Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.82s
Palla v. Suffolk County Board of Elections
38 A.D.2d 84 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1971
That proceeding was entitled Blumenthal v. Suffolk, County Bd. of Elections. … Y. 117 ) nor an affirmative answer (Matter of Robbins v. Chamberlain, 297 N. Y. 108 ).
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v. Platt
2020 NY Slip Op 06342 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 5, 2020
Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v Platt ( 2020 NY Slip Op 06342 ) Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v Platt 2020 NY Slip Op 06342 Decided on November 05, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York … Index No. 155985/14 Appeal No. 12274N Case No. 2020-01672 [*1]Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v Elaine Platt, Defendant-Respondent. Gallett Dreyer & Berkey LLP, New York (Morrell I.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArlington Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education
72 A.D.2d 600 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 29, 1979
On March 15, 1977 Burger commenced a proceeding under CPLR article 78 to review the board’s determination finding him guilty of the charges and dismissing him as a teacher (Matter of Burger v Board of Educ., 72 AD2d 603 ) … "Once the controversy is heard and a decision arrived at either by the arbitrator or by the commissioner or by the judge, that is the end of the matter” (Board of Educ. v Associated Teachers of Huntington, 30 NY2d 122, 132
Cited 1 timesPublishedTridee Associates, Inc. v. Board of Education
22 A.D.3d 833 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 2005
The defendant, the Board of Education of the City of New York (hereinafter the BOE), sought to convert the plaintiffs building into an elementary school. … Corp. v McTague, 21 AD3d 610 [2005]; Abbott, Duncan & Wiener v Ragusa, 214 AD2d 412, 413 [1995]). The plaintiff sent the BOE an invoice containing 26 items for which it sought additional compensation.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKing v. Saratoga County Board of Supervisors
223 A.D.2d 894 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 1996
On May 20, 1993, this Court handed down its decision in Matter of Seymour v County of Saratoga (supra), nullifying Resolution No. 86 of 1991. … Bank v City of Albany, 92 NY 363, 366-367 ; Nassau County v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn, 218 AD2d 688 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v. Platt
2020 NY Slip Op 06342 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 5, 2020
Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v Platt ( 2020 NY Slip Op 06342 ) Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v Platt 2020 NY Slip Op 06342 Decided on November 05, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York … Index No. 155985/14 Appeal No. 12274N Case No. 2020-01672 [*1]Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v Elaine Platt, Defendant-Respondent. Gallett Dreyer & Berkey LLP, New York (Morrell I.
Cited 1 timesPublishedProte Contracting Co. v. Board of Education
276 A.D.2d 309 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 12, 2000
Co. v Board of Educ., 230 AD2d 32 .) Thereafter, the Board served a second amended answer with counterclaims. … Co. v Board of Educ., supra, 230 AD2d 32, 41 .)
Cited 8 timesPublishedDi Lucia v. Town Board of Westford
160 A.D.2d 1152 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 19, 1990
Neither a town superintendent nor a planning board may bind a municipality to accept a proffered dedication absent the town board’s consent (see, Highway Law § 171; Entress v Sours, 272 App Div 861 ; Koff v Frank, 22 Misc … Center v Moore, 52 NY2d 88, 93-94 ; Matter of Burns v Regan, 87 AD2d 944, 946 , appeal dismissed 57 NY2d 954 ). Nor do we find the Town Board’s refusal to accept petitioners’ roads to be arbitrary or capricious.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDesotelle v. Town Board of Schuyler Falls
301 A.D.2d 1003 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 30, 2003
We have previously held that “[a] highway or street located within the geographical limits of a town may become a town highway either by dedication or use” (Matter of Hillelson v Grover, 105 AD2d 484, 485 ). … Dedication, in turn, requires absolute relinquishment to public use by the owner, acceptance and a formal opening (see Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge Co. v Bachman, 66 NY 261, 269 ).
Cited 9 timesPublishedShaughnessy v. Herkimer County Board of Elections
104 A.D.2d 731 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 21, 1984
The failure of the signers of the designating petition to provide the “town or city” of residence is *732 a fatal defect and renders the designating petition invalid (Matter of McKeever v Hornidge, 306 NY 876 ; Matter of … Scamacca v Mahoney, 104 AD2d 730 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedKeenan v. Chemung County Board of Elections
43 A.D.3d 623 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 2007
Both petitions were filed with respondent Chemung County Board of Elections on July 19, 2007. … Matter of DeCicco v Chemung County Bd. of Elections, 93 NY2d 1008, 1009 [1999]).
Cited 2 timesPublishedPollock v. Board of Regents of the University
266 A.D. 696 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 3, 1943
Cited 2 timesPublishedNo opinion textForcucci v. Board of Education
151 A.D.3d 1662 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 2017
Same memorandum as in Forcucci v Board of Educ. of Hamburg Cent. Sch. Dist. ([appeal No. 1] 151 AD3d 1660 [2017]). Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra and Scudder, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedForcucci v. Board of Education
151 A.D.3d 1662 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 2017
Same memorandum as in Forcucci v Board of Educ. of Hamburg Cent. Sch. Dist. ([appeal No. 1] 151 AD3d 1660 [2017]). Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra and Scudder, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFeinberg v. Board of Appeals of Sanford
306 A.D.2d 593 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 2003
Trust v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 98 NY2d 190, 195 [2002]; Matter of PDH Props. v Planning Bd. of Town of Milton, 298 AD2d 684, 685 [2002]; Matter of Market Sq. … Trust v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, supra at 196).
Cited 5 timesPublishedWestbury Trombo, Inc. v. Board of Trustees
307 A.D.2d 1043 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 25, 2003
On November 2, 2000, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Westbury (hereinafter the Board)" passed Local Law No. 10 (2000) of the Village of Westbury. … The local laws under review in this case likewise may not be upheld as an exercise of the Board’s general police powers (see Matter of Belle Harbor Realty v Kerr, 35 NY2d 507 [1974]; cf.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Mgrs. of Harborview Condominium v. Goodman
189 A.D.3d 1529 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2020
Board of Mgrs. of Harborview Condominium v Goodman ( 2020 NY Slip Op 08030 ) Board of Mgrs. of Harborview Condominium v Goodman 2020 NY Slip Op 08030 Decided on December 30, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published … DUFFY BETSY BARROS, JJ. 2019-04603 (Index No. 61962/17) [*1]Board of Managers of Harborview Condominium, respondent, v Paul Goodman, appellant. Paul Goodman, New York, NY, appellant pro se.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCerro v. Washington County Board of Supervisors
270 A.D.2d 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 2000
Petitioner commenced this combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and action for declaratory judgment to challenge a determination by respondent Washington County Board of Supervisors (hereinafter the Board) to sell a parcel … Rather, we held that notwithstanding the perceived breach by the Board of its own rules, since the Board’s decision did not violate a State statute we were not permitted to substitute our judgment for the Board’s, especially
Cited 3 timesPublishedWright v. Board of Assessors of Ticonderoga
177 A.D.2d 741 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1991
When petitioner challenged the Town Board’s determination to repeal the 1985 local law, we upheld the Town Board’s right to do so (see, Matter of Wright v Town Bd., 169 AD2d 190 ). … It is true that, where a town board has established the office of town attorney, counsel employed by the town board "in respect to any particular subject matter, proceeding or litigation” is employed as "counsel to the town
Cited 3 timesPublishedDunsmoor v. Town of Oswego Planning Board
104 A.D.3d 1210 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna