 Decided on July 24, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting … Dist. , 28 NY3d 455, 466 ; see Matter of Fethallah v New York City Police Dept. , 150 AD3d 998, 1001 ; Matter of Ramos v Board of Educ. of the City of N.Y. , 148 AD3d 909, 912 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Peck v. Town Board

    27 A.D. 476 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

    Read v. … Brown v. Supervisors of Herkimer County (3 How. Pr. [N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 194 Main, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    71 A.D.3d 1028 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 2010

    The evidence adduced during the hearing before the Zoning Board established that the petitioner created the hardship by purchasing the land with knowledge that it was not zoned for commercial use (see Matter of Clark v Board … were distinguishable from the petitioner’s application, and, therefore, the Zoning Board was not bound by its earlier determination (see Matter of Arata v Morelli, 40 AD3d 991, 993 [2007]; Matter of Conversions for Real

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jay v. Board of Regents of the University

    50 A.D.2d 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 1975

    Matter of Di Donna v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y, 3 AD2d 797). … Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Long Island Industrials Group v. Board of Assessors

    72 A.D.3d 1090 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 2010

    Ofman, 49 AD3d 485 [2008]; Levi v Levi, 46 AD3d 519 [2007]). … Taylor Bldrs. v City of Saratoga Springs Bd. of Assessment Review, 263 AD2d 829 [1999]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Northport-East v. Ambach

    90 A.D.2d 227 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1982

    ; James v Board of Educ., 42 NY2d 357 ). … Board of Higher Educ., 49 NY2d 408 ; Matter of McIntosh v Borough of Manhattan Community Coll., 78 AD2d 839 , affd 55 NY2d 913 ).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Vasquez v. New York State Parole Board

    240 A.D.2d 823 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 12, 1997

    New York State Div. of Parole, 203 AD2d 757 ) and there is no showing of either error or "irrationality bordering on impropriety” (Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69, 77 ). … As a final matter, we are unpersuaded that this Court’s decision in Matter of Marturano v Hammock ( 87 AD2d 732 , lv denied 56 NY2d 506 ) does not reflect the current state of the law. Mikoll, J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    256 A.D.2d 345 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1998

    The petitioner was employed by the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County (hereinafter BOCES) since March 1974. … Co., 62 NY2d 494 ; Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v Lopez, 46 NY2d 481 ; Schwartz v Public Adm’r of County of Bronx, 24 NY2d 65, 70 ; Matter of Heritage Hills Sewage Works Corp. v Town Bd., 245 AD2d 450 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Managers of Ocean Club v. Mandel

    235 A.D.2d 382 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1997

    of the entire project (see, State of New York v Lundin, 60 NY2d 987 ; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Enco Assocs., supra). … Finally, although the "continuous treatment” doctrine may apply to architects in a proper case (see, Hauppauge Union Free School Dist. v Smith Assocs., supra; Board of Mgrs. v Vector Yardarm Corp., 172 AD2d 303 ; Greater

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Sherwood v. Albany County Board of Elections

    265 A.D.2d 667 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 14, 1999

    The decision in Matter of Cristiano v Otsego County Bd. of Elections ( 181 AD2d 941 , lv denied 80 NY2d 751 ) strongly supports our holding in this case. … Instead of looking at the voters’ abilities on election day, the Board of Elections should have concerned itself with the voters’ capabilities at the time of the application.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Reddy v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

    259 A.D.2d 847 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 11, 1999

    Moreover, petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the delay caused him actual prejudice (see, Matter of Lawrence v DeBuono, 251 AD2d 700, 701 ; Matter of *849 Monti v Chassin, 237 AD2d 738, 740 ; Matter of Hubsher v De … DeBuono, 255 AD2d 710 ; *850 Matter of Brown v New York State Dept. of Health, 235 AD2d 957, 958 , lv denied 89 NY2d 814 ; Matter of Sung Ho Kim v Board of Regents, 172 AD2d 880, 881 , lv denied 78 NY2d 856 ).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Vim Construction Co. v. Board of Assessors

    82 A.D.2d 537 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 31, 1981

    The differences in the assessed valuations, using the formula V (value) X R (rate) = A (assessed value) between the parties can be readily seen from the following: “petitioner’s appraisal : “year value equalization ASSESSED … (Town of Huntington v Town of Oyster Bay, Supreme Ct., Nassau County, Oct. 25, 1977, Wager, J.) On December 1, 1977 the approval previously given by the Department of Environmental Conservation was revoked.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pratt v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

    251 A.D.2d 949 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 25, 1998

    Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 , quoting Moffatt v Moffatt, 86 AD2d 864 , affd 62 NY2d 875 ). … Although this charge was actually given in error (see, Krey v Board of Educ., 202 AD2d 397 ), the error was harmless in that defendant was not prejudiced given the jury’s verdict in its favor.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Board of Regents of the University

    279 A.D. 447 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1952

    Their conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Barsky v. United States, 167 F. 2d 241 ), and certiorari was twice denied by the Supreme Court. ( 334 U. … Marks v. Brophy ( 293 N. Y. 469 ). Both of these cases involved mandatory punitive action, not discretionary; and neither involved the statute which we are considering here.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Ryewood Farms, Ltd.

    144 A.D.2d 413 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1988

    Hence, the parties are precluded from introducing parol evidence to contradict or modify the agreement (see, Chimart Assocs. v Paul, 66 NY2d 570 ; Fogelson v Rackfay Constr. … P., Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Willard v. Town Board

    216 A.D.2d 862 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1995

    Same Memorandum as in Matter of Willard v Town Bd. *863 of Town of Hamburg ( 216 AD2d 861 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Renewal.) Present—Denman, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau

    153 A.D.3d 1419 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 2017

    In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Administrative Appeals Board dated December 31, 2013, which affirmed the denial of the petitioner’s … Power Auth., 97 AD3d 593 , 595 [2012]; Matter of Pabon v Phillips, 16 AD3d 589, 590 [2005]), while the rest are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see Matter of Solutions Economics, LLC v Long Is.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tougher Industries, Inc. v. Board of Education

    286 A.D.2d 880 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 28, 2001

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.