Case law

Wollins v. New York City Board of Education

8 A.D.3d 30 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 3, 2004

Accordingly, the municipal defendant did not have timely actual notice of the facts constituting the claim by virtue of such a report (see Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [2000]). … City of New York, 1 AD3d 254, 256 [2003]; Hochberg v City of New York, 99 AD2d 1028, 1029 [1984], affd 63 NY2d 665 [1984]).

Matter of Mascia v. City of Buffalo

2018 NY Slip Op 6341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 28, 2018

MASCIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v CITY OF BUFFALO, BYRON W. BROWN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BUFFALO, MICHAEL A. … PAYNE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS A MEMBER OF THE BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DONNA BROWN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS A MEMBER OF THE BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, YVONNE

People ex rel. Soto v. Board of Parole

2022 NY Slip Op 06305 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 2022

Soto v Board of Parole ( 2022 NY Slip Op 06305 ) People ex rel. … Soto v Board of Parole 2022 NY Slip Op 06305 Decided on November 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Russo v. New York State Board of Parole

69 A.D.2d 520 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 6, 1979

the one-third point in their sentences (see People v Esteves, 41 NY2d 826 ). … imprisonment] be given no less effective and meaningful parole consideration than [those prisoners with a definite sentence (who automatically come up for parole after one third of their maximum term has expired)]” (Grasso v

Bowery Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors

153 A.D.2d 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 21, 1989

Investors v Board of Assessors ( 153 AD2d 656 [decided herewith]). … Investors v Board of Assessors, supra; see also, Vantage Petroleum v Board of Assessment Review, 91 AD2d 1037, 1038-1039 , affd 61 NY2d 695 , citing Matter of Sperry Rand Corp. v Board of Assessors, 77 AD2d 822 ).

Washington v. New York City Board of Education

95 A.D.3d 739 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 29, 2012

v Piran Realty Corp., 30 AD3d 319 , 320 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 801 [2007]). … New York City Dept. of Educ., 68 AD3d 631 [2009]; Reed, 30 AD3d at 320; Kane v Estia Greek Rest., 4 AD3d 189, 190 [2004]).

Claim of Baker v. Horicon School Board

245 A.D. 879 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1935

— Claimant was injured in the employ of the school board while shoveling gravel onto a truck, in company with his brother Ellis, Robert Waters and other men. Waters was the truck driver. … The Industrial Board has found that claimant did not initiate the quarrel and was not the aggressor. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P.

Matter of Robins v. Board of Assessment Review

2025 NY Slip Op 02119 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 10, 2025

Matter of Robins v Board of Assessment Review (2025 NY Slip Op 02119) Matter of Robins v Board of Assessment Review 2025 NY Slip Op 02119 Decided on April 10, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York … Browne of counsel), for appellants. Miller, Mannix, Schachner & Hafner, LLC, Glens Falls (Jacquelyn P. White of counsel), for respondents. Ceresia, J.

Thompson v. New York City Board of Education

10 A.D.3d 650 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 13, 2004

untimely motion for summary judgment in view of the defendant’s failure to offer a satisfactory explanation for not serving the motion within 120 days of the filing of the note of issue as required by CPLR 3212 (a) (see Brill v

Board of Education v. Mars Associates, Inc.

133 A.D.2d 800 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 26, 1987

School Dist., 113 AD2d 884 ; Coley v Michelin Tire Corp., supra). … City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 ; County of Westchester v Welton Becket Assocs., 102 AD2d 34, 36 , affd 66 NY2d 642 , supra).

Spears v. Town of Cortlandt Planning Board

44 A.D.3d 866 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 16, 2007

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Planning Board’s interpretation of its subdivision regulations was not unreasonable or irrational (see Matter of Hoag v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Clinton, 27 AD3d 742 [2006 … Further, the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the Planning Board’s determination was irrational, arbitrary, or capricious (see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d 304, 307-308 [2002]; Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d

Best Payphones, Inc. v. Environmental Control Board

88 A.D.3d 595 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 25, 2011

LLC v Highland Capital Mgt., L.P., 86 AD3d 469, 473-474 [2011]). … In light of 2001 letters from petitioner’s counsel agreeing to accept the NOVs, we conclude that respondent satisfied its *596 initial burden of establishing the propriety of service (Matter of 72A Realty Assoc. v New York

Brodie v. Board of Mgrs. of the Aldyn

2024 NY Slip Op 02138 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 2024

Brodie v Board of Mgrs. of the Aldyn ( 2024 NY Slip Op 02138 ) Brodie v Board of Mgrs. of the Aldyn 2024 NY Slip Op 02138 Decided on April 23, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting … Index No. 652081/22 Appeal No. 1928-1929 Case No. 2023-02607, 2023-03231 [*1]Stefan Brodie et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Board of Managers of the Aldyn et al., Defendants-Respondents, "John Does" #1 through #10, Defendants

Zuckerman v. New York State Board of Parole

53 A.D.2d 405 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 29, 1976

In any event, we have held that this Statute applies to the Board of Parole (Dowling v State of New York, 49 AD2d 982 ). … Minutes of Parole Board meetings are not specifically exempted by either of these statutes.

Board of Education v. Somers Faculty Ass'n

48 A.D.2d 873 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 1975

note, with considerable emphasis, that it has been the policy of this State to promote labor peace and stability by the submission of labor disputes to binding arbitration (see Matter of Associated Teachers of Huntington v … Board of Educ., Union Free School Hist.

Hardtop Pavers, Inc. v. Brown

46 A.D.2d 732 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1974

receive the paving contract in opposition to defendants’ demonstration of justification for their conduct, there was no triable issue of fact and the court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint (Indig v. … Finkelstein, 23 N Y 2d 728; Campbell v. Gates, 236 N. Y. 457 ). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term dismissing complaint.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Goldman and Del Vecehio, JJ.

Davies Farm, LLC v. Planning Board of Clarkstown

54 A.D.3d 757 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 9, 2008

Matter of Joy Builders, Inc. v Town of Clarkstown, 54 AD3d 761 [2008] [decided herewith]; Matter of International Innovative Tech. … Group Corp. v Planning Bd. of Town of Woodbury, N.Y., 20 AD3d 531 [2005]). The case of Joseph v Planning Bd. of Town of Yorktown ( 140 AD2d 670 [1988]), cited by the petitioner, is not controlling.

Kowalski v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors

57 A.D.2d 858 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 9, 1977

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 5, 1977, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated August

Fusco v. Westchester County Board of Elections

286 A.D.2d 456 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 22, 2001

Therefore, the proceeding should have been dismissed (see, Matter of Gadsen v Board of Elections, 57 NY2d 751 ; Matter of Wein v Molinari, 51 NY2d 717 ; Matter of Marchant v Echaveste, 186 AD2d 101 ; Matter of Moss v D'Apice … , 138 AD2d 436 ; Matter of Philpotts v Black, 122 AD2d 909 ; Matter of Brosnan v Black, 104 AD2d 469 , affd 63 NY2d 692 ).

Patterson v. New York State Board of Parole

202 A.D.2d 940 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 31, 1994