Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.13s
160 A.D.2d 1037 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1990
-295 ; People v Kaye, 25 NY2d 139, 143-145 ). … The issue raises a question of law for the court to decide and is not a question of fact for the jury (see, People v Knack, 72 NY2d 825 ).
Cited 6 timesPublished293 A.D.2d 686 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2002
The witness had a clear and unobstructed view of the defendant, under well-lit conditions, for a 15-second period during the commission of the crime (see People v Androvett, 135 AD2d 640 ; People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418
Cited 11 timesPublished80 A.D. 413 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1903
Cited 6 timesPublished69 A.D.3d 871 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 2010
Chavis, 91 NY2d 500, 505 [1998]; People v Smith, 82 NY2d at 678 ). … Kendzia, 64 NY2d 331, 337 [1985]; People v Caussade, 162 AD2d 4, 7 [1990]).
Cited 3 timesPublished220 A.D.2d 250 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1995
voir dire and opening and final instructions, inter alia, to be "ministers of truth” and that their verdict should "speak the truth”, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law for failure to object (People v … (Supra; People v Rawls, 187 AD2d 353 , Iv denied 81 NY2d 845 ; People v Pena, 196 AD2d 753 , Iv denied 82 NY2d 900 .) Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Cited 6 timesPublished150 A.D.2d 472 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 8, 1989
v Soto, 146 AD2d 657 ; People v Morris, 129 AD2d 591 ). … v Concepcion, 128 AD2d 887 , lv withdrawn 69 NY2d 1002 ; People v Abreu, 74 AD2d 876 ).
Cited 11 timesPublished82 A.D.3d 1067 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 22, 2011
Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Cited 1 timesPublished73 A.D.2d 112 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 1980
(CPL 300.50; People v Henderson, 41 NY2d 233 , 235.) … Mayo, 48 NY2d 245, 253 ; People v Fudger, 70 AD2d 703 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished252 A.D.2d 835 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 23, 1998
his attorney was well prepared, made appropriate pretrial motions, conducted effective cross-examination of the People’s witnesses and delivered a detailed and cogent opening statement and closing arguments (see, People v … Ryan, 90 NY2d 822 ; People v Parker, 220 AD2d 815, 817 , lv denied 87 NY2d 1023 ).
Cited 11 timesPublished60 A.D.2d 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 30, 1978
However, the trial court, by the portion of the charge above-quoted improperly removed this option from the jury (see People v Bostick, 51 AD2d 749 ). … People v Burgess, 50 AD2d 1036, 1037 ). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Suozzi and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Cited 5 timesPublished2025 NY Slip Op 01639 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 19, 2025
People v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 01639 ) People v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 01639 Decided on March 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … No. 307/20) [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Tracey Brown, also known as Tracy Brown, appellant. Thomas J. Butler, Melville, NY, for appellant. Raymond A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 2015
People v Brown ( 2015 NY Slip Op 03287 ) People v Brown 2015 NY Slip Op 03287 Decided on April 21, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Decided on April 21, 2015 Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, JJ. 14877 [*1] The People of the State of New York, Ind.5045/10 Respondent, — v Kendall Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Seymour W.
Cited 0 timesPublished92 A.D.2d 939 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 1983
Under these circumstances, suppression *940 is not warranted (CPL 710.30, subd 3; People v Anderson, 80 AD2d 33 ; People v Jones, 69 AD2d 912 , affd 51 NY2d 915 ). … P., Bracken, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Cited 9 timesPublished160 N.Y.S. 1125 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1915
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text59 N.Y.S. 1100 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 18, 1899
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text272 A.D.2d 338 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2000
v Mapp, 245 AD2d 307 ; People v Persaud, 237 AD2d 538 ). … People v Stith, 215 AD2d 789 ; People v Cox, 161 AD2d 724, 725 ; People v Jakes, 181 AD2d 913 ).
Cited 16 timesPublished226 A.D.2d 242 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1996
reasonable view of the evidence to support defendant’s request for a charge of petit larceny as a lesser included offense, especially given defendant’s testimony at trial denying any form of larceny whatsoever (see, People v
Cited 2 timesPublished23 A.D.2d 661 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 1, 1965
Matter of Mastrangelo v. State Council of Parks, 42 Misc 2d 650 , affd. 21 A D 2d 879). … Y. 45, 52-54 ; Rindge Co. v. Los Angeles, 262 U. S. 700 ; People ex rel. Consolidated Water Co. v. Maltbie, 275 N. Y. 357, 369-370 ).
Cited 7 timesPublished124 A.D.3d 492 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 20, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublished122 A.D.3d 461 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 2014
The sequence of events, including Brown’s aggressive request for money, and the overall course of conduct of Brown, Raye, and a third participant support the inference that all three participants acted in concert with regard … to each of the crimes charged (see People v Allah, 71 NY2d 830 [1988]; see also People v Smokes, 165 AD2d 696 [1st Dept 1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 991 [1990]).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna