Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.67s

  • Willis v. Suffolk County Board of Elections

    54 A.D.3d 436 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 20, 2008

    Matter of Hosley v Curry, 85 NY2d 447, 450 [1995]). … Matter of Gallagher v Dinkins, 41 AD2d 946 [1973], affd 32 NY2d 839 [1973]).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wade v. Town of Ticonderoga Town Board

    256 A.D.2d 860 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 17, 1998

    Board of Educ., 160 AD2d 1150, 1151 ; Matter of Brais v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 706, 707 ). … Disabilities, 93 AD2d 960, 961 ), and the penalty imposed was by no means so disproportionate as to shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Comeau v Board of Educ., supra, at 1152; Matter of Crookston v Brown, 140 AD2d

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Sun Indemnity Co. v. Board of Education

    264 A.D. 73 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 4, 1942

    Royal Indemnity *75 Co. v. Travelers Insurance Co., 244 App. Div. 582 ; affd., 270 N. Y. 574 ; and Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co., 277 id. 385.) … It is to be noted that there is a contrary ruling in Lee v. Board of Education of City of New York ( 263 App. Div. 23, 25, 26 [1st Dept.]), with which ruling we are not in accord.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kay v. Board of Higher Education

    259 A.D. 879 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 1940

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Town Board

    214 A.D.2d 573 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1995

    Board of Appeals, 30 NY2d 238 ; Matter of Texaco Ref. & Mktg. v Valente, 174 AD2d 674 ). … Village of Spring Val., 61 NY2d 892 ; Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals, supra; Matter of C.B.H.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cusack v. Board of Education

    89 A.D. 355 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1903

    (See Matter of Cusack v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 136 .) … Applying this, view further to the appellant’s case, it would have led to. a singular result *359 had the board of education discontinued the evening schools altogether.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bloom v. Jewish Board of Guardians

    261 A.D. 143 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 10, 1941

    Accordingly, it has been held that a board of education created under a statute of this nature is liable for the negligent acts of its servants. (See Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N. Y. 196 .) … In Murtha v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v. Platt

    2020 NY Slip Op 06342 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 5, 2020

    Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v Platt ( 2020 NY Slip Op 06342 ) Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc. v Platt 2020 NY Slip Op 06342 Decided on November 05, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York … Index No. 155985/14 Appeal No. 12274N Case No. 2020-01672 [*1]Board of Windsor Owners Corp., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v Elaine Platt, Defendant-Respondent. Gallett Dreyer & Berkey LLP, New York (Morrell I.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Corporate Property Investors v. Board of Assessors

    203 A.D.2d 317 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 11, 1994

    as a result of certain school district resolutions purporting to opt out of the tax exemptions provided by RPTL 485-b, which were held to be invalid by the Court of Appeals (see, Matter of Walker v Board of Assessors, 66 … Investors v Board of Assessors ( 153 AD2d 656 , affd on other grounds 80 NY2d 961 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Troy v. Board of Assessors

    53 A.D.2d 794 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1976

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • King v. Saratoga County Board of Supervisors

    223 A.D.2d 894 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 1996

    On May 20, 1993, this Court handed down its decision in Matter of Seymour v County of Saratoga (supra), nullifying Resolution No. 86 of 1991. … Bank v City of Albany, 92 NY 363, 366-367 ; Nassau County v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn, 218 AD2d 688 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commerce Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessors

    216 A.D.2d 466 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 19, 1995

    In a proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review the real property tax assessment of a parcel of real property for the tax years 1986-1987 through 1991-1992, the Board of Assessors and the Board of Assessment … Corp. v Board of Assessors, 143 AD2d 135 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Board of Education

    62 N.Y.S. 1143 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 9, 1900

    See White v. Berry, 171 U. S. 366 , 18 Sup. Ct. 917, 43 L. Ed. 199 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gavin v. Board of Supervisors

    174 A.D. 900 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1916

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Sup'rs v. Phipps

    54 N.Y.S. 946 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1898

    Board v. Phipps, 28 App. Div. 521 , 51 N. Y. Supp. 203 . … Such authority having been devolved upon the board by the legislature, no question can arise as to the validity of its exercise. People v. Board of Sup’rs, 112 N. Y. 585 , 20 N. E. 549 ; People v. McIntyre, 154 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donald Axinn Co. v. Board of Assessors

    81 A.D.2d 667 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 1981

    Special Term denied petitioner’s motion for partial summary judgment, without prejudice to renewal upon determination of the appeal from an order upon a similar motion in the related case of Matter of Slewett & Farber v Board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Desotelle v. Town Board of Schuyler Falls

    301 A.D.2d 1003 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 30, 2003

    We have previously held that “[a] highway or street located within the geographical limits of a town may become a town highway either by dedication or use” (Matter of Hillelson v Grover, 105 AD2d 484, 485 ). … Dedication, in turn, requires absolute relinquishment to public use by the owner, acceptance and a formal opening (see Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge Co. v Bachman, 66 NY 261, 269 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Granger Group v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    62 A.D.3d 1102 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 14, 2009

    When petitioners learned that Callahan had authorized Wilzig to complete construction of the building, they filed an appeal with respondent Zoning Board of Appeals (hereinafter ZBA) challenging Callahan’s actions in issuing … Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 98 NY2d 165, 173 [2002]; Matter of Salvador v Town of Lake George Planning Bd., 31 AD3d 906, 907 [2006]; Durham v Village of Potsdam, 16 AD3d 937, 938 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Claim of Sheehan v. Board of Trustees

    256 A.D. 148 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 1939

    C. 369), and cited with approval by Judge Hubbs in Van Gee v. … The decision should be reversed on the law and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs to the claimant against the Industrial Board. Hill, P.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Young, Fenton, Kelsey & Brown v. Wein

    111 A.D.3d 1194 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 27, 2013

    WYFK was thereafter renamed plaintiff Young, Fenton, Kelsey & Brown, EC. (hereinafter the Young firm). … Urtz v Grow and $3,513.20 in Palmieri v Peterson, and, as so modified, affirmed. .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.