Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.30s
BROWN, RICHARD M. v. MILLER, JARED PRESTON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 24, 2017
BROWN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JARED PRESTON MILLER AND LYNNETTE F. MILLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … Mulvey, 126 AD3d 1323, 1324; French v Symborski, 118 AD3d 1251, 1251, lv denied 24 NY3d 904).
Cited 0 timesPublishedConnors v. New York City Loft Board
57 A.D.3d 447 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2008
Respondent’s findings are supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222 , 230-231 [1974]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Spencerport Teachers Ass'n
57 A.D.2d 709 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 7, 1977
Cited 1 timesPublishedGordon v. New York State Board of Parole
81 A.D.3d 1032 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 3, 2011
of Rodney v Dennison, 24 AD3d 1152, 1153 [2005]). … Inasmuch as respondent’s decision does not exhibit “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” (see Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69,
Cited 6 timesPublishedSessa v. Board of Assessors of North Elba
46 A.D.3d 1163 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 2007
Board of Assessors, Town of Hurley, 257 AD2d *1165 958, 960 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 813 [1999]; see also Matter of Nicola v Board of Assessors of Town of N. … Co. v Springer, 130 AD2d 493, 493 [1987]; Matter of Rizika v Board of Assessors of Vil. of Herkimer, 62 Misc 2d 774, 776 [1970]; see also Matter of Fry v Village of Tarrytown, 89 NY2d at 720 n 2).
Cited 16 timesPublishedSimonsen v. Zoning Board of Appeals
24 A.D.3d 787 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 27, 2005
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, dated July 8,1999, which granted the application of Catherine Nettesheim and Peter Nettesheim … Such counsel fees were not incurred “by reason of the injunction” (CPLR 6312 [b]; see Cross Props. v Brook Realty Co., 76 AD2d 445, 458-459 [1980]; cf.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKaye v. New York City Loft Board
162 A.D.2d 208 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 1990
Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ). … Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedPrice v. New York City Board of Education
51 A.D.3d 277 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2008
Assn. v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 39 NY2d 111, 121 [1976]). … Servs., 77 NY2d 753 [1991] [review of civil servant’s dismissal from position]; Matter of Aronsky v Board of Educ., Community School Dist.
Cited 13 timesPublishedAbrams v. New York State Board of Parole
88 A.D.2d 951 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 1982
Petitioner failed to make a “convincing showing” either that respondent did not consider the recommendation of the sentencing Judge (see Matter ofQafa v Hammock, 80 AD2d 952, 953 ), or that it considered erroneous information … Discretionary decisions of the Board of Parole are not judicially reviewable (see Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 5; Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 24 NY2d 21 ). Weinstein, J.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSlant/Fin Corp. v. Board of Assessors
186 A.D.2d 810 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 26, 1992
Corp. v Srogi, 60 NY2d 885, 887 ; Matter of Merrick Holding Corp. v Board of Assessors, 45 NY2d 538, 541-542 ). … Bank v Board of Assessors, 166 AD2d 648 ; Matter of Gilpin Assocs. v Board of Assessment Review, 121 AD2d 719, 720 ). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTarantino v. Westchester County Board of Elections
8 A.D.3d 672 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 2004
authority to grant the petitioners’ request for a manual recanvassing and recounting of contested punch-card ballots, as such a remedy is beyond those specifically provided for in the Election Law (see Matter of Delgado v … Sunderland, 97 NY2d 420 [2002]; Matter of Mondello v Nassau County Bd. of Elections, 6 AD3d 18 [2004]).
Cited 1 timesPublishedRestivo v. New York State Board of Parole
70 A.D.3d 1096 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 4, 2010
of Lewis v Travis, 9 AD3d 800 [2004]). … Given that respondent’s decision does not reflect “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” (Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980
Cited 13 timesPublishedPark v. Board of Regents of University
222 A.D.2d 946 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1995
the first time in this proceeding) (cf., People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940 ; People v Haupt, 71 NY2d 929, 931 ). … These substitutions, in and of themselves, do not mandate a new hearing or dismissal of the charges (see, Matter of Láveme v Sobol, 149 AD2d 758, 761 , Iv denied 74 NY2d 610 ; cf., Matter of Briggs v Board of Regents, 188
Cited 3 timesPublishedHoward v. New York State Board of Parole
5 A.D.3d 271 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 2004
Nevertheless, since respondent failed to follow the procedure set forth in CPLR 511 (a) and (b), it is not entitled to a change of venue as of right, as it sought (Banks v New York State & Local Employees’ Retirement Sys. … Phillips v Tietjen, 108 App Div 9, 10 [1905]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.
Cited 9 timesPublishedMalaga v. Suffolk County Board of Elections
66 A.D.3d 902 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 20, 2009
A proceeding to validate a nominating petition is governed by the statute of limitations set forth in Election Law § 16-102 (2) *903 (see Matter of McDonough v Scannapieco, 65 AD3d 647 [2009]; Matter of Wilson v Garfinkle … , 5 AD3d at 410 ; see Matter of Green v Mahr, 230 AD2d 873, 874 [1996]).
Cited 1 timesPublishedPhilipstown Dirt Roads Ass'n v. Town Board
246 A.D.2d 656 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 26, 1998
The primary purpose of SEQRA is “to inject environmental considerations directly into governmental decision making” (Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v Board of Estimate, 72 NY2d 674, 679 ; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 569 … Corp., 67 NY2d 400, 417 , supra; quoting Aldrich v Pattison, 107 AD2d 258, 265 ; see, Matter of Merson v McNally, 90 NY2d 742 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedSommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
93 A.D.2d 481 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1983
Altman, 39 AD2d 200 ; Henrock Realty Corp. v Tuck, 52 AD2d 871 ). … is delivered to the tenant (Matter of Briar Hill Apts. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 44 AD2d 816 ).
Cited 23 timesPublishedKelsky v. Town of Lewisboro Planning Board
215 A.D.2d 483 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 8, 1995
Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 571 ; see also, ECL 8-0111 [6]; 8-0105 [7]; 8-0109 [2]; 6 NYCRR 617.8; Matter of Sutton Area Community v Board, of Estimate, 78 NY2d 945, 947 ). … Accordingly, "the 'hard look’ standard of judicial review is satisfied and the determination must be confirmed” (Matter of Sutton Area Community v Board of Estimate, supra, at 947). Sullivan, J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPurchase Environmental Protective Ass'n v. Town Board
207 A.D.2d 351 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 1, 1994
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town Board and Planning Board of the Town and Village of Harrison, granting a special exception use permit and site plan approval for construction … Further, we conclude that PEPA lacks standing to raise the *353 remaining causes of action asserted in its petition in Matter No. 1 and its petition/complaint in Matter No. 2 (see, Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v Board of
Cited 2 timesPublishedOld County Burgers Co. v. Town Board
127 A.D.2d 772 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 1987
Board of Appeals, 30 NY2d 238 ). … Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna